ORCID Profile
0000-0002-7045-6084
Current Organisation
Swinburne University of Technology
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-2009
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 07-1999
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2015
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 12-2006
Publisher: Intellect
Date: 06-2021
DOI: 10.1386/MACP_00048_7
Publisher: Emerald
Date: 07-07-2014
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 25-04-2017
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 07-2001
DOI: 10.1080/713657802
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 09-2000
DOI: 10.1177/135485650000600306
Abstract: Contemporary debates concerning hypertext theory often question the place of the written word in visual media. Contrary to this, I argue that hypertext is first and foremost a visual, graphical medium. It is a way of spatialising ideas into discrete units which might be grasped by the mind and efficiently retrieved along lines of connections: association. This technique has a long history. There is a strange continuity in metaphor between early associationist models of memory, classical Greek systems of place-memory loci, sixteenth and seventeenth century philosophies of memory retrieval and the history of hypertext. I argue that hypertext belongs to this lineage.
Publisher: Swinburne University of Technology
Date: 11-2009
DOI: 10.2104/TJA09040
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 23-02-2022
DOI: 10.1002/POI3.284
Abstract: Governments across the world are struggling to address the market dominance of technology companies through increased regulation. The Australian Federal government found itself leading the world in platform regulation when, in 2021, it enacted the Australian News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code. The furore surrounding the introduction of the legislation, and Facebook's subsequent Australian ‘news ban’ exposed the limits of a regulatory model that has previously left the tech industry to moderate itself. In this paper, we argue the introduction of the Code is a leading ex le of a global trajectory towards regulatory change, which sees governments move from a reactive regulation model to specific interventions around the governance of digital media spaces. We discuss how best to measure the successes and failures around this more interventionist model through a case study of the implementation of the Code in Australia. More broadly we consider how global platforms have responded, and whether the reform is an effective regulatory model for other national governments to emulate.
Start Date: 2009
End Date: 2011
Funder: Telstra Foundation
View Funded Activity