ORCID Profile
0000-0002-4618-6280
Current Organisation
University of Queensland
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 09-2005
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 11-2002
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-05-2016
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-04-2014
Publisher: Project MUSE
Date: 2005
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 10-2001
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Date: 09-2012
Abstract: In this paper, I examine the ways in which the relationship between spectator and screen has been figured in a body of recent scholarship on the cinema that both corporealises the cinematic event by focusing on the body of the spectator and the body of the film whilst, simultaneously, decorporealising it by seeing in the relation between spectator and screen the means to produce a new kind of properly cinematic thought, a new form of philosophy that can only be born out of this relation. Taking as paradigmatic ex les of the different ways in which this relationship has been figured in recent film scholarship, I examine the works of Sobchack and Shaviro as ex lars of the somatic turn in film studies, before going on to examine Deleuze's philosophy of the cinema. In the final section of the paper, I suggest, through an analysis of Gaspar Noé’s Enter the Void, that, firstly, the potential pitfalls of somatic film theory and Deleuze's philosophy of the cinema as a tool for filmic analysis can be avoided. I then go on to argue that these different approaches do not need to be held apart from each other and that Deleuze's formulations can usefully inform a somatic film theory if we reconfigure the way we think about the cinematic body, moving from a biological understanding of it to an anatomical one. This discussion of the anatomical body is fleshed out in particular via an in-depth examination of the work of Waldby on the Visible Human Project and I conclude by suggesting that the cinematic spectator can be re-imagined or reanimated as a synthetic product of techno-bio-cultural and cinematic processes.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2020
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Date: 05-2011
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Date: 03-2014
Publisher: Peter Lang UK
Date: 31-12-2020
DOI: 10.3726/B15246
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 27-07-2012
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-09-2015
Publisher: CAIRN
Date: 21-01-2015
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 02-2007
Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
Date: 2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 04-05-2018
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Date: 09-2008
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 09-2007
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Date: 05-2014
DOI: 10.3828/AJFS.2014.19
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2014
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 06-01-2014
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Date: 07-2008
DOI: 10.3828/CFC.2008.8
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Date: 05-2015
DOI: 10.3828/AJFS.2015.10
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Date: 05-2014
DOI: 10.3828/AJFS.2014.21
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 18-08-2016
DOI: 10.1093/FS/KNW184
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Date: 05-2007
Publisher: Project MUSE
Date: 2013
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 11-2011
Publisher: Electronic Book Review
Date: 2020
DOI: 10.7273/VVQZ-8173
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 10-2008
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Date: 05-2001
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 08-2002
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 24-09-2023
Publisher: Intellect
Date: 09-2009
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Date: 09-2011
No related grants have been discovered for Greg Hainge.