ORCID Profile
0000-0003-2093-5738
Current Organisation
Monash University
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
In Research Link Australia (RLA), "Research Topics" refer to ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes. These topics are either sourced from ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes listed in researchers' related grants or generated by a large language model (LLM) based on their publications.
Australian Government And Politics | Sociology | Other Education | Social Change | Education not elsewhere classified | Race And Ethnic Relations
Ethnicity and multiculturalism | Civics and citizenship | Expanding Knowledge in Education | Religion and society | Education and Training not elsewhere classified |
Publisher: JSTOR
Date: 06-1974
DOI: 10.2307/1384385
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 13-05-2020
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 06-2012
Publisher: BRILL
Date: 2007
Publisher: James Nicholas Publishers
Date: 2007
DOI: 10.7459/PC/14.1.06
Publisher: JSTOR
Date: 09-1978
DOI: 10.2307/1386325
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 12-1972
DOI: 10.2307/2576341
Publisher: JSTOR
Date: 1975
DOI: 10.2307/3710205
Publisher: MDPI AG
Date: 18-02-2020
DOI: 10.3390/REL11020092
Abstract: This paper argues for a reconsideration of social cohesion as an analytical concept and a policy goal in response to increasing levels of religious ersity in contemporary Australia. In recent decades, Australian has seen a revitalization of religion, increasing numbers of those who do not identify with a religion (the “nones”), and the growth of religious minorities, including Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and Sikhism. These changes are often understood as problematic for social cohesion. In this paper, we review some conceptualizations of social cohesion and religious ersity in Australia, arguing that the concept of social cohesion, despite its initial promise, is ultimately problematic, particularly when it is used to defend privilege. We survey Australian policy responses to religious ersity, noting that these are varied, often piecemeal, and that the hyper erse state of Victoria generally has the most sophisticated set of public policies. We conclude with a call for more nuanced and contextualized analyses of religious ersity and social cohesion in Australia. Religious ersity presents both opportunities as well as challenges to social cohesion. Both these aspects need to be considered in the formation of policy responses.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 1996
DOI: 10.1007/BF03351195
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 2010
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Date: 02-09-2009
Publisher: Routledge
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 03-1971
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 16-11-2006
Abstract: Australian Soul challenges the idea that religious and spiritual life in Australia is in decline. This fascinating book describes the character of religious and spiritual life in Australia today, and argues that, far from petering out, religion and spirituality are thriving. Gary Bouma, the leading expert on the state of religious life in Australia, provides the most up-to-date facts and figures and compares the 'tone' of Australian religious practices with those of other countries. Australians might be less vocal and more reticent about their religion than Americans are, but their religious and spiritual beliefs are no less potent. Australian Soul describes and analyses our religious and spiritual life in detail as well as providing a series of case studies that illustrate the range of practices and beliefs in Australia today. Australian Soul predicts a vital future for religion and spirituality.
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publisher: JSTOR
Date: 12-1981
DOI: 10.2307/3511929
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 04-2003
Publisher: JSTOR
Date: 1979
DOI: 10.2307/3509971
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 08-2000
DOI: 10.1080/713678941
Publisher: JSTOR
Date: 06-1973
DOI: 10.2307/1384886
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 19-09-2007
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Date: 1979
DOI: 10.1086/226889
Publisher: Equinox Publishing
Date: 15-10-2012
Publisher: MDPI AG
Date: 03-04-2020
DOI: 10.3390/REL11040166
Abstract: Recent scholarly and media perspectives on religion and youth have often depicted young people as being apathetic when it comes to religion. The methods used in research on religion are also typically informed by outdated, fixed idea of religious identity that are no longer applicable, especially to young people. This paper confronts these issues by applying contemporary theories of religious ersity, including lived religion and religious complexity, to the findings of the Canadian Religion, Gender and Sexuality among Youth in Canada (RGSY) study, the Australian Interaction multifaith youth movement project, and the Worldviews of Australian Generation Z (AGZ) study. These three studies revealed that young people negotiate their worldview identities in complex, critical and caring ways that are far from ambivalent, and that are characterised by hybridity and questioning. We thereby recommend that policies and curricula pertaining to young people’s and societies’ wellbeing better reflect young people’s actual lived experiences of ersity.
Publisher: Equinox Publishing
Date: 16-03-2008
Publisher: BRILL
Date: 2015
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 03-2011
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
Date: 31-08-2010
Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Date: 1975
Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Date: 1994
Publisher: JSTOR
Date: 12-1995
DOI: 10.2307/3512397
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 12-05-2022
DOI: 10.1177/14407833211011256
Abstract: Melbourne’s religious ersity is increasing. This article reveals distinctive new configurations of ethno-religious ersity arising from immigration and residential mobility at a fine spatial level in different parts of one of the world’s most cosmopolitan cities – Melbourne. Using the lens of super- ersity, we see beyond multicultural groups to intersections of ersities, and identify new types of ethno-religious compound in neighbourhoods that were once defined by religious patterns of solidarity. We can no longer use religious labels to describe these evolving groups because they are not defined by any dominant religion instead, we describe them in terms reflecting their other increasingly salient characteristics. At the local level in Melbourne, it is now necessary to refer to the existence not only of religious ersity but of a ‘ ersity of ersities’ in patterns of religious identification.
Publisher: JSTOR
Date: 06-1980
DOI: 10.2307/1386257
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 1995
DOI: 10.2307/3711824
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 08-05-2017
Publisher: JSTOR
Date: 1973
DOI: 10.2307/3510301
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
Date: 31-08-2010
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 05-03-2020
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Date: 15-10-2013
Publisher: JSTOR
Date: 09-1993
DOI: 10.2307/3511075
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 1970
DOI: 10.2307/3710086
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 1988
DOI: 10.2307/3710881
Publisher: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Date: 2012
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 16-11-2006
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 16-11-2006
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 16-11-2006
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 16-11-2006
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 16-11-2006
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 1980
DOI: 10.2307/3710402
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 16-11-2006
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 16-11-2006
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 1977
DOI: 10.2307/3710125
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 09-2012
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 16-11-2006
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 10-2011
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 16-11-2006
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan US
Date: 2015
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 09-07-2016
Abstract: Religious ersity and social cohesion have long been seen to be at odds with each other. Classical sociology, grounded in the Westphalian solution to religious conflict in Europe presumed that a single religion was necessary for social cohesion. The issue of religious ersity and social cohesion has come to the fore as once religiously monochrome societies have become erse through migration and, to a lesser degree, conversion. While European nations question the possibility of multicultural and multi-faith societies living in productive harmony, Australia offers an ex le of a successful multicultural and multi-faith society. Australia has produced a multicultural society through a policy of social inclusion and mutual respect, in contrast to European policies which produce separate community development. This cross-national comparative study reveals demographic and socio-cultural differences that are likely to explain some of the comparative success of Australia in producing social inclusion and avoiding the ‘othering’ of religious minorities, especially of Muslims. Australia has a particular demographic that features multiple substantial minority religious communities living in ways that promote daily encounters among people of different backgrounds.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 03-2004
Abstract: The study of the management of religious ersity has largely proceeded non-comparatively at national and organizational levels. As a result it is not yet possible to declare what promotes and what hinders the emergence of harmonious inter-religious relations in religiously erse societies. This article compares the management of religious ersity at an urban level through a comparison of Melbourne, Australia and Hong Kong. The article first describes the demographic history of these two cities and then explores their social institutions of religion and organizations promoting inter-religious harmony in order to find explanations for the postwar emergence of societies characterized by both religious ersity and inter-religious harmony. Finally, it reflects on the policy implications of these findings.
Publisher: Springer US
Date: 2004
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 06-1998
Publisher: Equinox Publishing
Date: 30-08-2016
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 1985
DOI: 10.2307/3711162
Publisher: Equinox Publishing
Date: 16-12-2013
Publisher: JSTOR
Date: 03-1986
DOI: 10.2307/1386076
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 03-2003
Publisher: JSTOR
Date: 06-1996
DOI: 10.2307/3512023
Publisher: Equinox Publishing
Date: 03-11-2014
DOI: 10.1558/JASR.V27I1.3
Publisher: JSTOR
Date: 10-1978
DOI: 10.2307/1965768
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 09-12-2019
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: JSTOR
Date: 09-1988
DOI: 10.2307/1387392
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 30-04-2014
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 2010
Publisher: Cogitatio
Date: 19-04-2016
DOI: 10.17645/SI.V4I2.631
Abstract: As societies have become religiously erse in ways and extents not familiar in the recent histories of most, the issues of how to include this ersity and how to manage it, that is, questions about how to be a religiously erse society have come to the fore. As a result religion has become part of the social policy conversation in new ways. It has also occasioned new thinking about religions, their forms and the complexity of ways they are negotiated by adherents and the ways they are related to society, the state and each other. This issue of em Social Inclusion /em explores these issues of social inclusion in both particular settings and in cross-national comparative studies by presenting research and critical thought on this critical issue facing every society today.
Publisher: JSTOR
Date: 09-1995
DOI: 10.2307/3512078
Publisher: JSTOR
Date: 12-1986
DOI: 10.2307/1385924
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 03-2008
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 16-11-2006
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 16-11-2006
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 16-11-2006
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 12-1998
DOI: 10.1177/144078339803400302
Abstract: There has been a renewed interest in social institutions and social change. However, most discussions of social change use the terms 'institutions' and 'organisations' almost interchangeably, while a few make a distinction which is then ignored, obscured or lost. Institutions are sets of norms which apply across a variety of specific organisations. Organisations are structures of social relationship, social actors arranged in positions and roles usually, but not always, deliberately arranged and designed to achieve some end. Institutions provide normative environments shaping the activities of organisations. Distinguishing institutions and organisations facilitates discussion of the relationship between them, examining the different contribution each makes in social change and making cross-national comparisons. Using ex les from the institutions of religion, education and patriarchy the relationship between institutions and organisations in social change is explored.
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 1974
DOI: 10.2307/3710657
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 1993
DOI: 10.2307/3712150
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 03-1980
DOI: 10.1007/BF01760286
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Date: 24-11-2009
Start Date: 07-2006
End Date: 04-2010
Amount: $109,049.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 08-2016
End Date: 12-2020
Amount: $460,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded Activity