ORCID Profile
0000-0003-4663-1716
Current Organisation
Universität Bielefeld
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 2011
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 23-03-2018
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 12-2021
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 10-2023
Publisher: BMJ
Date: 07-12-2018
DOI: 10.1136/BMJ.K4602
Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Date: 18-11-2010
Publisher: BMJ
Date: 07-12-2018
DOI: 10.1136/BMJ.K4786
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 05-2020
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 11-2019
DOI: 10.1093/EURPUB/CKZ185.799
Abstract: This presentation will focus on three aspects related to the equity, social determinants and gender considerations relevant to AMR. The presentation will begin with a general description of how structural forces and socioeconomic inequities can result in specific population groups in society having differential exposure and vulnerability to AMR as well as suffering differential social, economic and other consequences and impacts from the associated ill health. Secondly, will be an explanation of the how the application of conceptual frameworks and approaches on equity, social determinants and gender on can shed valuable light on the specific pathways and mechanisms through which these patterns arise, and how these factors may influence the effectiveness of any initiatives and interventions aimed at tackling aspects of this global health challenge. The presentation will conclude by providing an overview of the emerging results from a scoping review on the gender, equity and social determinants considerations for tackling AMR and promising directions for inter-/trans-disciplinary research on this theme.
Publisher: Maad Rayan Publishing Company
Date: 12-2022
Abstract: While Australia's health system has reached universal health coverage (UHC), recent scholarship points to its strengths and identifies ways it could be more effective and equitable, especially for tackling non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Building on the Australian experience, we add to these perspectives and present pertinent lessons for the quest towards UHC, and for policy-makers globally with regard to NCDs. Potential lessons include: the need for (
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 02-2021
DOI: 10.1186/S12992-021-00664-W
Abstract: The success of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is predicated on multisectoral collaboration (MSC), and the COVID-19 pandemic makes it more urgent to learn how this can be done better. Complex challenges facing countries, such as COVID-19, cut across health, education, environment, financial and other sectors. Addressing these challenges requires the range of responsible sectors and intersecting services – across health, education, social and financial protection, economic development, law enforcement, among others – transform the way they work together towards shared goals. While the necessity of MSC is recognized, research is needed to understand how sectors collaborate, inform how to do so more efficiently, effectively and equitably, and ascertain similarities and differences across contexts. To answer these questions and inform practice, research to strengthen the evidence-base on MSC is critical. This paper draws on a 12-country study series on MSC for health and sustainable development, in the context of the health and rights of women, children and adolescents. It is written by core members of the research coordination and country teams. Issues were analyzed during the study period through ‘real-time’ discussions and structured reporting, as well as through literature reviews and retrospective feedback and analysis at the end of the study. We identify four considerations that are unique to MSC research which will be of interest to other researchers, in the context of COVID-19 and beyond: 1) use theoretical frameworks to frame research questions as relevant to all sectors and to facilitate theoretical generalizability and evolution 2) specifically incorporate sectoral analysis into MSC research methods 3) develop a core set of research questions, using mixed methods and contextual adaptations as needed, with agreement on criteria for research rigor and 4) identify shared indicators of success and failure across sectors to assess MSCs. In responding to COVID-19 it is evident that effective MSC is an urgent priority. It enables partners from erse sectors to effectively convene to do more together than alone. Our findings have practical relevance for achieving this objective and contribute to the growing literature on partnerships and collaboration. We must seize the opportunity here to identify remaining knowledge gaps on how erse sectors can work together efficiently and effectively in different settings to accelerate progress towards achieving shared goals.
Publisher: E.U. European Publishing
Date: 27-04-2023
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 09-2020
DOI: 10.1093/EURPUB/CKAA166.707
Abstract: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a considerable threat to modern medicine and global health. Inequity, gender and social determinants of health (SDH) have a significant impact on health and health services, including in relation to AMR. Despite this, there is a lack of systematic focus on these dimensions in AMR research, policy and practice. We aimed to scope and review the existing evidence related to the equity, gender and SDH considerations for AMR globally through a systematic, iterative approach. We conducted a scoping review by searching PubMed, Web of Science and CINAHL for empirical research on AMR in humans, with consideration of equity, gender or SDH, published in English between January 2000 and September 2019. In a two-stage process, we analysed full texts to extract information about explicit and then implicit references to equity, gender or SDH. The search yielded 4628 articles after removing 578 duplicates. 737 articles were analysed with explicit reference to equity, gender or SDH in title or abstract. Preliminary results show that 93.2% of these studies mentioned gender but mostly meaning biological sex (90.8%) rather than its social construct. Articles on equity (6.0%) and SDH (1.1%) reported on associations between AMR rates and income and non-income dimensions of inequality, health system issues and disadvantaged subpopulations within countries. Other articles in this category explored public and policy discourse or approaches for AMR (0.8%) and equity issues for AMR-related R& D (0.7%). These results combined with the PROGRESS-Plus acronym informed the subsequent analysis of the 4628 articles for implicit considerations of equity, gender and SDH. Despite casting a wide net, we found relatively little research explicitly considering equity, gender and SDH aspects of AMR especially at a systematic or structural level. This reflects an important gap in the current understanding of and efforts to tackle AMR. We conducted a scoping review on equity, gender and social determinants considerations of AMR that indicates limited research on these important aspects of the social and structural drivers of AMR. Further research on these aspects is essential to inform the design of effective policy and practice interventions that target vulnerable groups and address structural inequities.
No related grants have been discovered for Victoria Saint.