ORCID Profile
0000-0002-8209-2783
Current Organisation
University of California, San Diego
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 24-11-2022
Abstract: Recent observations have shown that the environmental quenching of galaxies at z ∼ 1 is qualitatively different to that in the local Universe. However, the physical origin of these differences has not yet been elucidated. In addition, while low-redshift comparisons between observed environmental trends and the predictions of cosmological hydrodynamical simulations are now routine, there have been relatively few comparisons at higher redshifts to date. Here we confront three state-of-the-art suites of simulations (BAHAMAS+MACSIS, EAGLE+Hydrangea, IllustrisTNG) with state-of-the-art observations of the field and cluster environments from the COSMOS/UltraVISTA and GOGREEN surveys, respectively, at z ∼ 1 to assess the realism of the simulations and gain insight into the evolution of environmental quenching. We show that while the simulations generally reproduce the stellar content and the stellar mass functions of quiescent and star-forming galaxies in the field, all the simulations struggle to capture the observed quenching of satellites in the cluster environment, in that they are overly efficient at quenching low-mass satellites. Furthermore, two of the suites do not sufficiently quench the highest mass galaxies in clusters, perhaps a result of insufficient feedback from AGN. The origin of the discrepancy at low stellar masses ($M_* \\lesssim 10^{10}$ M⊙), which is present in all the simulations in spite of large differences in resolution, feedback implementations, and hydrodynamical solvers, is unclear. The next generation of simulations, which will push to significantly higher resolution and also include explicit modelling of the cold interstellar medium, may help us to shed light on the low-mass tension.
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 08-2022
Abstract: We model satellite quenching at z ∼ 1 by combining 14 massive (1013.8 & Mhalo/M⊙ & 1015) clusters at 0.8 & z & 1.3 from the GOGREEN and GCLASS surveys with accretion histories of 56 redshift-matched analogues from the IllustrisTNG simulation. Our fiducial model, which is parametrized by the satellite quenching time-scale (τquench), accounts for quenching in our simulated satellite population both at the time of infall by using the observed coeval field quenched fraction and after infall by tuning τquench to reproduce the observed satellite quenched fraction versus stellar mass trend. This model successfully reproduces the observed satellite quenched fraction as a function of stellar mass (by construction), projected cluster-centric radius, and redshift and is consistent with the observed field and cluster stellar mass functions at z ∼ 1. We find that the satellite quenching time-scale is mass dependent, in conflict with some previous studies at low and intermediate redshift. Over the stellar mass range probed (M⋆ & 1010 M⊙), we find that the satellite quenching time-scale decreases with increasing satellite stellar mass from ∼1.6 Gyr at 1010 M⊙ to ∼0.6−1 Gyr at 1011 M⊙ and is roughly consistent with the total cold gas (HI + H2) depletion time-scales at intermediate z, suggesting that starvation may be the dominant driver of environmental quenching at z & 2. Finally, while environmental mechanisms are relatively efficient at quenching massive satellites, we find that the majority ($\\sim 65{\\!-\\!}80{{\\ \\rm per\\ cent}}$) of ultra-massive satellites (M⋆ & 1011 M⊙) are quenched prior to infall.
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 03-10-2023
Location: United States of America
No related grants have been discovered for Devontae Baxter.