ORCID Profile
0000-0002-6101-0080
Current Organisations
UNSW Sydney
,
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University - Taipei Campus
,
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 10-05-2022
DOI: 10.1186/S12909-022-03435-2
Abstract: A rigorous faculty appointment and promotion (FAP) system is vital for the success of any academic institution. However, studies examining the FAP system in Asian universities are lacking. We surveyed the FAP policies of Taiwan’s medical schools and identified an overreliance on the CJA score (manuscript Category, Journal quality, and Author order). The potential shortcomings of this metric and recommendations for refinement were discussed. We obtained the FAP documents from all 12 medical schools in Taiwan, and analyzed their use of traditional versus non-traditional criteria for FAP according to a published methodology. The influence of the journal impact factor (JIF) on the FAP process was quantified by comparing its relative weight between papers with two extreme JIFs. To better understand the research impact and international standing of each school, we utilized the public bibliographic database to rank universities by the number of papers, and the proportions of papers within the top 10% or 50% citation. Compared with other countries, Taiwan’s medical schools focus more on the quantifiable quality of the research, mostly using a “CJA” score that integrates the category, JIF or ranking, and authorship of a paper, with the JIF being the most influential factor. The CJA score for an article with a JIF of 20 can be up to three times the threshold for promotion to Assistant Professor. The emphasis on JIF is based on a presumed correlation between JIF and citation counts. However, our analysis shows that Taiwan’s medical schools have lower-than-average citation counts despite a competitive rank in the number of publications. The JIF plays an unrivaled role in determining the outcome of FAP in Taiwan’s medical schools, mostly via the CJA system. The questionable effectiveness of the current system in elevating the international standing of Taiwan’s higher-education institutions calls for a re-examination of the FAP system. We recommend a reduction in the relative importance of CJA score in the FAP system, adopting more rigorous metrics such as the h-index for evaluating research quality, and supporting more research aimed at improving the FAP system.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 16-06-2019
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 13-06-2022
DOI: 10.1111/JCH.14524
Abstract: Hypertension is associated with the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). Evidence has shown that reverse dipping pattern, an abnormal increase of night‐time blood pressure (BP) comparing to daytime BP, is associated with cardiovascular events. However, the relationship between diurnal changes in BP and AF has not been sufficiently explored. This paper aims to cross‐sectionally explore the relationship between AF and ambulatory BP parameters, especially reverse dippers to the others, and further longitudinally analyze how BP patterns are associated to the risk of developing new‐onset AF. Between February 2012 and March 2021, five out of 412 patients were identified of AF at baseline four were reverse dippers (3.7%) and one was from the others (.3%). Cross‐sectionally, the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that reverse dippers were significantly more likely to have AF (odds ratio: 12.39, p = .030). After excluding patients with baseline AF, during the mean follow‐up of 4.6 ± 3.0 years, seven patients developed AF. Longitudinally, the multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that 24‐h systolic BP (hazard ratio per 10 mmHg: 2.12, p = .015), night‐time systolic BP (hazard ratio per 10 mmHg: 2.27, p = .002), and presentation of reverse dipping (hazard ratio: 5.25, p = .042) were independently associated with new‐onset AF. None of the office BP measurements were associated with new‐onset AF. While ambulatory BP measurements were better predictors for the incidence of AF, careful management is necessary for reverse dippers as they are at high risk of developing AF.
Publisher: Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute
Date: 05-09-2023
Publisher: Korean Society of Medical Education
Date: 12-2022
Abstract: Purpose: Workforce shortage is a contributing cause of health inequality in rural Australia. There is inconclusive evidence demonstrating which factors cause doctors to choose rural practice. This study’s objective is to determine predictive factors for medical students’ intent to work rurally and for graduates’ current rural employment location choice.Methods: This prospective cohort study, utilized data gathered from the University of New South Wales about students and graduates who had spent one or more years in a Rural Clinical School. Participants were final year students and graduates already working in Australia. Stepwise logistic regression was used to determine predictive factors for the two outcomes.Results: Predictors for student intent to work rurally are rural background (odds ratio [OR], 7.16 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.59–19.53), choosing to study at the Rural Clinical School (OR, 8.72 95% CI, 1.32–57.63), and perceiving rural areas as opportunistic for career advancement (OR, 1.69 95% CI, 1.15–2.49). Predictors for graduates currently working in a rural location are Bonded Medical Program participation (OR, 6.40 95% CI, 1.15–35.59) and personal altruism (OR, 1.91 95% CI, 1.02–3.57).Conclusion: While intent is predicted by having a rural background, choosing to study at the Rural Clinical School and perception of rural areas as having positive career opportunities, a current rural workplace location among graduates is predicted by holding a bonded medical position and a desire to serve an under-resourced population. Maintaining the Bonded Medical Program and clear communication regarding training pathways may increase numbers of rural doctors.
Publisher: Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute
Date: 17-10-2022
Abstract: Purpose: Undertaking a standard-setting exercise is a common method for setting pass/fail cut scores for high-stakes examinations. The recently introduced equal Z standard-setting method (EZ method) has been found to be a valid and effective alternative for the commonly used Angoff and Hofstee methods and their variants. The current study aims to estimate the minimum number of panelists required for obtaining acceptable and reliable cut scores using the EZ method.Methods: The primary data were extracted from 31 panelists who used the EZ method for setting cut scores for a 12-station of medical school’s final objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in Taiwan. For this study, a new data set composed of 1,000 random s les of different panel sizes, ranging from 5 to 25 panelists, was established and analyzed. Analysis of variance was performed to measure the differences in the cut scores set by the s led groups, across all sizes within each station.Results: On average, a panel of 10 experts or more yielded cut scores with confidence more than or equal to 90% and 15 experts yielded cut scores with confidence more than or equal to 95%. No significant differences in cut scores associated with panel size were identified for panels of 5 or more experts.Conclusion: The EZ method was found to be valid and feasible. Less than an hour was required for 12 panelists to assess 12 OSCE stations. Calculating the cut scores required only basic statistical skills.
Publisher: Royal College of Physicians
Date: 2019
Publisher: Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute
Date: 18-01-2023
Abstract: Purpose: This study evaluated the validity of student feedback derived from Medicine Student Experience Questionnaire (MedSEQ), as well as the predictors of students’ satisfaction in the Medicine program.Methods: Data from MedSEQ applying to the University of New South Wales Medicine program in 2017, 2019, and 2021 were analyzed. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Cronbach’s α were used to assess the construct validity and reliability of MedSEQ respectively. Hierarchical multiple linear regressions were used to identify the factors that most impact students’ overall satisfaction with the program.Results: A total of 1,719 students (34.50%) responded to MedSEQ. CFA showed good fit indices (root mean square error of approximation=0.051 comparative fit index=0.939 chi-square/degrees of freedom=6.429). All factors yielded good (α .7) or very good (α .8) levels of reliability, except the “online resources” factor, which had acceptable reliability (α=0.687). A multiple linear regression model with only demographic characteristics explained 3.8% of the variance in students’ overall satisfaction, whereas the model adding 8 domains from MedSEQ explained 40%, indicating that 36.2% of the variance was attributable to students’ experience across the 8 domains. Three domains had the strongest impact on overall satisfaction: “being cared for,” “satisfaction with teaching,” and “satisfaction with assessment” (β=0.327, 0.148, 0.148, respectively all with P .001).Conclusion: MedSEQ has good construct validity and high reliability, reflecting students’ satisfaction with the Medicine program. Key factors impacting students’ satisfaction are the perception of being cared for, quality teaching irrespective of the mode of delivery and fair assessment tasks which enhance learning.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 25-05-2020
DOI: 10.1186/S12909-020-02080-X
Abstract: This study aims to assess the feasibility, reliability and validity of the panel-based Equal Z-score (EZ) method applied to objective structural clinical examination (OSCE) of Chinese medical students and undertaking a comparison with the statistical techniques-based Borderline Regression Method (BRM). Data received from two cohorts of 6th and 7th year medical students in Taiwan who set the mock OSCE as a formative assessment. Traditionally this medical school uses BRM to set the pass/fail cut-score. For the current study, 31 OSCE panellists volunteered to participate in the EZ method in parallel to the BRM. In the conduct of this study, each panel completed this task for an OSCE exam comprising 12 stations within less than 60 min. Moreover, none of the 31 panellists, whose are busy clinicians, had indicated that the task was too difficult or too time-consuming. Although EZ method yielded higher cut-scores than the BRM it was found reliable. Intraclass correlation (ICC) measuring absolute agreement, across the three groups of panellists was .893 and .937 for the first and second rounds respectively, demonstrating high level of agreement across groups with the EZ method and the alignment between the BRM and the EZ method was visually observed. The paired t-test results identified smaller differences between the cut-scores within methods than across methods. Overall this study suggests that the EZ method is a feasible, reliable and valid standard setting method. The EZ method requires relatively little resources (takes about an hour to assess a 12 station OSCE) the calculation of the cut-score is simple and requires basic statistical skills it is highly reliable even when only 10 panellists participate in the process and its validity is supported by comparison to BRM. This study suggests that the EZ method is a feasible, reliable and valid standard setting method.
Location: Taiwan, Province of China
No related grants have been discovered for Pin-Hsiang Huang.