ORCID Profile
0000-0003-0481-7360
Current Organisations
University of Adelaide
,
Saskatchewan Health Authority
,
University of Saskatchewan College of Medicine
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Date: 18-07-2017
DOI: 10.1101/165019
Abstract: Ecologists are increasingly using technology to improve the quality of data collected on wildlife, particularly for assessing the environmental impacts of human activities. Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS commonly known as ‘drones’) are widely touted as a cost-effective way to collect high quality wildlife population data, however, the validity of these claims is unclear. Using life-sized seabird colonies containing a known number of replica birds, we show that RPAS-derived data are, on average, between 43% and 96% more accurate than data from the traditional ground-based collection method. We also demonstrate that counts from this remotely sensed imagery can be semi-automated with a high degree of accuracy. The increased accuracy and precision of RPAS-derived wildlife monitoring data provides greater statistical power to detect fine-scale population fluctuations allowing for more informed and proactive ecological management.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 12-2013
DOI: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2013.09.026
Abstract: Anthropogenic debris is ubiquitous in the marine environment and has been reported to negatively impact hundreds of species globally. Seabirds are particularly at risk from entanglement in debris due to their habit of collecting food and, in many cases, nesting material off the ocean's surface. We compared the prevalence and composition of debris in nests and along the beach at two Brown Booby (Sula leucogaster) colonies on Ashmore Reef, Timor Sea, a remote area known to contain high densities of debris transported by ocean currents. The proportion of nests with debris varied across islands (range 3-31%), likely in response to the availability of natural nesting materials. Boobies exhibited a preference for debris colour (white and black), but not type. The ephemeral nature of Brown Booby nests on Ashmore Reef may limit their utility as indicators of marine pollution, however monitoring is recommended in light of increasing demand for plastic products.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 17-03-2016
DOI: 10.1038/SREP22574
Abstract: Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) represent a new frontier in environmental research. Their use has the potential to revolutionise the field if they prove capable of improving data quality or the ease with which data are collected beyond traditional methods. We apply UAV technology to wildlife monitoring in tropical and polar environments and demonstrate that UAV-derived counts of colony nesting birds are an order of magnitude more precise than traditional ground counts. The increased count precision afforded by UAVs, along with their ability to survey hard-to-reach populations and places, will likely drive many wildlife monitoring projects that rely on population counts to transition from traditional methods to UAV technology. Careful consideration will be required to ensure the coherence of historic data sets with new UAV-derived data and we propose a method for determining the number of duplicated (concurrent UAV and ground counts) s ling points needed to achieve data compatibility.
Publisher: The University of Adelaide
Date: 2018
Publisher: Waterbird Society
Date: 12-2015
DOI: 10.1675/063.038.0406
Publisher: Canadian Science Publishing
Date: 2022
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-07-2020
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 08-07-2017
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 13-02-2018
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 23-01-2018
DOI: 10.1017/CEM.2017.426
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 02-2020
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 05-2016
DOI: 10.1016/J.CUB.2016.04.001
Abstract: The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), colloquially referred to as 'drones', for biological field research is increasing [1-3]. Small, civilian UAVs are providing a viable, economical tool for ecology researchers and environmental managers. UAVs are particularly useful for wildlife observation and monitoring as they can produce systematic data of high spatial and temporal resolution [4]. However, this new technology could also have undesirable and unforeseen impacts on wildlife, the risks of which we currently have little understanding [5-7]. There is a need for a code of best practice in the use of UAVs to mitigate or alleviate these risks, which we begin to develop here.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 15-04-2019
DOI: 10.1111/AEC.12756
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 10-03-2021
No related grants have been discovered for Jarrod Hodgson.