ORCID Profile
0000-0003-1926-5458
Current Organisation
University of Oxford
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 21-08-2007
Abstract: Sensory stimuli under natural conditions often consist of a temporally irregular sequence of events, contrasting with the periodic sequences commonly used as stimuli in the laboratory. These experiments compared the responses of neurons in rat barrel cortex with trains of whisker movements with different frequencies each train possessed either a periodic or an irregular, "noisy" temporal structure. Periodic stimulus trains were composed of a sequence of 21 whisker deflections separated by 20 equal interdeflection intervals (IDIs). Noisy trains were matched for mean IDI but included intervals shorter and longer than the mean IDI. Cortical responses were equivalent for periodic and noisy stimuli for frequencies up to 10 Hz. Above 10 Hz, temporal noise led to a larger response magnitude, and this effect was lified as deflection frequency increased. Noise also caused a sharpening of the temporal precision of response to the in idual deflections of the stimulus train. Cortical neurons thus appear to be "tuned" to respond in a different way to stimuli characterized by temporal unpredictability. As a consequence, perceptual judgments that depend on somatosensory cortical firing rate may be affected by the presence of temporal noise.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2017
Publisher: Society for Neuroscience
Date: 18-02-2015
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3653-14.2015
Abstract: Economic choices are largely determined by two principal elements, reward value (utility) and probability. Although nonlinear utility functions have been acknowledged for centuries, nonlinear probability weighting (probability distortion) was only recently recognized as a ubiquitous aspect of real-world choice behavior. Even when outcome probabilities are known and acknowledged, human decision makers often overweight low probability outcomes and underweight high probability outcomes. Whereas recent studies measured utility functions and their corresponding neural correlates in monkeys, it is not known whether monkeys distort probability in a manner similar to humans. Therefore, we investigated economic choices in macaque monkeys for evidence of probability distortion. We trained two monkeys to predict reward from probabilistic gambles with constant outcome values (0.5 ml or nothing). The probability of winning was conveyed using explicit visual cues (sector stimuli). Choices between the gambles revealed that the monkeys used the explicit probability information to make meaningful decisions. Using these cues, we measured probability distortion from choices between the gambles and safe rewards. Parametric modeling of the choices revealed classic probability weighting functions with inverted-S shape. Therefore, the animals overweighted low probability rewards and underweighted high probability rewards. Empirical investigation of the behavior verified that the choices were best explained by a combination of nonlinear value and nonlinear probability distortion. Together, these results suggest that probability distortion may reflect evolutionarily preserved neuronal processing.
Publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Date: 06-05-2016
DOI: 10.1101/051912
Abstract: Research in neuroscience relies increasingly on the mouse, a mammalian species that affords unparalleled genetic tractability and brain atlases. Here we introduce high-yield methods for probing mouse visual decisions. Mice are head-fixed, which facilitates repeatable visual stimulation, eye tracking, and brain access. They turn a steering wheel to make two-alternative choices, forced or unforced. Learning is rapid thanks to intuitive coupling of stimuli to wheel position. The mouse decisions deliver high-quality psychometric curves for detection and discrimination, and conform to the predictions of a simple probabilistic observer model. The task is readily paired with two-photon imaging of cortical activity. Optogenetic inactivation reveals that the task requires the visual cortex. Mice are motivated to perform the task by fluid reward or optogenetic stimulation of dopaminergic neurons. This stimulation elicits larger number of trials and faster learning. These methods provide a platform to accurately probe mouse vision and its neural basis.
Publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Date: 12-04-2010
Abstract: We investigated connections between the physiology of rat barrel cortex neurons and the sensation of vibration in humans. One set of experiments measured neuronal responses in anesthetized rats to trains of whisker deflections, each train characterized either by constant litude across all deflections or by variable litude (“ litude noise”). Firing rate and firing synchrony were, on average, boosted by the presence of noise. However, neurons were not uniform in their responses to noise. Barrel cortex neurons have been categorized as regular-spiking units (putative excitatory neurons) and fast-spiking units (putative inhibitory neurons). Among regular-spiking units, litude noise caused a higher firing rate and increased cross-neuron synchrony. Among fast-spiking units, noise had the opposite effect: It led to a lower firing rate and decreased cross-neuron synchrony. This finding suggests that litude noise affects the interaction between inhibitory and excitatory neurons. From these physiological effects, we expected that noise would lead to an increase in the perceived intensity of a vibration. We tested this notion using psychophysical measurements in humans. As predicted, subjects overestimated the intensity of noisy vibrations. Thus the physiological mechanisms present in barrel cortex also appear to be at work in the human tactile system, where they affect vibration perception.
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
No related grants have been discovered for Armin Lak.