Tim Murray

From Sydney to Sarajevo

Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Date: 05-1996

DOI: 10.1017/S1380203800000593

Integrating Archaeology and History at the “Commonwealth Block”: “Little Lon” and Casselden Place

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Date: 25-10-2006

DOI: 10.1007/S10761-006-0020-4

Melbourne's ‘little Lon'*

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

Date: 04-2000

DOI: 10.1080/10314610008596119

On Klejn's Agenda for Theoretical Archaeology

Publisher: University of Chicago Press

Date: 04-1995

DOI: 10.1086/204357

A Response to Chris McConville

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

Date: 10-2000

DOI: 10.1080/10314610008596135

The childhood of William Lanne: contact archaeology and Aboriginality in Tasmania

Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Date: 09-1993

DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00045725

Abstract: Excavation of a site not just of the ‘contact period’ but of contact itself gives a new view of those darkest years around 1840 when the remaining free Tasmanian Aboriginal people were tracked down and transported to death in exile.

Epilogue: why the history of archaeology matters

Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Date: 03-2002

DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00090037

Abstract: In recent years the history of archaeology has been enjoying something of a vogue in different research traditions, resulting in a wealth of new studies and publications. In the English-speaking world, our store of biographies and national histories has been considerably expanded by the five-volume Encyclopedia of archaeology (Murray 1999 2001). The Bulletin of the History of Archaeology has provided a much needed forum for research, and the AREA project — Archives of European Archaeology — has begun to explore a range of resources bearing on the history of archaeology in Europe. At the same time, archaeologists have continued to justify and to advocate the significance of ‘novel’ approaches to archaeology through partial histories of the discipline (the most recent being those associated with the revival of ‘Darwinian archaeologies’ such as Lyman et al. 1997).

Archaeologists and Indigenous People: A Maturing Relationship?

Publisher: Annual Reviews

Date: 21-10-2011

DOI: 10.1146/ANNUREV-ANTHRO-081309-145729

Abstract: Over the past 25 years the practice of archaeology has been transformed by a broader and deeper engagement with indigenous peoples around the world. Although there are real differences in the nature and consequences of such engagements in different national and local contexts, it is now more widely understood that archaeologists should recognize the significant role of archaeological heritage in the formation and maintenance of indigenous identities. This new understanding is expressed in the concept of “indigenous archaeologies,” and the bulk of the paper reviews the concerns and approaches that are encompassed by it. The concerns of indigenous archaeologies overlap with other disciplinary movements that have come into being over the same period, especially postcolonial and “engaged” archaeologies that stress the political significance of archaeological knowledge and seek to enhance its social significance. Some of the more important consequences of such engaged archaeologies are discussed, especially new developments in historical archaeology, and the potential for these next contexts of significance and meaning to transform the theory and practice of the discipline.

Tasmania and the constitution of ‘the dawn of humanity’

Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Date: 09-1992

DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00039442

Exploring the archaeology of the modern city

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Date: 06-2005

DOI: 10.1007/S10761-005-8141-8

Illustrating ‘savagery’: Sir John Lubbock and Ernest Griset

Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Date: 06-2009

DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00098598

Abstract: Much has been written about the extraordinary impact of Darwinism during the mid- to late nineteenth century, expressed in the scholarship of 'reception studies' (see for ex le Ellegård 1958 Glick 1988 Numbers & Stenhouse 1999). A significant focus has been on developing an understanding of the impact of Darwinian thinking on just about every aspect of Victorian society, particularly on literature, science, politics and social relations (see for ex le Beer 1983 Frayter 1997 Lorimer 1997 Moore 1997 Paradis 1997 Browne 2001). A great deal of attention has also been paid (by historians and philosophers of science) into the specifics of how the Darwinian message was disseminated so quickly and so broadly. Here the interest lies in the links between the rhetoric of scientific naturalism and the politics of the day, be it Whig-Liberal or Tory (see for ex le Clark 1997 Barton 1998, 2004 Clifford et al. 2006). A consequent interest lies in the ways in which science was popularised in Victorian Britain (see especially Lightman 1997, 2007).

Like WHAT? A practical question of analogical inference and archaeological meaningfulness

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Date: 09-0099

DOI: 10.1016/0278-4165(88)90010-4

Coming to terms with the living: some aspects of repatriation for the archaeologist

Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Date: 03-1996

DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00083137

: Recovering the Past . Richard A. Gould.

Publisher: Wiley

Date: 06-1992

DOI: 10.1525/AA.1992.94.2.02A00290

(Re) Constructing a Lost Community: “Little Lon,” Melbourne, Australia

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Date: 03-2003

DOI: 10.1007/BF03376594

Introduction

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Date: 25-10-2006

DOI: 10.1007/S10761-006-0017-Z

Razones por las que la historia de la arqueología es esencial para la teoría arqueológica

Publisher: Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)

Date: 24-01-2014

DOI: 10.5209/REV_CMPL.2013.V24.N2.43364

Benjamin Anderson and Felipe Rojas, eds. Antiquarianisms: Contact, Conflict, Comparison. (Oxford & Philadelphia: Oxbow, 2017, 226pp., 39 illustr., 4 in colour, pbk, ISBN 978-1-78570-6844).

Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Date: 11-2018

DOI: 10.1017/EAA.2018.49

Visions of archaeology. An interview with Tim Murray

Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Date: 26-10-2007

DOI: 10.1017/S1380203807002322

Abstract: Tim Murray has occupied a unique, and at times contentious, position within Australian archaeology. His primary interests in the history of archaeology and theory made him ‘a luxury no department could afford’ in the fieldwork-dominated atmosphere of 1980s Australian archaeology, though he has since gone on to establish himself as a leading figure in both Australia and the international community. The politics of archaeology has also been a central element of his thought through both his historical work on race and his engagment with indigenous communities in Tasmania. The breadth of Murray's interests and contributions to the discipline of archaeology emerges very clearly from this interview and highlights issues that remain of central importance to the discipline.

Evaluating evolutionary archaeology

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

Date: 04-2002

DOI: 10.1080/00439240220134250

Introduction

Publisher: Routledge

Date: 14-01-2010

DOI: 10.4324/9780203203019

Cambridge in the bush? Archaeology in Australia and New Guinea

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

Date: 10-1981

DOI: 10.1080/00438243.1981.9979829

The historiography of archaeology: exploring theory, contingency and rationality

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

Date: 15-03-2017

DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2017.1334583

Archaeology and the threat of the past: Sir Henry Rider Haggard and the acquisition of time

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

Date: 10-1993

DOI: 10.1080/00438243.1993.9980236

Monumentality and the development of the Tongan maritime chiefdom

Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Date: 12-2008

DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00097738

Abstract: On Tongatapu the central place of the rising kingdom of Tonga developed in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries AD. Marked out as a monumental area with a rock-cut water-carrying ditch, it soon developed as the site of a sequence of megalithic tombs, in parallel with the documented expansion of the maritime chiefdom. The results of investigations into these structures were achieved with minimum intervention and disturbance on the ground, since the place remains sacred and in use.

Writing Histories of Archaeology

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Date: 18-09-2012

DOI: 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199237821.013.0008

Abstract: This article critically reviews the different approaches adopted by archaeologists and other scholars in studying and writing the history of archaeology. Based on this, it places them within the broader context of the history of science, arguing for both radical and conservative roles for histories of archaeology, and stressing its great value in helping understand the social and cultural elements of archaeological knowledge. Histories of archaeology reveal a discipline in a ferment of change, but also in a ferment of self-discovery. Archaeology has touched and continues to touch everybody, and although much of it has become highly technical and arcane, the central elements of the quest for an understanding of the history of human beings have remained largely intact. In the late twentieth century, there remained a core of belief that only archaeology could reveal the evidence of the whole human story from prehistoric to historical times.

What is ‘European Archaeology’? What Should it be?

Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Date: 26-01-2017

DOI: 10.1017/EAA.2016.12

Abstract: ‘European archaeology’ is an ambiguous and contested rubric. Rooted in the political histories of European archaeology, it potentially unites an academic field and provides a basis for international collaboration and inclusion, but also creates essentialized identities and exclusionary discourses. This discussion article presents a range of views on what European archaeology is, where it comes from, and what it could be.

Poverty in the Modern City: Retrospects and Prospects

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Date: 10-2011

DOI: 10.1007/S10761-011-0157-7

Pushing the Envelope

Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Date: 11-1995

DOI: 10.1017/S1380203800000428

Abstract: I want to devote most of my comments on Rensink's interesting article to the issues raised by his review of current thinking about the Magdalenian of north-western Europe, rather than make detailed observations about the sites referred to in the text. I am particularly interested in ascertaining (as well as I can in such a limited space) the value of a concentration on the analysis of lithic raw materials as a way out of the theoretical morass he believes we have collectively become enmired in. In the course of doing all this I will advance a very simple proposition: that our salvation will spring from a comprehensive revaluation of the phenomenology of upper palaeolithic archaeological records, conducted against a background of concerted exploration of the presuppositions which currently pass for archaeological theory in this domain. Obviously salvation is not going to be easy to achieve, as witnessed by Rensink's brave but unsuccessful tussle with the problem of modelling magdalenian mobility. My central point is that given the magnitude of the task before us we should not expect early success, rather we should continue the process of reevaluation which he has begun.

Mr Miles, Mr Oldfield and Professor Huxley: Early Thoughts on the Origins of the Australians

Publisher: Ubiquity Press, Ltd.

Date: 2023

DOI: 10.5334/BHA-671

Inside Melbourne’s “Little Lon”

Publisher: University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

Date: 03-2000

DOI: 10.7202/1016525AR

The origins of culture history in prehistoric archaeology: rethinking plausibility and disciplinary tradition

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

Date: 08-12-2016

DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2016.1258325

Reviews

Publisher: SAGE Publications

Date: 08-1999

DOI: 10.1177/0725513699058000013

Decay characteristics of the eastern Lapita design system

Publisher: Wiley

Date: 10-2006

DOI: 10.1002/J.1834-4453.2006.TB00619.X

Reviews

Publisher: SAGE Publications

Date: 05-2000

DOI: 10.1177/0725513600061000009

The forced repatriation of cultural properties to Tasmania

Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Date: 12-1995

DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00082417

Abstract: A recent court case in Australia changes the established frames under which research archaeologists, parks administrators and Tasmanian Aborigines deal with the prehistoric archaeology of the island.

Oral Histories and the Archaeology of the Modern City

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

Date: 2010

DOI: 10.2104/HA100034

Aboriginal (pre)history and Australian archaeology: The discourse of Australian prehistoric archaeology

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

Date: 12-1992

DOI: 10.1080/14443059209387114

Expanding Horizons in the Archaeology of the Modern City

Publisher: SAGE Publications

Date: 06-03-2013

DOI: 10.1177/0096144213479308

Abstract: This article discusses some of the more important implications of a long-term research project into the archaeology of the modern city in Australia. It discusses how we can explore domesticity, community, family life, and issues of residence and mobility through urban archaeology, as well as providing evidence of larger issues about how and what people produce and consume in cities. In the five projects that followed the original research at Melboune’s “Little Lon” district, we developed new strategies to increase both temporal and spatial scales as we sought to focus on ways of reconciling differences in the resolving powers of different types of data. During the course of the nineteenth-century patterns of production, consumption, work, and residence changed across the Western world, and it became clear that comparisons between sites in Melbourne and Sydney (and later in London) were required to get a better understanding of the genesis and development of urban communities (and, at a more pragmatic level, to see whether it was possible to generalize about the composition of “working class” or indeed “middle class” assemblages). This article presents what is, in effect, a progress report on that broad comparative agenda.

The Piltdown man?

Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Date: 03-1994

DOI: 10.1017/S0007087400031691

‘Advancing the historical archaeology of Aboriginal Australia’: Comment on Tutchener and Claudie ‘Beyond ‘contact’ and shared landscapes in Australian archaeology’

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

Date: 17-03-2022

DOI: 10.1080/03122417.2022.2048456

La Trobe University

Location: Australia

View Organisation

University Of Sydney

Location: Australia

View Organisation

University Of Melbourne

Location: Australia

View Organisation

Linkage Projects - Grant ID: LP0882081

Start Date: 2008

End Date: 06-2014

Amount: $235,944.00

Funder: Australian Research Council

Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment And Facilities - Grant ID: LE0453714

Start Date: 2004

End Date: 12-2005

Amount: $205,800.00

Funder: Australian Research Council

Linkage Projects - Grant ID: LP0989224

Start Date: 2009

End Date: 12-2011

Amount: $214,140.00

Funder: Australian Research Council

Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment And Facilities - Grant ID: LE0237723

Start Date: 2001

End Date: 12-2004

Amount: $200,000.00

Funder: Australian Research Council

Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP0451076

Start Date: 06-2004

End Date: 12-2010

Amount: $365,000.00

Funder: Australian Research Council

Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP1093001

Start Date: 2010

End Date: 12-2016

Amount: $631,000.00

Funder: Australian Research Council

Special Research Initiatives - Grant ID: SR0354668

Start Date: 12-2003

End Date: 12-2004

Amount: $10,000.00

Funder: Australian Research Council

Special Research Initiatives - Grant ID: SR0354580

Start Date: 12-2003

End Date: 12-2004

Amount: $10,000.00

Funder: Australian Research Council

Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP0343013

Start Date: 2003

End Date: 06-2008

Amount: $518,300.00

Funder: Australian Research Council

Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment And Facilities - Grant ID: LE140100151

Start Date: 2014

End Date: 12-2015

Amount: $400,000.00

Funder: Australian Research Council