ORCID Profile
0000-0001-9704-8403
Current Organisation
Australian National University
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 08-2013
Publisher: Manchester University Press
Date: 26-10-2021
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 08-2019
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 29-08-2016
DOI: 10.1111/JZO.12381
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 04-07-2019
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 2016
DOI: 10.1111/ASPP.12241
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 08-2011
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 09-2008
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 04-06-2018
DOI: 10.1093/IRAP/LCY014
Abstract: Since 2012, Japan’s Prime Minister Abe Shinzō has sought to remake the country’s foreign and security policy. Abe’s agenda, which is increasingly called an ‘Abe Doctrine’, has prompted considerable debate as to its true nature. Is the Abe Doctrine nationalist, revisionist, or realist? This article contributes to these debates by tracing the competing characterizations of an Abe Doctrine’s policy ideas and assessing these against the doctrine’s policy prescriptions. It argues that the Abe Doctrine–situated within the long-term evolution of Japanese policymaking – is chiefly realist rather than nationalist in its policy prescriptions. In fact, where the doctrine does constitute a major departure from past policy practice, largely unrecognized until now, is not so much in how it expands Japan’s international role but in how it narrows this role. The underlying logic of the Abe Doctrine may therefore be pushing Japan towards a new form of regional realism.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 04-2012
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 06-2012
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Date: 2012
No related grants have been discovered for David Envall.