ORCID Profile
0000-0002-9187-5309
Current Organisation
University of Technology Sydney
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
In Research Link Australia (RLA), "Research Topics" refer to ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes. These topics are either sourced from ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes listed in researchers' related grants or generated by a large language model (LLM) based on their publications.
Environment Policy | Environmental Politics | Social and Cultural Geography | Human Geography
Expanding Knowledge through Studies of Human Society | Coastal and Marine Management Policy |
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 02-2017
Publisher: Resilience Alliance, Inc.
Date: 2020
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 11-2018
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 02-2017
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2013
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2015
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2022
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 11-08-2018
Publisher: MDPI AG
Date: 21-10-2016
DOI: 10.3390/SU8101062
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 04-06-2015
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 12-2020
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2022
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 05-08-2010
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 16-10-2019
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2020
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 10-10-2019
DOI: 10.1111/APV.12240
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 10-2021
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2015
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2021
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2015
Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
Date: 02-07-2021
DOI: 10.3389/FMARS.2021.634718
Abstract: Recently, oceans have become the focus of substantial global attention and erse appeals for “transformation.” Calls to transform ocean governance are motivated by various objectives, including the need to secure the rights of marginalized coastal communities, to boost ocean-based economic development, and to reverse global bio ersity loss. This paper examines the politics of ocean governance transformations through an analysis of three ongoing cases: the FAO’s voluntary guidelines for small-scale fisheries debt-for-“blue”-nature swaps in the Seychelles and the United Nations’ negotiations for a high seas’ treaty. We find that transformations are not inevitable or apolitical. Rather, changes are driven by an array of actors with different objectives and varying degrees of power. Objectives are articulated and negotiated through interactions that may reassemble rights, access, and control however, there is also the potential that existing conditions become further entrenched rather than transformed at all. In particular, our analysis suggests that: (1) efforts to transform are situated in contested, historical landscapes that bias the trajectory of transformation, (2) power dynamics shape whose agendas and narratives drive transformational change, and (3) transformations create uneven distributions of costs and benefits that can facilitate or stall progress toward intended goals. As competing interests over ocean spaces continue to grow in the coming decades, understanding the processes through which ocean governance transformations can occur—and making the politics of transformative change more explicit—will be critical for realizing equitable ocean governance.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2021
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 02-2019
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 04-05-2019
DOI: 10.1111/FAF.12370
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2014
Publisher: Ubiquity Press, Ltd.
Date: 09-2017
DOI: 10.18352/IJC.758
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 05-2019
Publisher: Resilience Alliance, Inc.
Date: 2018
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 03-06-2022
DOI: 10.1007/S13280-021-01563-5
Abstract: Community-based approaches to fisheries management has emerged as a mainstream strategy to govern dispersed, erse and dynamic small scale fisheries. However, lifying local community led sustainability outcomes remains an enduring challenge. We seek to fill a theoretical gap in the conceptualization of ‘scaling up community-based fisheries management’. We draw on literature of agriculture innovations to provide a framework that takes into account process-driven and structural change occurring across multiple levels of governance, as well as different phases of scaling. We hypothesize that successful scaling requires engagement with all aspects of a governing regime, coalescing a range of actors, and therefore, is an enterprise that is larger than its parts. To demonstrate where the framework offers value, we illustrate the development of community-based fisheries management in Vanuatu according to the framework’s main scaling dimensions.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 02-2016
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 2013
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2012
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2019
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2019
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 16-10-2019
Publisher: Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural Research
Date: 31-12-2021
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 16-10-2018
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 30-10-2017
Publisher: MDPI AG
Date: 11-2019
DOI: 10.3390/SU11216090
Abstract: Sustainable fishery management is a complex multi-sectoral challenge requiring substantial interagency coordination, collaboration, and knowledge sharing. While scholars of public management network theory and natural resource management have identified trust as one of the key ideational network properties that facilitates such interaction, relatively few studies have operationalized and measured the multiple dimensions of trust and their influence on collaboration. This article presents the results of an exploratory study examining the Gulf of Mexico fishery management network comprised of more than 30 stakeholder organizations. Using an empirically validated survey instrument, the distribution of four types of trust, three gradations of influence, and the degree of formality and informality in actor communications were assessed across the fishery public management network. The analysis reveals generally low levels of interorganizational procedural trust and a high degree of network fragmentation along the international border. Civil servants based at U.S. organizations reported nearly no interactions with Mexican agencies, and vice versa. Rational (calculative) trust was the most important in bringing about reported change in other organizations, while dispositional distrust and affinitive (relational) trust also had significant effects. The results suggest that, although transactional interorganizational relationships prevail in Gulf of Mexico fishery governance, well-developed professional relationships contribute meaningfully to the reported success of public fishery network management and warrants further policy attention in order to help ensure sustainability.
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2017
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2015
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 22-04-2020
DOI: 10.1111/FAF.12462
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 12-11-2022
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2020
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 22-09-2021
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 02-2021
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 15-12-2018
DOI: 10.1111/FAF.12262
Start Date: 02-2020
End Date: 02-2023
Amount: $393,748.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded Activity