ORCID Profile
0000-0002-6363-1382
Current Organisations
Queensland University of Technology (QUT)
,
Queensland University of Technology
,
Jönköping University
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
In Research Link Australia (RLA), "Research Topics" refer to ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes. These topics are either sourced from ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes listed in researchers' related grants or generated by a large language model (LLM) based on their publications.
Business and Management | Small Business Management | Entrepreneurship | Innovation And Technology Management | Innovation and Technology Management | Manufacturing Engineering | Manufacturing Processes and Technologies (excl. Textiles) | Petroleum and Reservoir Engineering | Timber, Pulp and Paper | Organisation and Management Theory
Industry policy | Technological and organisational innovation | Management | Technological and Organisational Innovation | Productivity (excl. Public Sector) | Management | Oil and Gas Extraction | Human Capital Issues | Expanding Knowledge in Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services | Expanding Knowledge in Economics | Wood, Wood Products and Paper not elsewhere classified | Fabricated Metal Products not elsewhere classified |
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2019
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2009
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2009
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 1995
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 12-2018
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 08-2019
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 2003
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 09-08-2012
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 10-2002
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
Date: 27-10-2006
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
Date: 27-03-2015
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 1998
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 05-2003
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 15-04-2021
DOI: 10.1177/23409444211008902
Abstract: For decades, entrepreneurship and strategy research has been dominated by agent-centric and inward-looking theoretical perspectives. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates the limits of this stance, as its influence on business has been both enormous and palpable. For the most part, the effects of the pandemic are no doubt negative. Business research—and presumably business practice—typically address such influence in terms of failure, resilience, and crisis management among existing businesses. Contrasting this prevalent discourse, we focus instead on positive influence of the pandemic for some emerging and new ventures. We analyze the many possible positive effects on entrepreneurship practice and highlight also positive effects on entrepreneurship research. We illustrate both positives by applying the External Enabler framework. JEL CLASSIFICATION: L26, M13, O3, R11
Publisher: Springer New York
Date: 13-10-2010
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 06-2017
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 09-10-2018
Abstract: We develop theory about how and when digital technologies enable new venture creation processes. We identify two fundamental properties of digital technologies—specificity and relationality—and develop propositions that link these properties to six enabling mechanisms: compression, conservation, expansion, substitution, combination, and generation. We use the linked properties and mechanisms to determine how and when in the venture creation process—from prospecting to developing to exploiting—digital technologies have enabled start-ups in the IT hardware sector and develop stage-dependent propositions about their sector-level effects. We conclude our theorizing by discussing its implications beyond digital technologies and the IT hardware sector.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 08-05-2020
DOI: 10.1007/S11187-020-00345-9
Abstract: As a contribution to research and theorizing on the economic role of new firm formation, we undertake the first ever investigation of regional employment effects of the entry of new social firms. Our study is guided by an established model of the employment effects of new firm entry over time and provides a direct comparison to the employment effects of commercial entrants. Our results show that the net employment effect of new social firms follows a wave pattern over the study’s eight-year horizon, apparently produced by the same combination of direct and indirect effects previously theorized for new commercial entrants. The results also indicate that net employment effect per social firm entrant is larger than for commercial firms. The study provides a first empirical assessment of employment creation effects of new social firms and contributes to a more nuanced theoretical understanding of employment effects across types of entrants. By specifying the economic contribution of social firms our study can open up a new track in social entrepreneurship research and provide important input to employment policy.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 2011
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 05-05-2021
DOI: 10.1177/10422587211010673
Abstract: The enabling influence of environmental changes—be they technological, regulatory, demographic, sociocultural, or otherwise—on emerging ventures receives a growing interest from researchers and practitioners. To support knowledge accumulation in this important area, we systematically review and integrate research that is dispersed across disciplines, nominal types of change, and theoretical approaches. Under a unified terminology within a cross-level (environment to agent), process-aware framework, we examine what has been done and learnt. On this basis, we develop an agenda for further, future accumulation of knowledge about the strategic and serendipitous influence of environmental changes throughout and beyond the venture creation process.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 07-2015
DOI: 10.1111/JSBM.12087
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2016
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 03-2017
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 07-10-2014
DOI: 10.1111/JPIM.12091
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 06-2018
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 2000
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 09-06-2009
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 17-07-2017
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 08-06-2020
Abstract: This article investigates how two types of proactive environmental strategies (PESs) – proactive green management and green political influence – affect firm performance directly and under varying conditions characterising corporate venturing activities (domestic versus international). The results obtained by analysing a multi-informant dataset reveal that proactive green management has a stronger positive impact on firm performance than green political influence does. Moreover, international venturing has a greater positive moderating effect than domestic venturing on the link between proactive green management and firm performance, whereas, domestic venturing has a stronger positive moderating effect than international venturing on the relationship between green political influence and firm performance. This article contributes by differentiating between two important forms of corporate venturing, by distinguishing two important types of PESs and by offering a more granular framework for aligning corporate venturing activities with PESs.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 23-09-2009
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 29-12-2020
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 06-2017
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-1995
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 19-02-2009
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 04-1997
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 03-2015
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 04-2006
Abstract: Institutional theory is employed for examining how and to what extent external pressure leads to changes in the venture idea during the start-up and early life of new, knowledge-intensive ventures. From a population of 321 young, knowledge-intensive firms that underwent a training program at Linkping University, Sweden, structured telephone interview data were obtained from 167 firms. The results confirmed that the venture idea had undergone more change in ventures that had more external owners, a dominant customer, and an incubator location. The results imply that institutional theory is a meaningful tool for understanding why and how venture ideas change over time.
Publisher: Now Publishers
Date: 2020
DOI: 10.1561/0300000096
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 2000
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 07-2016
DOI: 10.1111/ETAP.12152
Abstract: We hypothesize that a major macroeconomic crisis triggers four alternative responses among nascent entrepreneurs: disengagement, delay, compensation, and adaptation. We also suggest that commitment and ambition (or “high potential”) moderate these responses. Our most important finding is the relative absence of behavioral crisis responses. However, crises may make high–tech founders become more likely to disengage, whereas the opposite holds for founders far into the process. Our study sheds light on the mechanisms behind aggregate effects of crises on the number and type of start–ups in an economy, and can guide future research on the effect of crises on nascent entrepreneurship.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 16-05-2023
DOI: 10.1002/SEJ.1464
Abstract: The two premises that underpin this SEJ Special Issue on Environmental Change, Strategic Entrepreneurial Action, and Success are that all environmental changes provide positive potentials for some ventures, and that this has been under‐emphasized in past theory and research. After stating these premises and illustrating how present research treats the environment, we proceed to explain how the five articles selected for the special issue advance our thinking in this domain. We then broaden our discussion to how future entrepreneurship research can make further progress by studying interaction among environmental changes as well as their links to entrepreneurial agents, contexts (sectoral, spatial, organizational, etc.) and the entrepreneurial artifact (emerging venture). Throughout, the focus is on the enabling rather than constraining role of environmental changes. The COVID‐19 pandemic, the digital revolution, and the sustainability transition forced by climate change demonstrate significant business impact of environmental changes, including potentials for new business initiatives. This editorial and the five vanguard articles included in this SEJ Special Issue on Environmental Change, Strategic Entrepreneurial Action, and Success outline how future research can develop better theory and evidence on this important topic. The articles address matters ranging from how COVID‐19 facilitated some technology firms' recruiting and reignited media firms' dormant initiatives to how environmental degradations sparked entrepreneurial ecosystem development in Kenya, how the level of environmental dynamism at a venture's birth impact its current ability to benefit from change, and the consequences of passing on potentials provided by environmental change.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 31-05-2018
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-1991
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 05-2006
DOI: 10.1111/J.1540-6520.2006.00123.X
Abstract: This special issue is devoted to understanding the scientific structure of entrepreneurship research. Research in entrepreneurship has grown rapidly, encompassing multiple theoretical and methodological traditions. Articles in this issue use bibliometric techniques to find linkages among published entrepreneurship scholars. These analyses show that research in the entrepreneurship field contains: multiple but disconnected themes dominant themes that reflect the disciplinary training and lens of their authors and considerable dynamism and change in key research themes over time. These special issue articles provide rich opportunities for identifying insightful, influential, and creative research niches in the entrepreneurship field.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 06-1992
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 07-1994
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 09-02-2008
Publisher: Emerald (MCB UP )
Date: 2006
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 2013
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2017
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 15-11-2006
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 05-1989
Publisher: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Date: 2004
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 2014
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2015
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 11-04-2011
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2015
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 2013
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2021
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Date: 2009
Publisher: Now Publishers
Date: 2005
DOI: 10.1561/0300000005
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 20-10-2022
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2015
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 2002
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2014
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 08-2020
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 07-07-2021
DOI: 10.1177/10422587211030870
Abstract: Extending earlier critiques, I suggest that continued use of Shanian discovery and Alvarez-Barnean creation views and their respective standpoints on “opportunities” would constrain future entrepreneurship research. Instead, I suggest venture creation be recognized as the field’s true core, with or without the opportunity concept. Within a big tent of venture creation research, researchers with different knowledge interests and varying convictions regarding the roles of agency and structure in venture creation can partake in our most valuable contribution to the broader domain of economic and organizational studies: insights into the journey from non-existence to existence of new ventures.
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 06-2021
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 1990
Publisher: No publisher found
Date: 2006
Publisher: Inderscience Publishers
Date: 2007
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2022
Publisher: Emerald
Date: 09-01-2017
DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-11-2015-0256
Abstract: The majority of emerging and young firms work under resource constraints. This has made researchers highlight the importance of resourcefulness. Perhaps the most important theoretical development in this context is the emerging, behavioral theory of entrepreneurial bricolage. However, although academic interest is increasing, research on entrepreneurial bricolage has been h ered by the lack of robust instruments that allow large-scale theory testing. The purpose is to help fill this void. The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and contents of a novel measure of entrepreneurial bricolage behavior and assesses its validity. The measure is intended to be applicable in broadly based, quantitative studies. The instrument was developed as a unidimensional, reflective measure. Standard protocols for scale development were followed. The validation uses primary, longitudinal data from four s les of nascent and young firms as well as published, cross-sectional evidence from another four s les representing different contexts and variations to the data collection procedure. Promising results are reported concerning the reliability as well as the discriminant and nomological validity of the measure. Based on the pre-testing and validation experiences guidelines are also provided for attempts at further improvements. This paper presents a novel measure developed by the authors, which holds promise for being a useful tool for future research on the prevalence, antecedents, and consequences of entrepreneurial bricolage. Previously, no established measure of entrepreneurial bricolage behavior existed, and the few partial measures appearing in the literature have not been comprehensively evaluated. Thus, we offer a comprehensive and elaborate presentation of a measure only briefly introduced in Davidsson (2016) and Senyard et al. , (2014).
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 03-2021
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2021
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 2014
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 03-2014
DOI: 10.1111/ETAP.12079
Abstract: Evidence–based practice in entrepreneurship requires effective communication of research findings. We focus on how research synopses can “promote” research to entrepreneurs. Drawing on marketing communications literature, we examine how message characteristics of research synopses affect their appeal. We demonstrate the utility of conjoint analysis in this context and find message length, media richness, and source credibility to have positive influences. We find mixed support for a hypothesized negative influence of jargon, and for our predictions that participants’ involvement with academic research moderates these effects. Exploratory analyses reveal latent classes of entrepreneurs with differing preferences, particularly for message length and jargon.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 13-01-2022
DOI: 10.1007/S10490-022-09804-1
Abstract: Spinoff firms are a common phenomenon in entrepreneurship where employees leave incumbent parent firms to found their own. Like other types of new firms, such new spinoffs face liabilities of newness and smallness. Previous research has emphasised the role of the initial endowments from their parent firm to overcome such liabilities. In this study, we argue and are the first to show, that, in addition to such endowments, growing an alliance network with firms other than their parents’ is also critical for spinoff performance. Specifically, we investigate the performance effect of alliance network growth in newly founded spinoffs using a longitudinal s le of 248 spinoffs and 3370 strategic alliances in the mining industry. Drawing on theory based on the resource adjustment costs of forming alliances, we posit and find a U-shaped relationship between the alliance network growth and spinoff performance, above and beyond the parent firm’s influence. We further hypothesise and find that performance effects become stronger with increased time lags between alliance network growth and spinoff performance, and when spinoffs delay growing their alliance networks. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 09-10-2020
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2004
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 08-1995
DOI: 10.1007/BF01108619
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2023
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 07-2003
DOI: 10.1111/1540-8520.T01-1-00003
Abstract: This study focuses on small business managers’ motivation to expand their firms. More specifically, we examine the relationships between expected consequences of growth on the one hand, and overall attitude toward growth on the other. Data were collected in three separate studies over a ten–year period using the same measuring instrument. The results suggest that noneconomic concerns may be more important than expected financial outcomes in determining overall attitude toward growth. In particular, the concern for employee well–being comes out strongly. We interpret this as reflecting a concern that the positive atmosphere of the small organization may be lost in growth. We conclude that this concern may be a cause for recurrent conflict for small business managers when deciding about the future route for their firms.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 2009
DOI: 10.1111/J.1540-6520.2008.00283.X
Abstract: Strategic entrepreneurship can be described as simultaneous opportunity seeking and advantage seeking. Younger firms are generally more flexible and therefore enjoy “discovery advantages,” whereas established firms tend to be resource rich and more experienced and consequently enjoy “exploitation advantages.” The resulting evolution of the two important performance dimensions, “growth” and “profitability,” by firm age is not well understood. In this article we integrate several theoretical arguments concerning profit–growth relationships to develop a dynamic model of firm development, which suggests different development pathways for young firms. This leads to several unidirectional, competing hypotheses that we examine by studying the profitability–growth configurations of approximately 3,500 small firms and how these configurations evolve over time. We find that for both young and old firms a focus on achieving above–average profitability and then striving for growth is a more likely path toward achieving sustained above–average performance than is first pursuing strong growth in the hope of building profitability later. In line with our hypothesis we find that younger firms are over represented as “Stars” (high on both growth and profitability) and underrepresented as “Poor” (low on both growth and profitability). However, young firms in the “Star” category are also less likely than their older counterparts to maintain that position. Furthermore, our results indicate that young firms are overrepresented not only among “Stars,” but also among growth–orientated firms, regardless of the level of profitability. The findings strongly caution against the blind pursuit of growth for young firms, in favor of a thoughtful analysis of how both growth and profitability might be developed by firms. The results also question whether simultaneous high performance in terms of growth and profitability among young firms usually reflects a successful entrepreneurial strategy. The results can also be interpreted as luck on the part of a subgroup of young firms who indiscriminately pursue growth opportunities with varying profit prospects, and in many cases, the high growth–profit performance will be short lived.
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Date: 2007
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 03-03-2023
DOI: 10.1177/01492063221077210
Abstract: Abstract While prior research suggests that entrepreneurial bricolage is often useful as a coping mechanism for resource-constrained new ventures, other accounts document detrimental effects of bricolage. As the conditions for effective bricolage have not been systematically examined in prior research, we develop and test theoretical explanations for some important boundary conditions. We propose that while bricolage has a positive influence through a resource replacement mechanism, it may be detrimental through the intertwined “second-best solutions” and “tinkering trap,” which together lead to an accumulation of compromises that may result in a detrimental path dependence. We hypothesize that the intensity of these counteracting mechanisms differs depending on the venture's stage of development (nascent vs. operational) and its level of growth expectations. In essence, we argue that ventures expecting to achieve more derive greater benefit from resource replacement. In addition, they are more likely to resist an accumulation of compromises. We test our hypotheses using a longitudinal study of early-stage ventures. Although the results mostly support our theory, they also point to one interesting surprise for which we extend our theorizing to propose an explanation. Counter to the prevailing view in the literature, we find that bricolage is particularly effective for developing competitiveness for early-stage ventures striving to develop and grow. Complementing this, our results suggest the net effects of bricolage may actually be detrimental to the competitiveness of operational ventures that are not actively trying to grow.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 06-2022
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 2011
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 05-2005
Publisher: Emerald (MCB UP )
Date: 2003
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 07-2019
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 08-2013
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 2015
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 08-2017
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 08-07-2021
Abstract: We review new venture creation process research in leading journals over the past 30 years, applying a broad view of “process.” While we find a rich and varied literature with significant quantitative and qualitative growth, the review reveals considerable room for future contributions in this important area of entrepreneurship research. In an agenda building on review results, exemplary articles, and theory development advice from other sources, we discuss several types of such future contributions. We hope that our efforts can inspire emerging scholars, colleagues, research leaders, and institutional actors to contribute to a bright future for this core domain of entrepreneurship research.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2022
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2006
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 08-05-2016
DOI: 10.1111/APPS.12071
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 08-2018
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2016
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 03-2003
Start Date: 2009
End Date: 2010
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2014
End Date: 2016
Funder: Research Executive Agency
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2007
End Date: 2007
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2013
End Date: 2016
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 11-2013
End Date: 08-2019
Amount: $283,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2022
End Date: 12-2024
Amount: $203,448.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 10-2022
End Date: 09-2025
Amount: $278,495.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 07-2019
End Date: 06-2025
Amount: $3,981,223.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2006
End Date: 12-2010
Amount: $455,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 12-2007
End Date: 06-2011
Amount: $262,732.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2010
End Date: 01-2015
Amount: $122,500.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded Activity