ORCID Profile
0000-0003-1195-1998
Current Organisation
Duke Medicine
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 10-2013
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2011
DOI: 10.1038/MODPATHOL.2010.160
Abstract: The 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference in Boston made recommendations regarding the standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Issues relating to the infiltration of tumor into the seminal vesicles and regional lymph nodes were coordinated by working group 4. There was a consensus that complete blocking of the seminal vesicles was not necessary, although s ling of the junction of the seminal vesicles and prostate was mandatory. There was consensus that s ling of the vas deferens margins was not obligatory. There was also consensus that muscular wall invasion of the extraprostatic seminal vesicle only should be regarded as seminal vesicle invasion. Categorization into types of seminal vesicle spread was agreed by consensus to be not necessary. For examination of lymph nodes, there was consensus that special techniques such as frozen sectioning were of use only in high-risk cases. There was no consensus on the optimal s ling method for pelvic lymph node dissection specimens, although there was consensus that all lymph nodes should be completely blocked as a minimum. There was also a consensus that a count of the number of lymph nodes harvested should be attempted. In view of recent evidence, there was consensus that the diameter of the largest lymph node metastasis should be measured. These consensus decisions will hopefully clarify the difficult areas of pathological assessment in radical prostatectomy evaluation and improve the concordance of research series to allow more accurate assessment of patient prognosis.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2018
DOI: 10.1016/J.UROLONC.2018.07.013
Abstract: Inhibition of the receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) has become a standard of care supportive treatment to prevent skeletal related events in cancer patients. Moreover, RANKL inhibition has been implicated with better survival outcome in lung cancer, while RANKL expression induces tumor progression and metastatic spread in vivo in breast cancer. Whether RANK/RANKL may have an impact on the pathogenesis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is currently unknown. A retrospective tissue micro array (TMA)-study was carried out determining the expression of RANK/RANKL in primary tumors of 306 ccRCC patients. Additionally, 24 ccRCC cell lines were employed for in vitro analyses of the RANK/RANKL axis including cell proliferation, migration and anchorage independent growth. RANK (+) vs. RANK (-) tumors had both worse cancer specific survival (CSS) (6.3 vs. 1.3 years p < 0.001) and recurrence free survival (RFS) (9.9 vs. 5.8 years p < 0.001). RANK (+) (HR 2.21 p < 0.001) was an independent prognostic factor for CSS and RFS (HR 4.98 p < 0.001). RANKL treatment resulted in increased proliferation, soft agar growth, and colony formation of RANK (+) RCC cell lines, which could be reversed by treatment with an NF-κB inhibitor and with a combination of osteoprotegrin and RANKL in vitro. RANK is expressed in ccRCC tissue, correlates with clinicopathological features, survival outcome, and when stimulated with RANKL can induce ccRCC progression in vitro. Consequently, RANKL inhibition combined with standard of care treatment may be a promising approach to improve ccRCC patient's survival.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2011
DOI: 10.1038/MODPATHOL.2010.178
Abstract: The 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference in Boston made recommendations regarding the standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Issues relating to the handling and processing of radical prostatectomy specimens were coordinated by working group 1. Most uropathologists followed similar procedures for fixation of radical prostatectomy specimens, with 51% of respondents transporting tissue in formalin. There was also consensus that the prostate weight without the seminal vesicles should be recorded. There was consensus that the surface of the prostate should be painted. It was agreed that both the prostate apex and base should be examined by the cone method with sagittal sectioning of the tissue s le. There was consensus that the gland should be fully fixed before sectioning. Both partial and complete embedding of prostates was considered to be acceptable as long as the method of partial embedding is stated. No consensus was determined regarding the necessity of weighing and measuring the length of the seminal vesicles, the preparation of whole mounts rather than standardized blocks and the methodology for s ling of fresh tissue for research purposes, and it was agreed that these should be left to the discretion of the working pathologist.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2011
DOI: 10.1038/MODPATHOL.2010.156
Abstract: The 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference in Boston made recommendations regarding the standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Issues relating to the substaging of pT2 prostate cancers according to the TNM 2002/2010 system, reporting of tumor size/volume and zonal location of prostate cancers were coordinated by working group 2. A survey circulated before the consensus conference demonstrated that 74% of the 157 participants considered pT2 substaging of prostate cancer to be of clinical and/or academic relevance. The survey also revealed a considerable variation in the frequency of reporting of pT2b substage prostate cancer, which was likely a consequence of the variable methodologies used to distinguish pT2a from pT2b tumors. Overview of the literature indicates that current pT2 substaging criteria lack clinical relevance and the majority (65.5%) of conference attendees wished to discontinue pT2 substaging. Therefore, the consensus was that reporting of pT2 substages should, at present, be optional. Several studies have shown that prostate cancer volume is significantly correlated with other clinicopathological features, including Gleason score and extraprostatic extension of tumor however, most studies fail to demonstrate this to have prognostic significance on multivariate analysis. Consensus was reached with regard to the reporting of some quantitative measure of the volume of tumor in a prostatectomy specimen, without prescribing a specific methodology. Incorporation of the zonal and/or anterior location of the dominant/index tumor in the pathology report was accepted by most participants, but a formal definition of the identifying features of the dominant/index tumor remained undecided.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2011
DOI: 10.1038/MODPATHOL.2010.155
Abstract: The 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference in Boston, made recommendations regarding the standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Issues relating to surgical margin assessment were coordinated by working group 5. Pathologists agreed that tumor extending close to the 'capsular' margin, yet not to it, should be reported as a negative margin, and that locations of positive margins should be indicated as either posterior, posterolateral, lateral, anterior at the prostatic apex, mid-prostate or base. Other items of consensus included specifying the extent of any positive margin as millimeters of involvement tumor in skeletal muscle at the apical perpendicular margin section, in the absence of accompanying benign glands, to be considered organ confined and that proximal and distal margins be uniformly referred to as bladder neck and prostatic apex, respectively. Grading of tumor at positive margins was to be left to the discretion of the reporting pathologists. There was no consensus as to how the surgical margin should be regarded when tumor is present at the inked edge of the tissue, in the absence of transected benign glands at the apical margin. Pathologists also did not achieve agreement on the reporting approach to benign prostatic glands at an inked surgical margin in which no carcinoma is present.
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 10-2013
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2011
DOI: 10.1038/MODPATHOL.2010.158
Abstract: The International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in Boston made recommendations regarding the standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Issues relating to extraprostatic extension (pT3a disease), bladder neck invasion, lymphovascular invasion and the definition of pT4 were coordinated by working group 3. It was agreed that prostate cancer can be categorized as pT3a in the absence of adipose tissue involvement when cancer bulges beyond the contour of the gland or beyond the condensed smooth muscle of the prostate at posterior and posterolateral sites. Extraprostatic extension can also be identified anteriorly. It was agreed that the location of extraprostatic extension should be reported. Although there was consensus that the amount of extraprostatic extension should be quantitated, there was no agreement as to which method of quantitation should be employed. There was overwhelming consensus that microscopic urinary bladder neck invasion by carcinoma should be reported as stage pT3a and that lymphovascular invasion by carcinoma should be reported. It is recommended that these elements are considered in the development of practice guidelines and in the daily practice of urological surgical pathology.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 14-08-2017
DOI: 10.1038/NM.4378
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 10-2013
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 08-2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.PAS.0000128661.58697.7D
Abstract: Recently, it was reported that RON proto-oncogene, encoding a receptor tyrosine kinase, was strongly expressed in renal oncocytomas but not in any renal cell carcinomas, including 5 chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, which morphologically resemble oncocytomas. To determine its diagnostic value, we studied Ron protein expression by immunohistochemistry in a larger number of renal cell neoplasms with emphasis on chromophobe renal cell carcinomas. Tissue microarrays containing 141 renal cell neoplasms, including 55 oncocytomas and 52 chromophobe renal cell carcinomas, were constructed. In addition, conventional sections from 15 cases of oncocytoma and 5 cases of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry was carried out with a monoclonal mouse anti-human Ron-alpha antibody. Staining intensity was scored on a 0 to 3 scale. Ninety-nine percent of oncocytomas (69 of 70) and 96% of chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (55 of 57) showed moderate to strong, diffuse cytoplasmic Ron immunoreactivity with intensities > or =2, while only 17% of other renal cell carcinoma subtypes stained with intensities > or =2. Our study indicates that Ron immunostaining cannot be used to distinguish oncocytoma from chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 10-2013
No related grants have been discovered for Jiaoti Huang.