ORCID Profile
0000-0002-3877-6213
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 13-10-2023
DOI: 10.1002/LDR.4440
Abstract: Secondary aggregates (clods) attenuate wind erosion and land degradation by increasing surface roughness and reducing wind friction velocities at the soil surface. However, aggregates with low stability are erodible and may increase dust emissions by particle abrasion under saltation bombardment relative to non‐erodible aggregates. It is still not clear exactly how different secondary aggregate properties reduce, and in the presence of saltators potentially increase, wind erosion and dust emission. The objective of this study was to quantify the effects of erodible soil aggregates on the threshold friction velocities ( u *t ), aerodynamic roughness length ( z o ), and soil loss of loessial soils in the inland Pacific Northwest (iPNW) of the United States. The impact of erodible secondary aggregates in attenuating wind erosion was evaluated in terms of secondary aggregate lateral cover and density. Secondary aggregates were tested in a wind tunnel using five levels of aggregate densities. Secondary aggregates appeared to restrain wind erosion as z 0 and u *t increased with increasing aggregate cover, but may significantly change wind erosion patterns by releasing more fine dust particles by abrasion. We found that, while abrasion losses contributed up to 69.3% of total soil loss for a sandy loam, total soil loss still decreased for all soils. Aggregates with greater stability may reduce soil loss with increasing secondary aggregate densities, and the rate of reduction in soil loss was up to two times higher than that for soil aggregates with lower stability.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 23-06-2022
DOI: 10.1002/LDR.4220
Abstract: Agricultural land management strategies have been applied to minimize wind erosion in the inland Pacific Northwest (iPNW) due to their profound influence on various soil properties and crop residue characteristics. However, simulating soil loss in response to these treatment strategies remains a challenge. The objective of this study was to test the performance of the single‐event wind erosion evaluation program (SWEEP) in simulating soil loss from agricultural land under contrasting tillage, crop rotation, fertilizer, and green manure treatments in the iPNW. These management strategies appeared to impact residue characteristics but had little or no impact on soil properties except tillage treatments in the short term ( years). Tillage appeared to have a greater impact on soil properties and residue characteristics than other treatments. As a result, the performance of SWEEP varied among disk‐tillage (DT), undercutter‐tillage (UT), and NT (no‐tillage/zero‐tillage) treatments. No or little difference was found in the performance of SWEEP between winter wheat‐summer fallow (WW‐SF) and WW‐oilseed‐SF (WW‐O‐SF) crop rotations and synthetic and biosolids fertilizer treatments. In addition, the performance of SWEEP was acceptable for both crop rotation and fertilizer treatments. In contrast, poor agreement between simulated and measured erosion was found for manure treatments in which SWEEP over‐estimated erosion by 313 and 210% for no manure and manure treatments, respectively. The over‐estimation of SWEEP may be due to the over‐estimation of abrasion flux from the fully crusted soil surface. Our results suggest that SWEEP can be used to identify control measures for windblown soil loss in the iPNW.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 12-2020
No related grants have been discovered for Huawei pi.