ORCID Profile
0000-0003-1065-9530
Current Organisation
Macquarie University
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
In Research Link Australia (RLA), "Research Topics" refer to ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes. These topics are either sourced from ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes listed in researchers' related grants or generated by a large language model (LLM) based on their publications.
Urban and Regional Studies (excl. Planning) | Land Use and Environmental Planning | Human Geography | Urban and Regional Planning not elsewhere classified | Social and Cultural Geography | Urban and Regional Planning
Urban Planning | Expanding Knowledge in Built Environment and Design | Urban Land Policy | Expanding Knowledge through Studies of Human Society | Economic Growth | Climate and Climate Change not elsewhere classified |
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 15-07-2021
Abstract: The financialisation of housing is seen to undermine tenants’ rights, affordable housing and planning controls in order to make housing and homes more amenable to profit extraction. However, the extent to which owner-occupiers themselves seek to influence urban development and planning processes to protect their housing assets has been less well-considered. Through an online survey of 1122 owner-occupiers in Australia, this article redresses this gap. By identifying the financial values participants attach to their home, and their inclinations to join resident action groups, we reveal that those with the strongest investment values are also most inclined to join resident action groups. Expanding conceptualisations of investors beyond institutional investors, the article reveals the agency of financialised owner-occupiers who, as investor-activists, seek to influence planning processes to secure the profitability of their own housing assets. The article thus reconceptualises resident action as a financial strategy to protect long- and short-term housing investments and, in doing so, charts the urban implications of financialised home ownership and investor subjectivities.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 27-04-2018
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 04-2012
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 05-2013
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 23-01-2020
Publisher: Australian Cities Research Network
Date: 2018
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 10-11-2021
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 09-06-2015
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 23-06-2010
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 25-07-2011
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 19-05-2018
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 14-03-2019
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 06-2011
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-2011
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 28-11-2018
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 30-04-2010
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 30-07-2019
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 05-2013
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 25-08-2017
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 27-03-2019
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 06-2013
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 24-12-2018
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 04-06-2019
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-10-2021
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-04-2022
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 07-2004
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 26-04-2012
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 05-03-2013
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-04-2014
Publisher: ANU Press
Date: 15-09-2022
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 16-07-2021
DOI: 10.1111/BRV.12776
Abstract: Artificial refuges are human‐made structures that aim to create safe places for animals to breed, hibernate, or take shelter in lieu of natural refuges. Artificial refuges are used across the globe to mitigate the impacts of a variety of threats on wildlife, such as habitat loss and degradation. However, there is little understanding of the science underpinning artificial refuges, and what comprises best practice for artificial refuge design and implementation for wildlife conservation. We address this gap by undertaking a systematic review of the current state of artificial refuge research for the conservation of wildlife. We identified 224 studies of artificial refuges being implemented in the field to conserve wildlife species. The current literature on artificial refuges is dominated by studies of arboreal species, primarily birds and bats. Threatening processes addressed by artificial refuges were biological resource use (26%), invasive or problematic species (20%), and agriculture (15%), yet few studies examined artificial refuges specifically for threatened (Vulnerable, Endangered, or Critically Endangered) species (7%). Studies often reported the characteristics of artificial refuges (i.e. refuge size, construction materials 87%) and surrounding vegetation (35%), but fewer studies measured the thermal properties of artificial refuges (18%), predator activity (17%), or food availability (3%). Almost all studies measured occupancy of the artificial refuges by target species (98%), and over half measured breeding activity (54%), whereas fewer included more detailed measures of fitness, such as breeding productivity (34%) or animal body condition (4%). Evaluating the benefits and impacts of artificial refuges requires sound experimental design, but only 39% of studies compared artificial refuges to experimental controls, and only 10% of studies used a before‐after‐control‐impact (BACI) design. As a consequence, few studies of artificial refuges can determine their overall effect on in iduals or populations. We outline a series of key steps in the design, implementation, and monitoring of artificial refuges that are required to avoid perverse outcomes and maximise the chances of achieving conservation objectives. This review highlights a clear need for increased rigour in studies of artificial refuges if they are to play an important role in wildlife conservation.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 03-2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 06-2013
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 26-03-2023
DOI: 10.1111/TESG.12556
Abstract: Universities are increasingly identified by planning authorities as catalysts for urban change. At a local scale, planning policy often positions the development of university sites as a way to reconfigure the social, economic, and built characteristics of an area. At a city‐wide scale, the development activities of universities emerge as central to wider metropolitan strategic ambitions. This is especially the case in cities, such as Sydney, Australia, where multiple universities are dispersed across the city. Increasingly universities have been identified in strategic planning policy as vital infrastructure able to influence the structure and function of the city. This paper reviews recent strategic planning processes in Sydney. Specifically, the paper reveals how universities emerge as central in pursuing global city status and economic performance, supporting existing centres and corridors, establishing new specialised centres and shaping a new urban spatial structure.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 12-2011
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 09-2011
Publisher: No publisher found
Date: 2023
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2021
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 12-2009
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2016
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 30-10-2023
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 30-08-2019
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 12-2010
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2018
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 21-12-2017
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 14-09-2018
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 26-08-2020
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2014
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 03-2016
DOI: 10.1111/GEC3.12255
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-07-2016
Publisher: Alexandrine Press
Date: 03-2016
DOI: 10.2148/BENV.42.1.72
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 23-03-2017
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 18-11-2013
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 25-07-2014
Publisher: No publisher found
Date: 2014
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2015
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 13-04-2021
Abstract: COVID‐19 has radically changed the higher education sector in Australia and beyond. Restrictions on student movement (especially for international students) and on gatherings (which limited on‐c us sessions) saw universities transition to fully online teaching modes almost overnight. In this commentary, we reflect on this transition and consider the implications for teaching the disciplines of geography and planning. Reflecting on experiences at the Department of Geography and Planning at Macquarie University, we explore a series of challenges, responses and opportunities for teaching core disciplinary skills and knowledge across three COVID‐19 moments: transition, advocacy, and hybridity. Our focus is on the teaching of core disciplinary skills and knowledge and specifically on geographical theory, methods, and fieldwork and professional practice skills. In drawing on this case from Macquarie University, we offer insights for the future of teaching geography and planning in universities more broadly.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 08-2011
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-2010
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 20-02-2016
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 12-02-2016
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 06-2008
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 20-03-2014
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 03-2005
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-2010
Publisher: Emerald
Date: 26-09-2023
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 19-06-2017
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 25-08-2023
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 27-02-2014
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 03-06-2018
Abstract: Placemaking is increasingly drawn upon by planners, city authorities and citizens as a means of reclaiming, remaking and regenerating urban space. Yet understandings of placemaking and the work it may entail can vary markedly. Often, planning discourse and placemaking literature conceive of placemaking as a singular material change to a landscape, a project that is complete once installation has finished. In contrast, we see placemaking as an open-ended achievement, constituted through erse and dynamic assemblages and realised through a multiplicity of post-installation labours. We draw on a case study of Newcastle, Australia, to highlight these labours, the affective, contingent work which brings together the human and non-human, the material and social, and the enduring and ephemeral, to make place. Through three citizen-led placemaking projects in Newcastle, we elucidate the importance of these assembling labours and argue for a more nuanced understanding of placemaking, its multiple and sometimes transient outcomes, and the role erse placemaking efforts may play in regenerating the city.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 06-06-2022
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 27-04-2017
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 22-09-2016
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 11-03-2014
DOI: 10.1557/JMR.2014.34
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-2009
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 06-05-2009
Abstract: This paper explores how formal and informal institutional arrangements are mobilised in unique ways to secure development approval on Sydney's fringe. The institutional configuration mobilised to secure approval rests on the identity and history of the developer and their project managers and their relations with state and development actors. This paper explores the differential enrolment of formal and informal institutions by those who principally operate within the area (local) and by those who have moved into the area from other regions (foreign). It becomes clear that local development actors are more likely to mobilise informal arrangements to secure approval, while foreign actors are more likely to use formal arrangements. However, this picture is complicated given that some foreign actors pursue local consultants in an effort to utilise existing development relations for their own purpose, while some local consultants avoid certain foreign developers for fear that existing relations will be damaged.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 07-05-2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 11-2012
Start Date: 04-2013
End Date: 12-2016
Amount: $155,925.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2020
End Date: 04-2024
Amount: $322,601.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2022
End Date: 12-2025
Amount: $987,916.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded Activity