ORCID Profile
0000-0001-8992-2463
Current Organisation
University of Tasmania Launceston Campus
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 09-12-2021
Publisher: Springer Singapore
Date: 26-10-2016
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 06-09-2022
DOI: 10.1177/14733250221124207
Abstract: A common task in encounters with professionals is to identify a matter warranting professional assistance. Co-producing a ‘social workable’ matter in social work encounters as an interactional achievement is yet to be explored. Specifying this as an institutional and interactional project creates the opportunity to analyse how topics are collaboratively used in social work encounters to achieve a joint understanding of the work for the session. Such projects offer insights into the social actions involved in identifying matters that are relevant to the service, setting and professional encounter. Conversation analysis (CA) of real-world social work sessions offers a way to understand how social workers and clients produce, elaborate and pursue topics as a collaborative achievement. This detailed analytic approach illuminates how social workable matters are co-produced in interaction and creates an opportunity to examine and improve collaboration in interpersonal practice contexts.
Publisher: F1000 Research Ltd
Date: 2021
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 28-10-2014
DOI: 10.1111/CHSO.12103
Publisher: MDPI AG
Date: 18-10-2019
Abstract: The dominant discourse of gender focuses on the binary of woman/man, despite the known additional risks for erse sexualities and gender minorities in disasters. Given the small but growing body of literature concerning gender minorities in disasters, this paper sets out to explore the place of sex and gender minorities in disasters and to examine whether a binary definition needs to be extended. A five-stage rapid review was undertaken following Arksey and O’Malley’s method. Peer-reviewed journal articles in English language were sought that included disaster and gender terms in the title, abstract, and/or body of the article published between January 2015 and March 2019. The search included MEDLINE and Scopus databases. Relevant information from the studies were charted in Microsoft Excel, and results were summarized using a descriptive analytical method. In total, 729 records were identified 248 that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded and 166 duplicates were removed. A total of 315 records were sourced and their full text was reviewed. Of those, only 12 journal articles included content relative to more than two genders. We also recognized that sex and gender terms were used interchangeably with no clear differentiation between the two. We recommend that disaster scholars and practitioners adopt correct terminology and expand their definition of gender beyond the binary utilize work on gender fluidity and ersity and apply this to disaster research, policy, and practice.
Publisher: University of Otago Library
Date: 02-05-2021
DOI: 10.11157/ANZSWJ-VOL33ISS1ID826
Abstract: This last year, our lives have been turned upside down by Covid-19 and the public health responses needed to keep our communities safe. Most of us probablyhad little awareness of public health before this. At the height of lockdown, and almost overnight, public health had become a topic of daily conversation suddenly, everyone was talking about epidemiology, and disease modelling. The pandemic turned public health from obscurity into a focusof intense and life-saving relevance, taking public health professionals a bit by surprise everyone from chief medical officers to epidemiologists were getting crash courses in media interviews and press conferences. Skilled health communicators such as Siouxie Wiles in Aotearoa New Zealand and Norman Swan in Australia became crucial interpreters for the wider community inthe face of complex information about the pandemic. While many social workers may not know a lot about public health, either as a discipline or specialisation of medical practice, there are substantial points of connection with our profession—enough to consider that social work and public health are logical collaborators.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 06-12-2019
DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2019.1699205
Abstract: To understand how suspected suicides are investigated in New Zealand we conducted a thematic analysis of in-depth interviews with coroners. Coroners identified the inquisitorial nature of the coronial system and coroners' wide powers of jurisdiction as key strengths of the system. Important influences in key areas of coronial decision making in cases of suspected suicides included the need for more evidence - especially to determine intent, and family factors, including therapeutic jurisprudence. Coroners identified lack of follow up and monitoring of recommendations, poorly resourced coronial training and the personal impact of suicides as challenges of working in the coronial system.
No related grants have been discovered for Justin Canty.