ORCID Profile
0000-0001-9272-0387
Current Organisations
University of Aveiro
,
Center for Health and Services Research: Aveiro, PT
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2019
DOI: 10.1016/J.BODYIM.2019.06.006
Abstract: This systematic review synthesizes and critically appraises measurement properties of influential body image measures. Eight measures that met the definition of an assessment of body image (i.e., an in idual's cognitive or affective evaluation of their body or appearance with a positive or negative valence), and scored high on systematic expert priority ranking, were included. These measures were: the Body Appreciation Scale (original BAS and BAS-2), the Body Esteem Scale for Adolescents and Adults, the Body Shape Questionnaire, the Centre for Appearance Research Valence Scale, the Drive for Muscularity Scale, two subscales of the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire, one subscale of the Eating Disorder Inventory 3, and two subscales of the Multidimensional Body Relations Questionnaire. Articles assessing these scales' psychometric properties (N = 136) were evaluated for their methodological quality using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist, and a best evidence synthesis was performed. The results supported the majority of measures in terms of reliability and validity however, suitability varied across populations, and some measurement properties were insufficiently evaluated. The measures are discussed in detail, including recommendations for their future use in research and clinical practice.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2014
DOI: 10.1016/J.CLINBIOMECH.2014.07.006
Abstract: Neural system mobilization is widely used in the treatment of several painful conditions. Data on nerve biomechanics is crucial to inform the design of mobilization exercises. Therefore, the aim of this review is to characterize normal nervous system biomechanics in terms of excursion and strain. Studies were sought from Pubmed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scielo. Two reviewers' screened titles and abstracts, assessed full reports for potentially eligible studies, extracted information on studies' characteristics and assessed its methodological quality. Twelve studies were included in this review that assessed the median nerve (n=8), the ulnar nerve (n=1), the tibial nerve (n=1), the sciatic nerve (n=1) and both the tibial and the sciatic nerves (n=1). All included studies assessed longitudinal nerve excursion and one assessed nerve strain. Absolute values varied between 0.1mm and 12.5mm for median nerve excursion, between 0.1mm and 4.0mm for ulnar nerve excursion, between 0.7 mm and 5.2mm for tibial nerve excursion and between 0.1mm and 3.5mm for sciatic nerve excursion. Maximum reported median nerve strain was 2.0%. Range of motion for the moving joint, distance from the moving joint to the site of the lesion, position of adjacent joints, number of moving joints and whether joint movement stretches or shortens the nerve bed need to be considered when designing neural mobilization exercises as all of these factors seem to have an impact on nerve excursion.
Location: Portugal
Location: Portugal
No related grants have been discovered for Maria Piedade Brandão.