ORCID Profile
0000-0003-2170-3410
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 18-11-2010
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 05-2009
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 25-05-2011
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 2017
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 09-2007
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 2017
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 07-2013
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 07-2013
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2008
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.1701595
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 14-01-2009
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-10-2014
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 17-04-2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-04-2015
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-04-2015
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 08-2012
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 08-2012
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-2013
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 23-01-2019
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 05-2014
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 28-01-2019
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 25-05-2022
DOI: 10.1111/ANTI.12846
Abstract: This intervention responds to a series of articles—including one published in Antipode —on what is referred to as “new” state capitalism (NSC) or sometimes, simply, state capitalism. Our overarching argument is that by eliding state and institutionalist theory and, specifically, separating the analysis of state transformation from the power and leverage of social forces under late capitalism, NSC scholars end up offering an inaccurate, inchoate and incoherent conceptualisation and analysis of important phenomena. Our contention is that future work needs to return to socio‐relational analyses of the state, prioritising the power and leverage of social forces operating under patterns of accumulation characterised by more‐integrated‐than‐ever‐before global economic‐market relations and the concentration of productive and financial capital.
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2020
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Date: 2014
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2011
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.1959702
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 24-05-2017
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Date: 2014
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Date: 2014
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Date: 14-02-2022
DOI: 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780197527085.013.11
Abstract: This chapter details the mutually reinforcing relationship between globalization, neoliberalism, and late capitalism. The chapter emphasizes the dialectical and politically determined evolution of all three, explaining how intensifying patterns of competition have resulted in diminishing the power of progressive social forces and increasing the leverage of competitive fractions of capital and powerful capitalist states. Neoliberalism—often conveniently dismissed by liberals and conservatives alike as a nebulous concept—is explicitly defined as the application of market and market-like discipline to the reorganization of state and society. Forged out of a set ideas and reductionist assumptions emanating from orthodox economics, in its applied form neoliberalism comprises the evolving policy sets demanded by the most powerful (‘competitive’) fractions of capital and the states that represent their interests. In a structural sense, real-existing neoliberalism serves as the institutional ‘software’ of globalization, combining with the integrative techno-logistical infrastructure that makes the ongoing reorganization of production—‘globalization’—possible. Four decades of neoliberal reform and resultant globalization have produced what is often referred to as ‘late capitalism’. Late capitalism is characterized by hypercompetition between and within states, the heightened power of finance capital and grand contradiction—the latter including gross inequality and deprivation amid plenty, deindustrialization and the ‘death of development’, and systemic environmental decline. While resistance to neoliberalism is evident in many (sometimes reactionary) forms, the all-enveloping nature of late capitalism and the ongoing reinvention of neoliberalism as the ‘only’ solution to contradiction make the political task of reimagining and realizing alternative social orders formidable.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 11-2007
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Date: 2010
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 06-10-2017
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 22-05-2014
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Date: 2014
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Date: 2014
No related grants have been discovered for Toby James CARROLL.