ORCID Profile
0000-0003-4522-0210
Current Organisation
UNSW
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2017
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2959925
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 14-12-2011
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
Date: 03-09-0001
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 2000
Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Date: 03-2012
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 25-04-2011
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 27-02-2019
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2017
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3018534
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2018
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3256066
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2017
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3018214
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 02-08-2004
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Date: 19-11-2013
DOI: 10.1017/S2044251313000271
Abstract: A financial transactions tax (FTT) is a tax on wholesale capital market transactions, which civil society has long advocated for on grounds of social justice. This so-called “Robin Hood Tax” would take from the rich and give to the poor. Revenue estimates for a global FTT of 0.05 percent are around US$500 billion per annum. One-quarter of this revenue stream can achieve the first six Millennium Development Goals relating to poverty, health, and education. Even if the developed countries retain all of the revenue raised, the impost would see financial services institutions making a fairer contribution to the societies in which they operate. Thus, as an instrument of justice, the potential of an FTT is great—but, most of all, such a tax will enhance the operations of contemporary financial markets substantially. This paper explores the potential of such a tax, the arguments for and against it, and its feasibility.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2015
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2973806
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2022
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2017
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3211708
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2016
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2738330
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2014
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2491995
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 25-04-2011
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2019
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3380885
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 25-04-2011
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 25-04-2011
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 25-04-2011
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 25-04-2011
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2022
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 25-04-2011
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 06-2015
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2018
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3247455
Publisher: Elsevier
Date: 2018
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 25-04-2011
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 25-04-2011
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2015
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2676553
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 25-04-2011
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2017
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3088303
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 25-04-2011
Publisher: Elsevier
Date: 2018
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 25-04-2011
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 29-03-2012
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 25-04-2011
Abstract: Debt-for-development exchanges are an important financing tool for development. They make debt relief more politically and practically attractive to donor countries and serve the development of recipient countries through the cancellation of external debt and the funding of important development projects. This book commences by chronicling the emergence of debt-for-development exchanges from their forebears, debt-equity exchanges, and analyzes why debt for development suffers from very few of the problems that plagued debt equity. The book analyzes the different types of debt-for-development exchanges and the different ways they have been used by all donor nations that have made use of them. The book then explores a range of critical perspectives on exchanges and concludes by considering a wide range of new and innovative uses for the funds generated by exchanges.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2017
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3002927
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2015
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2660050
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Date: 06-06-2016
DOI: 10.1017/S0020589316000142
Abstract: The provision of financial services through mobile phones is a powerful tool to foster financial inclusion, and thus economic growth, in developing countries. However, it raises important regulatory issues. Given the vulnerability of most potential customers of these services, the protection of customer funds is important. In common law countries, trust accounts are an effective response to these concerns. In civil law jurisdictions however, in the absence of trusts, protection of customer funds is more difficult. This paper identifies the theoretical and practical problems that regulators in civil law jurisdictions might face when trying to protect customer funds and explores how fiduciary contracts, mandate contracts and direct regulation might be used to achieve this goal. It offers a series of practical recommendations for policymakers in developing countries that provide a range of regulatory options that combine private law and regulation.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2018
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3146666
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2017
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3072298
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
Date: 26-12-2014
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 11-09-2015
DOI: 10.1093/OJLS/GQV023
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 03-12-2014
DOI: 10.1093/CMLJ/KMU030
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 21-03-2013
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 11-12-2015
DOI: 10.1093/JFR/FJV010
No related grants have been discovered for ross buckley.