ORCID Profile
0000-0001-8791-9471
Current Organisation
Federation University
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 10-2021
Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
Date: 26-04-2022
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-05-2022
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 22-10-2021
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 10-2019
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 12-12-2022
Publisher: Human Kinetics
Date: 03-2019
Abstract: The power clean and other weightlifting movements are commonly used in the development of muscle power. However, there is a paucity of research examining the use of the hook grip (HG) in weightlifting performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare 1-repetition maximum (1RM) and kinetic, kinematic, and qualitative variables across a range of loads (75-100%) during power-clean performance with an HG and a closed grip. A total of 11 well-trained men (power-clean 1RM = 113.4 [15.9] kg, 1.34 × body mass) with at least 3 mo of HG experience volunteered to participate. Following a familiarization session, 1RM testing with the HG and closed grip were completed 5-7 d apart in a randomized order. Barbell kinetic and kinematic variables were recorded via a force platform and dual linear position transducer system. All subjects had a greater 1RM with the HG than with the closed grip (P < .001, effect size [ES] = 0.43). Peak velocity (ES = 0.41-0.70), peak power (ES = 0.43-0.61), peak force (ES = 0.50-0.57), and catch height (ES = 0.40-0.96) were significantly greater (P < .05) when using the HG at all or most of the submaximal intensities. In addition, subjects reported significantly greater perceptions of grip security, power, and technical competency at submaximal but not maximal loads. Athletes and coaches who implement weightlifting movements in their physical preparation should adopt the HG where possible. Furthermore, researchers and sport scientists should control and report the grip type used when performing weightlifting-type movements.
Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
Date: 12-05-2023
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 29-09-2022
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 20-04-2020
Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
Date: 17-02-2023
Publisher: Brock University Library
Date: 11-02-2022
Abstract: Traditionally, the field of sports science has been interested in conducting research that is predominately quantitative in nature. Although this approach has provided significant findings, this has led to expert coaches’ experiential knowledge being neglected in favour of empirical knowledge. By investigating punching in boxing, we are interested in developing an understanding of whether elite coaches, through their experiential knowledge, intuitively identify key characteristics of effective punching as identified in controlled experimental research. For this purpose, five interviews were conducted with professional and amateur boxing coaches. From this qualitative approach it was evident that coaches’ knowledge was consistent with that of the empirical research on effective punching performance with four principal components emerging from the interview data. These included: 1) whole body movement, 2) footwork, 3) hip and shoulder rotation, and 4) hand and arm position. The data illuminated how coaches’ knowledge can be used to strengthen empirical findings in sports performance, in this case punching in boxing. Additionally, characteristics of performance that were discussed by coaches that were not identified in the empirical literature highlight directions for further research regarding effective punching technique, an area that requires further investigation before conclusive structures of good practice can be applied.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2022
Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
Date: 03-03-2023
DOI: 10.3389/FEDUC.2023.1125259
Abstract: Exercise and Sport Science (EXSS) is a common degree offered at Australian universities, yet there is no systematic overview of this multidisciplinary field of study. This study aimed to determine the broad curriculum content of Australian EXSS degrees by summarizing the units offered, identify most commonly delivered content areas, and capture course information such as work-integrated learning (WIL) requirements and majors offered. Data were gathered through publicly available university course pages, with 30 EXSS courses included and only core units identified. The most common Australian EXSS units were “Exercise Physiology,” “Biomechanics,” “Research Methods and Data Analysis,” “Exercise Prescription and Delivery,” and “Exercise and Sport Psychology.” WIL requirements ranged from 140 to 300 h per course, and five courses offered majors. This study provides an overview of Australian EXSS courses, with the focus on exercise-related components reflecting accreditation requirements. Future research should examine how these courses equip students for the multidisciplinary EXSS industry.
No related grants have been discovered for Riki Lindsay.