ORCID Profile
0000-0003-0686-948X
Current Organisations
NHS NSS
,
not applicable
,
The University of Edinburgh
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 09-06-2011
DOI: 10.1111/J.2042-7174.2011.00130.X
Abstract: To evaluate the views of patients across primary care settings in Great Britain who had experienced pharmacist prescribing. All Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (RPSGB) prescribers (n = 1622) were invited to participate. Those consenting were asked to invite up to five consecutive patients who had experienced their prescribing to participate. Patients were mailed one questionnaire and a reminder. The questionnaire included five sections: demographics you and your pharmacist prescriber you and your general practitioner your views and experiences based on your most recent pharmacist prescriber consultation and additional views. Of the 482 (29.7%) pharmacists who responded, 92 (19.1%) were eligible to participate, of whom 49 (53.3%) consented. Of those excluded, 193 (49.5%) were prescribing in secondary care and 171 (43.8%) were not prescribing. Between September 2009 and March 2010, 143 patients were recruited. Patient response rate was 73.4% (n = 105/143). Consultation settings were largely general practice (85.7%) or community pharmacy (11.4%). Attitudes were overwhelmingly positive with the vast majority agreeing/strongly agreeing that they were totally satisfied with their consultation and confident that their pharmacist prescribed as safely as their general practitioner (GP). Pharmacists were considered approachable and thorough, and most would recommend consulting a pharmacist prescriber. A slightly smaller majority would prefer to consult their GP if they thought their condition was getting worse and a small minority felt that there had been insufficient privacy and time for all their queries to be answered. Patients were satisfied with, and confident in the skills of, pharmacist prescribers. However, the s le was small, may be biased and the findings lack generalisability.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 05-09-2012
Publisher: Hindawi Limited
Date: 22-08-2021
DOI: 10.1111/HSC.13486
Abstract: Housing is a significant determinant of health and is widely accepted as a key solution to address some of the health disparities that exist among the homeless. It is estimated that 150 million people worldwide are homeless, and approximately 1.8 billion lack adequate housing. However, understanding of how housing has a positive impact on the health of the homeless remains unclear and underdeveloped. This systematic review investigates intervention studies that report on the physical and mental health effects of housing homeless persons. A search of PubMed, PsycINFO, EBSCOHost-Academic Search Complete and the Cochrane Library was conducted for peer-reviewed articles published in English from 1999 to 2020 that had a combination of at least one housing intervention and health outcome, with a homeless s le. Three previous reviews and 24 studies were included for analysis. Most of the studies (n = 20) encompassed permanent supportive housing interventions that emphasised placing homeless people with mental illness directly into affordable housing with access to support services. The primary health outcomes reported were general physical and mental health, well-being, and quality of life. Despite inconsistent findings and significant issues identified in the reviewed literature, housing (in the short term) improves some aspects of health in homeless populations with human immunodeficiency virus, anxiety and depression.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 22-05-2013
DOI: 10.1007/S11096-013-9792-X
Abstract: Under UK legislation, suitably qualified non-medical professionals can practise as prescribers. Few studies have explored the views of the general public towards non-medical prescribing. The aim was to explore the views of the Scottish general public on non-medical prescribing. General community in Scotland. A pre-piloted survey was mailed to a random s le of 5,000 members of the general public in Scotland. In addition to the items on awareness of and attitudes towards non-medical prescribing, respondents were asked to 'give any other comments, issues or concerns you have in relation to health professionals other than doctors prescribing.' Responses were subjected to content analysis. Key themes identified from content analysis. The overall questionnaire response rate was 37.1 % (n = 1,855) of which 27.2 % (n = 505) provided comments. Most were directly related to pharmacist prescribing (n = 312) while others referred to non-medical prescribers generically (n = 172) or other healthcare professionals (n = 79). Nine themes were identified: perception of knowledge and training support for a limited range of non-medical prescribing access to medical records motivation and convenience confidence, faith and trust privacy and confidentiality risks, controls and continuity of care supervision and conflict of interest communication and cooperation. The findings identify support for non-medical prescribing but indicate the need for non-medical prescribers to engage more with the general public. The comments also provide insight into the challenges for non-medical prescribers, as they strive to fulfil their extended healthcare roles.
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 23-04-2010
Publisher: African Journals Online (AJOL)
Date: 06-11-2015
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 07-06-2010
Abstract: To develop and validate an assessment tool, based on the 'Royal College of General Practitioners' (RCGP) Video Assessment Tool', for assessment of pharmacist prescribers' consultation skills. Competency areas of the RCGP tool were left unchanged but performance criteria for each were modified to reflect pharmacist prescribing. Each criterion and the overall consultation were rated from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). A purposive s le of 10 experienced prescribing pharmacists was selected. Each pharmacist identified, recruited and consented two patients. Video recordings of consultations were assessed independently by two randomly assigned GPs, experienced in the use of the RCGP tool, using the newly developed scale. Inter-rater reliability was assessed. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the assessor score with a patient satisfaction score. Spearman's rho was used to test the correlation between the two scores. The RCGP tool was modified to give the 'Pharmacist Consultation Assessment Tool' (PharmaCAT). The median overall PharmaCAT consultation rating was 3. There was good agreement between the two assessors for total scores (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.694). Fourteen (78%) patient satisfaction questionnaires were returned most (n=13, 93%) agreed/strongly agreed that they were entirely satisfied with the consultation. Correlations between average total scores on PharmaCAT and the patient satisfaction questionnaire were weak (Spearman's rho=0.142 and 0.242 for both assessors). The PharmaCAT has been tested in the pharmacist prescriber setting. The tool had discriminatory power across different domains and inter-rater reliability. The PharmaCAT has potential to be used as a formative and/or summative assessment tool.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 22-11-2016
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
No related grants have been discovered for Katie MacLure.