ORCID Profile
0000-0003-3666-8531
Current Organisation
Medical University of South Carolina - College of Health Professions
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Date: 11-12-2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.12.11.422006
Abstract: Voluntary movements are accompanied by an increase in gamma-band oscillatory activity (60-100Hz) and a strong desynchronization of beta-band activity (13-30Hz) in the motor system at both the cortical and subcortical level. Conversely, successful motor inhibition is associated with increased beta power in a fronto-basal-ganglia network. Intriguingly, gamma activity also increases in response to a stop-signal. In this study, we used transcranial alternating current stimulation to drive beta and gamma oscillations to investigate whether these frequencies are causally related to motor inhibition. We found that 20Hz stimulation targeted at the pre-supplementary motor area enhanced inhibition and increased beta oscillatory activity around the time of the stop-signal in trials directly following stimulation. In contrast, 70Hz stimulation seemed to slow down the braking process, and predominantly affected go task performance. These results demonstrate that the effects of tACS are state-dependent and that especially fronto-central beta activity is a functional marker for successful motor inhibition.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 05-2022
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 04-2016
DOI: 10.1016/J.CORTEX.2016.02.007
Abstract: Even though it has been suggested that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) are highly involved in the planning of bimanual movements, the exact nature (facilitatory or inhibitory) of their role is not well understood. Using a dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigm, we examined the functional influence from DLPFC and PMd to the contralateral primary cortex (M1) during the preparation of a complex bimanual coordination task in which inter-hand movement frequency was manipulated. Only the left PMd showed inter-hand frequency-specific modulations in the interaction with the contralateral M1. Left PMd-right M1 interaction became facilitatory during the preparation phase when the left hand had to move faster than the right hand, while inhibitory modulation was observed when the movement frequency arrangement was reversed. Interestingly, bilateral DLPFC showed a facilitatory interaction with the contralateral M1s during the preparation period only in difficult conditions, irrespective of the inter-hand frequency ratio, suggesting a less task-specific role in the organization of complex bimanual actions. Observed task-related modulations in DLPFC-M1 and left PMd-right M1 interactions during preparation were significantly correlated with up-coming performance, predicting successful bimanual movements. These observations highlight the distinct roles of DLPFC and left PMd in the preparation of bimanual movements that require a differential contribution of each limb.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2016
DOI: 10.1016/J.BRS.2016.04.009
Abstract: To evaluate a modified electrode montage with respect to its effect on tACS-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability and discomfort caused by neurosensory side effects accompanying stimulation. In a double-blind cross-over design, the classical electrode montage for primary motor cortex (M1) stimulation (two patch electrodes over M1 and contralateral supraorbital area) was compared with an M1 centre-ring montage. Corticospinal excitability was evaluated before, during, immediately after and 15 minutes after tACS (10 min., 20 Hz vs. 30 s low-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation). Corticospinal excitability increased significantly during and immediately after tACS with the centre-ring montage. This was not the case with the classical montage or tRNS stimulation. Level of discomfort was rated on average lower with the centre-ring montage. In comparison to the classic montage, the M1 centre-ring montage enables a more focal stimulation of the target area and, at the same time, significantly reduces neurosensory side effects, essential for placebo-controlled study designs.
Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Date: 09-09-2016
Location: United States of America
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
No related grants have been discovered for Kirstin-Friederike Heise.