ORCID Profile
0000-0002-4376-8381
Current Organisations
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
,
Prakken d'Oliveira
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 23-09-2022
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 23-09-2022
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 23-09-2022
Publisher: Brill | Nijhoff
Date: 2017
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 23-09-2022
Publisher: Brill
Date: 24-09-2013
DOI: 10.1163/18781527-00402005
Abstract: In 2005, the Responsibility to Protect was adopted in the World Summit Outcome with the aim to enable an efficient response to humanitarian crises by making the Security Council “work better”. The swift reaction to the events in Libya sparked the hope that the new concept enabled the Security Council to function this smoothly in the future. The debates within the Council in relation to the NATO intervention demonstrate that the Responsibility to Protect was able to contribute to this success in certain, limited ways. At the same time, these debates were herald to the problems experienced in relation to the events in Syria. Through an analyses of the debates concerning Libya within the Council, debates in other UN bodies related to the new concept, State practice, and relevant documents, this article will outline the potential of the Responsibility to Protect to make the Council “work better”, as well as its limitations.
No related grants have been discovered for Lisa-Marie Komp.