ORCID Profile
0000-0003-1160-4128
Current Organisations
Monash Health
,
Monash University
,
Melbourne Shoulder and Elbow Centre
,
Alfred Health
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 12-2014
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Date: 2015
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 06-2014
DOI: 10.1016/J.JSE.2013.08.022
Abstract: Despite the lack of literature showing improved results compared with cemented designs, uncemented glenoid components are still commonly used in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Most studies comparing cemented with uncemented glenoids involve small numbers or include patients with inflammatory arthritis. New Zealand National Joint Registry data was used to compare the outcomes of uncemented and cemented glenoids in TSA performed for degenerative arthritis. Measured variables were the revision rate and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). Data were retrieved on 1596 patients, with a mean follow-up 3.5 years (range 2-10.7 years), 1065 of whom had a cemented glenoid. There were no significant differences in any preoperative factors between the 2 groups. The revision rate for uncemented glenoids was 4.4 times higher than for cemented glenoids (1.92 vs. 0.44 revisions per 100 component-years, P < .001). Age <55 years was an independent risk factor for revision (P < .001). The most common reason for revision was rotator cuff wear (35.5%) in the uncemented glenoids and loosening (36.3%) in the cemented glenoids. The difference in the mean OSS between the 2 groups was less than 1 point at 6 months (P = .109) and at 5 years (P = .377). Uncemented glenoids had a markedly higher revision rate. Patients aged <55 years have the highest revision rate regardless of glenoid fixation method. The higher revision rate in the uncemented glenoid group persisted when the effect of young age was corrected for. There was no clinically or statistically significant difference in the OSS results for clinical outcome between the two groups. Level III, retrospective cohort, treatment study.
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 06-2015
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2014
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Date: 2015
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 09-2015
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2015
DOI: 10.1016/J.JHSA.2014.09.019
Abstract: To assess carpal kinematics in various ranges of motion in 3 dimensions with respect to lunate morphology. Eight cadaveric wrists (4 type I lunates, 4 type II lunates) were mounted into a customized platform that allowed controlled motion with 6 degrees of freedom. The wrists were moved through flexion-extension (15°-15°) and radioulnar deviation (RUD 20°-20°). The relative motion of the radius, carpus, and third metacarpal were recorded using optical motion capture methods. Clear patterns of carpal motion were identified. Significantly greater motion occurred at the radiocarpal joint during flexion-extension of type I wrist than a type II wrist. The relative contributions of the midcarpal and radiocarpal articulations to movement of the wrist differed between the radial, the central, and the ulnar columns. During wrist flexion and extension, these contributions were determined by the lunate morphology, whereas during RUD, they were determined by the direction of wrist motion. The midcarpal articulations were relatively restricted during flexion and extension of a type II wrist. However, during RUD, the midcarpal joint of the central column became the dominant articulation. This study describes the effect of lunate morphology on 3-dimensional carpal kinematics during wrist flexion and extension. Despite the limited size of the motion arcs tested, the results represent an advance on the current understanding of this topic. Differences in carpal kinematics may explain the effect of lunate morphology on pathological changes within the carpus. Differences in carpal kinematics due to lunate morphology may have implications for the management of certain wrist conditions.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 08-2014
Abstract: Clavicle fracture fixation is becoming an increasingly common operation, with good clinical outcomes and a low rate of significant complications. However, there are several reports of rare but potentially life or limb threatening, neurovascular complications. Arterial injuries are usually pseudoaneurysms associated with prominent screws. These may be clinically silent for several years before presenting as subcritical upper limb ischaemia. Venous injuries are a result of tearing of the vessel wall by fracture manipulation, drills or implants. This produces intra-operative haemorrhage and potentially air embolism, which can be fatal if not rapidly recognized and managed. Brachial plexopathy is the result of traction on adherent plexus or impingement by fracture fragments or callus. It presents as severe arm pain and paralysis immediately postoperatively. Neurovascular injuries can be avoided by a combination of pre-operative planning, communication with anaesthetic staff and strategic surgical technique. The plane of the surgical exposure, release of the soft tissues, drill direction and depth and screw length are all important factors.
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Date: 2015
No related grants have been discovered for Harry Clitherow.