ORCID Profile
0000-0002-5412-8929
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
In Research Link Australia (RLA), "Research Topics" refer to ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes. These topics are either sourced from ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes listed in researchers' related grants or generated by a large language model (LLM) based on their publications.
Political Science | International Relations | Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander sociology | Access to justice | International relations | Gender policy and administration | Political science
International Aid and Development | International Organisations | International Relations not elsewhere classified | Defence and Security Policy | International Political Economy (excl. International Trade) |
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 03-09-2018
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Date: 2017
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 03-09-2018
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 19-10-2015
Abstract: Over the past decade, significant global attention has been paid to the issue of ‘widespread and systematic’ sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV). To contribute to the prevention of SGBV, researchers have examined the relationship between the presence of armed conflict and the causes of SGBV. Much of this causal literature has focused on the in idual and group perpetrator dynamics that fuel SGBV. However, we argue that research needs to lay bare the roots of SGBV in normalized and systemic gender discrimination. This article brings back structural gender inequality as a causal explanation for SGBV. In order to better understand and prevent SGBV, we propose a critical knowledge base that identifies causal patterns of gendered violence by building on existing indicators of gender discrimination.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 05-09-2017
Publisher: Brill
Date: 09-06-2022
DOI: 10.1163/15718069-BJA10058
Abstract: Peace mediation is a professional practice that is increasingly reliant on thematic technical experts, including gender experts. The strategy of including gender expertise in peace mediation reflects the Women, Peace and Security agenda and the call to include dedicated gender expertise in all peacemaking efforts. Based on interviews with peace mediation practitioners, the article analyzes the role of gender experts in peace mediation. We argue that there is a tension between the art of mediation and the art of gender expertise that reflects the gendered power dynamics of peace mediation. We conclude that the strategy of appointing gender experts to peace mediation teams will not “dismantle the master’s house.” However, we acknowledge that without a gender expert very little will be accomplished on this issue. For peace mediation to address the gendered foundations of conflict we argue for the development of an alternate feminist peace mediation practice.
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 14-07-2015
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2017
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Date: 29-06-2021
DOI: 10.1017/S0260210521000334
Abstract: A growing body of scholarship connects the participation of women and the inclusion of gender provisions to the sustainability of peace settlements. But how do women's groups navigate gender power structures and gendered forms of violence within complex and fragile political bargaining processes aimed at ending large-scale conflict? The 2016 Colombian peace agreement, internationally applauded for its inclusion of strong gender provisions and women's participation as negotiators and peace advocates, is a significant case for examining these questions. Drawing on original case material, including interviews of key actors on different sides of the conflict – this article analyses the political bargaining dynamics within and among women's movements, the Santos government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia ( Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia, FARC). We argue that the inclusion of women was pivotal in transforming the elite bargaining process and power structures of Colombian society enabling a gender-based approach to the substantive peace agenda addressing transitional gender justice for sexual violence survivors and gender-equal redistribution through land and rural reform programmes. The study suggests that deeply situated political bargaining analysis is essential to navigating gender in elite bargains rather than a one-size-fits-all approach to inclusive peace.
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Date: 2015
Publisher: Brill
Date: 03-01-2017
DOI: 10.1163/1875984X-00901005
Abstract: In this article we explore the relationship between pre-existing patterns of gender inequality and the occurrence of widespread and systematic sexual and gender based violence ( sgbv ). We ask three questions: What do we know about the status of gender inequality in high-risk situations prior to the outbreak of atrocities (which include sgbv )? What can be done to understand the relationship between systemic gender inequality and the use of sexual violence in the particular high-risk situations? And what long-term approaches are necessary to prevent sgbv ?
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2017
Publisher: WORLD SCIENTIFIC
Date: 2018
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Date: 28-03-2022
DOI: 10.1017/S0260210522000122
Abstract: The Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda and women's participation in peace processes are strongly supported by states. Yet financing to support the implementation of WPS has lagged behind overt international commitments to the agenda. WPS scholars and practitioners have highlighted the funding shortfalls for enabling WPS implementation and continued under-investment in gender-inclusive peace. In this article, we ask how much are donor states financially backing the implementation of gender-inclusive peace agreements which they promote? We use a high ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation to explore the mechanisms of bilateral and multilateral financing for gender-inclusive peace. We trace to what extent international investments are supporting specific gender provisions in two progressive gender-inclusive peace processes, the 2016 Colombian Peace Agreement and 2015 Comprehensive Peace Agreement in the Philippines. In both case studies, we reveal a drastic gap between the international donor rhetoric and the funding. Patterns of financial investment do not follow nor support the life cycle of inclusive peace processes. We suggest key strategies for further research to address this policy and recommend that all gender provisions of peace agreements be monitored in-country and all gender-responsive investments be tracked and evaluated.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 12-05-2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 09-2016
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 29-04-2014
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 29-04-2014
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan US
Date: 2008
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 25-08-2022
DOI: 10.1177/10778012211024266
Abstract: This article explores the influence of victim-survivors as change agents through the examination of the case of domestic and family violence advocate Rosie Batty. Utilizing public policy and criminological theories, and drawing from interviews with Batty and policy actors, the article examines the “Batty effect” and the convergence of factors that helped drive significant social and policy reforms in Australia. The article considers how Batty reflects characteristics of the policy entrepreneur and ideal victim, and how the sociopolitical context at the time provided the conditions for change. We conclude by exploring the implications for victim-survivor led policy change.
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 21-01-2022
Abstract: Policy windows emerge through alignment among specific policy problems, political forces, and proposed policy responses. During policy windows, it becomes possible for change to occur, driven by the agenda-setting of policy entrepreneurs. We consider how the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) created a significant policy window. As we do so, we seek to advance theorization of the conditions under which policy change occurs and when it sticks. We ground this discussion in exploration of a salient policy matter: responding to violence against women (VAW). Shortly after the World Health Organization declared the spread of COVID-19 a global pandemic, in April 2020, Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuke, Executive Director of United Nations (UN) Women—the entity of the UN dedicated to gender equality and the empowerment of women—coined VAW the “shadow pandemic” and launched a global public awareness c aign. We review the advocacy work that led in 2020 to broader recognition of VAW as a significant policy problem. That advocacy has driven policy changes at local and national levels that are intended to have long-term, trajectory-altering impacts on reducing violence. We conclude by drawing insights to guide theory-driven empirical analysis of other policy windows.
Publisher: Bristol University Press
Date: 14-06-2023
DOI: 10.1332/239868021X16842395248135
Abstract: Governments worldwide are increasingly engaging service users to reform public policies and services and enhance public value. Survivors of gender-based violence (GBV) are one group seeking to be heard by governments and gradually being engaged to improve policy outcomes. However, the history of the victims’ rights movement and feminist scholarship on political institutions indicate significant risks for survivors in these engagements with the state. This article examines the nature of these risks and how they are experienced and challenged, through a case study analysis of the implementation of the Australian state of Victoria’s Victim Survivors’ Advisory Council. Analysing government reports and interviews with survivors and policymakers, the article investigates how the state asserts control over survivors under the guise of co-production, inadvertently compromising public value creation. Informed by a feminist institutionalist lens, our analysis finds that efforts to address the power imbalances and gendered norms reflected in the informal rules of co-production are likely to better realise public value in terms of improved outcomes for all members of society, especially those experiencing GBV. The co-production risks we highlight and the ways to mitigate them we suggest are also relevant to other areas of co-production with other marginalised service users.
No related organisations have been discovered for Jacqui True.
Start Date: 12-2020
End Date: 12-2023
Amount: $354,415.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 06-2015
End Date: 09-2021
Amount: $961,644.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2014
End Date: 12-2019
Amount: $380,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 12-2016
End Date: 12-2021
Amount: $553,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2024
End Date: 12-2030
Amount: $34,999,992.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 08-2021
End Date: 08-2024
Amount: $396,142.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded Activity