ORCID Profile
0000-0002-3311-2944
Current Organisation
Duke University
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Date: 07-01-2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.01.07.475350
Abstract: Machine learning prediction algorithms such as AlphaFold 1 and RoseTTAFold 2 can create remarkably accurate protein models, but these models usually have some regions that are predicted with low confidence or poor accuracy 3–6 . We hypothesized that by implicitly including experimental information, a greater portion of a model could be predicted accurately, and that this might synergistically improve parts of the model that were not fully addressed by either machine learning or experiment alone. An iterative procedure was developed in which AlphaFold models are automatically rebuilt based on experimental density maps and the rebuilt models are used as templates in new AlphaFold predictions. We find that including experimental information improves prediction beyond the improvement obtained with simple rebuilding guided by the experimental data. This procedure for AlphaFold modeling with density has been incorporated into an automated procedure for crystallographic and electron cryo-microscopy map interpretation.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 05-2021
Publisher: International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
Date: 16-03-2012
DOI: 10.1107/S0907444911047834
Abstract: Traditional methods for macromolecular refinement often have limited success at low resolution (3.0–3.5 Å or worse), producing models that score poorly on crystallographic and geometric validation criteria. To improve low-resolution refinement, knowledge from macromolecular chemistry and homology was used to add three new coordinate-restraint functions to the refinement program phenix.refine . Firstly, a `reference-model' method uses an identical or homologous higher resolution model to add restraints on torsion angles to the geometric target function. Secondly, automatic restraints for common secondary-structure elements in proteins and nucleic acids were implemented that can help to preserve the secondary-structure geometry, which is often distorted at low resolution. Lastly, we have implemented Ramachandran-based restraints on the backbone torsion angles. In this method, a φ,ψ term is added to the geometric target function to minimize a modified Ramachandran landscape that smoothly combines favorable peaks identified from nonredundant high-quality data with unfavorable peaks calculated using a clash-based pseudo-energy function. All three methods show improved MolProbity validation statistics, typically complemented by a lowered R free and a decreased gap between R work and R free .
Publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Date: 07-10-2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.07.307546
Abstract: During the COVID-19 pandemic, structural biologists rushed to solve the structures of the 28 proteins encoded by the SARS-CoV-2 genome in order to understand the viral life cycle and enable structure-based drug design. In addition to the 204 previously solved structures from SARS-CoV-1, 548 structures covering 16 of the SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins have been released in a span of only 6 months. These structural models serve as the basis for research to understand how the virus hijacks human cells, for structure-based drug design, and to aid in the development of vaccines. However, errors often occur in even the most careful structure determination - and may be even more common among these structures, which were solved quickly and under immense pressure. The Coronavirus Structural Task Force has responded to this challenge by rapidly categorizing, evaluating and reviewing all of these experimental protein structures in order to help downstream users and original authors. In addition, the Task Force provided improved models for key structures online, which have been used by Folding@Home, OpenPandemics, the EU JEDI COVID-19 challenge and others.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 04-02-0100
DOI: 10.1038/S41592-022-01645-6
Abstract: Machine-learning prediction algorithms such as AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold can create remarkably accurate protein models, but these models usually have some regions that are predicted with low confidence or poor accuracy. We hypothesized that by implicitly including new experimental information such as a density map, a greater portion of a model could be predicted accurately, and that this might synergistically improve parts of the model that were not fully addressed by either machine learning or experiment alone. An iterative procedure was developed in which AlphaFold models are automatically rebuilt on the basis of experimental density maps and the rebuilt models are used as templates in new AlphaFold predictions. We show that including experimental information improves prediction beyond the improvement obtained with simple rebuilding guided by the experimental data. This procedure for AlphaFold modeling with density has been incorporated into an automated procedure for interpretation of crystallographic and electron cryo-microscopy maps.
Publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Date: 22-11-2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.11.21.517405
Abstract: AI-based methods such as AlphaFold have revolutionized structural biology, often making it possible to predict protein structures with high accuracy. The accuracies of these predictions vary, however, and they do not include ligands, covalent modifications or other environmental factors. Here we focus on very-high-confidence parts of AlphaFold predictions, evaluating how well they can be expected to describe the structure of a protein in a particular environment. We compare predictions with experimental crystallographic maps of the same proteins for 102 crystal structures. In many cases, those parts of AlphaFold predictions that were predicted with very high confidence matched experimental maps remarkably closely. In other cases, these predictions differed from experimental maps on a global scale through distortion and domain orientation, and on a local scale in backbone and side-chain conformation. Overall, C α atoms in very-high-confidence parts of AlphaFold predictions differed from corresponding crystal structures by a median of 0.6 Å, and about 10% of these differed by more than 2 Å, each about twice the values found for pairs of crystal structures containing the same components but determined in different space groups. We suggest considering AlphaFold predictions as exceptionally useful hypotheses. We further suggest that it is important to consider the confidence in prediction when interpreting AlphaFold predictions and to carry out experimental structure determination to verify structural details, particularly those that involve interactions not included in the prediction.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 03-2021
Publisher: International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
Date: 2020
DOI: 10.1107/S2059798319015134
Abstract: The refinement of biomolecular crystallographic models relies on geometric restraints to help to address the paucity of experimental data typical in these experiments. Limitations in these restraints can degrade the quality of the resulting atomic models. Here, an integration of the full all-atom Amber molecular-dynamics force field into Phenix crystallographic refinement is presented, which enables more complete modeling of biomolecular chemistry. The advantages of the force field include a carefully derived set of torsion-angle potentials, an extensive and flexible set of atom types, Lennard–Jones treatment of nonbonded interactions and a full treatment of crystalline electrostatics. The new combined method was tested against conventional geometry restraints for over 22 000 protein structures. Structures refined with the new method show substantially improved model quality. On average, Ramachandran and rotamer scores are somewhat better, clashscores and MolProbity scores are significantly improved, and the modeling of electrostatics leads to structures that exhibit more, and more correct, hydrogen bonds than those refined using traditional geometry restraints. In general it is found that model improvements are greatest at lower resolutions, prompting plans to add the Amber target function to real-space refinement for use in electron cryo-microscopy. This work opens the door to the future development of more advanced applications such as Amber -based ensemble refinement, quantum-mechanical representation of active sites and improved geometric restraints for simulated annealing.
Publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Date: 18-11-2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.11.18.517112
Abstract: Experimental structure determination can be accelerated with AI-based structure prediction methods such as AlphaFold. Here we present an automatic procedure requiring only sequence information and crystallographic data that uses AlphaFold predictions to produce an electron density map and a structural model. Iterating through cycles of structure prediction is a key element of our procedure: a predicted model rebuilt in one cycle is used as a template for prediction in the next cycle. We applied this procedure to X-ray data for 215 structures released by the Protein Data Bank in a recent 6-month period. In 87% of cases our procedure yielded a model with at least 50% of C α atoms matching those in the deposited models within 2Å. Predictions from our iterative template-guided prediction procedure were more accurate than those obtained without templates. We suggest a general strategy for macromolecular structure determination that includes AI-based prediction both as a starting point and as a method of model optimization.
No related grants have been discovered for Jane Richardson.