ORCID Profile
0000-0002-4221-2760
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
In Research Link Australia (RLA), "Research Topics" refer to ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes. These topics are either sourced from ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes listed in researchers' related grants or generated by a large language model (LLM) based on their publications.
Housing Markets, Development, Management | Urban and Regional Studies (excl. Planning) | Human Geography |
Expanding Knowledge in Built Environment and Design | Employment Patterns and Change
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 17-01-2023
Abstract: This article addresses the process and patterns by which private property has been applied on the Australian continent. Alongside both lease‐holdings that are limited by term or perpetual and squatting practices, identifying and documenting private property in both in idual cases and in aggregate over a large geography offers a compelling approximation of the appearance and spread of British–Australian settlement. Plots and patterns of private land ownership can be read in relation to other forms of land use and tenure each subject to specific historical legal instruments and definitions. We explore how, in particular, the first‐generation alienation of private property might be constructed, represented, and theorised using a critical approach to GIS tools and practices. What technical considerations are required to identify the extent of a site and map its transfer into private hands? How far can the process of mapping the initial alienation of parcels of Crown land over time expose legacies of colonial practices in present‐day methods and serve as a testbed to generate other layers that capture, for instance, patterns of informal privatisation or interact with other phenomena—most notably that of frontier violence—that likewise occur on land, in time? Such work can be located among those wrestling with problems of mapping colonial land occupation with technologies that share a heritage with the surveying tools that allowed that same acquisition and can enhance a critical approach to GIS in relation to appropriation and dispossession of Aboriginal land.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-04-2017
Publisher: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI)
Date: 29-05-2018
Publisher: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI)
Date: 11-10-2017
Publisher: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI)
Date: 28-05-2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 28-05-2018
Publisher: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
Date: 06-2021
DOI: 10.13060/23362839.2021.8.1.528
Abstract: The popularity of short-term letting (STL) platforms like Airbnb has created housing and planning challenges for cities worldwide, including the potential impact of STL on the quality of life of nearby residents and communities. Underpinning this concern is an inherent tension in urban living between the rights and interests of in idual residents and the collective rights and interests of neighbours. Through interviews with Australian Airbnb hosts, this paper examines how STL hosts navigate this tension, including how they frame their rights, how they seek to minimise impacts on neighbours, and how they perceive the role of regulation in balancing in idual and community rights. In doing so, the paper contributes to both theory and policy debates about urban property rights and how ‘compact city’ planning orthodoxies are reshaping the lived experience of urban residents worldwide.
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 05-05-2016
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 09-06-2021
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-10-2020
Publisher: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI)
Date: 08-11-2018
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 2014
DOI: 10.1068/A140008G
Publisher: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI)
Date: 15-11-2018
Publisher: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI)
Date: 14-02-2018
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 03-07-2014
Publisher: Cogitatio
Date: 19-09-2022
Abstract: In Australia, as in many other countries, private high-density housing is typically marketed as the domain of middle- and higher-income residents. But, in practice, it accommodates many lower-income households. These households often live in mixed-income communities alongside wealthier neighbours, but, because of constrained budgets, they rely more heavily on access to community services and facilities. This has implications for public infrastructure planning in high-density neighbourhoods where private property ownership dominates. In this article, we examine two neighbourhood case studies within the same local government area in Sydney that have sizable populations of lower-income households living in apartments, but which provide markedly different day-to-day experiences for residents. We consider the causes of these varying outcomes and implications for neighbourhood-scale planning and development. The article argues that coordinated and collaborative planning processes are key to ensuring that the needs of lower-income households are met in privately developed apartment neighbourhoods.
Publisher: Australian Cities Research Network
Date: 2018
Publisher: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI)
Date: 03-2023
Publisher: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI)
Date: 09-2023
Publisher: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI)
Date: 06-2019
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 08-01-2018
Publisher: Australian Cities Research Network
Date: 2018
Publisher: Alexandrine Press
Date: 04-2023
DOI: 10.2148/BENV.49.1.39
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2020
Publisher: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI)
Date: 05-05-2022
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 14-06-2018
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 17-07-2018
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 15-03-2018
Abstract: Australia has long had a deeply speculative housing property market. Arguably this has been accentuated in recent years as successive governments have privileged private-sector investment in housing property as the key mechanism for delivering housing and a concurrent winding back of direct government support for housing. This has occurred through a period in which urban renewal and flexible planning regulation have become the key focus of urban planning policy to deliver on compact city ambitions in the name of sustainability. There has been a tendency to read many of the higher density housing outcomes as a relatively homogenous component of the housing market. There has been a comparative lack of critical engagement with differentiated spatial, physical and socio-economic outcomes within the higher density housing market. This paper will explore the interactions between flexible design-based planning policies, the local property market and physical outcomes. Different parts of the property development industry produced distinctive social and physical outcomes within the same regulatory space. Each response was infused with similar politics of exclusion and privilege in which capacity to pay regulated both access and standard of housing accessible, opening new socio-economic isions within Australia’s housing landscape.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-05-2022
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 13-08-2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 18-04-2017
Start Date: 07-2021
End Date: 06-2025
Amount: $348,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2019
End Date: 07-2024
Amount: $328,021.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded Activity