ORCID Profile
0000-0002-5295-0126
Current Organisations
Maastricht University
,
University of Technology Sydney
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 03-07-2018
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
Date: 29-06-2012
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 03-2018
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 08-2023
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 2023
DOI: 10.1177/26317877231153185
Abstract: Shame has been identified as a debilitating emotion that impedes entrepreneurial action. Yet, there are many ex les of people who experience shame and go on to create entrepreneurial ventures. How then is entrepreneurship possible in the face of such shame? To address this question, we develop a theoretical process model that highlights the connection between in idual and collective experiences of shame and elaborates when and how such experiences may lead to entrepreneurship. We suggest that third-person experiences of shame can transform first-person experiences and trigger identification with a community of similarly stigmatized others. We argue that the distinct narratives provided by these communities can reduce or enhance entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and therefore lead to different entrepreneurial pathways: some in iduals may create ventures out of necessity, while others will create ventures that act as shame-free havens for themselves and others, and become a source of emancipation and social change. By outlining distinct entrepreneurial pathways out of shame, we extend current research at the intersection of entrepreneurship, necessity, emancipation, and social change.
Publisher: Emerald
Date: 08-05-2018
Abstract: This paper aims to explore the emergence and nature of impact investment in Australia and how it is shaping the development of the social enterprise sector. Impact investment is an emerging approach to financing social enterprises that aims to achieve blended value by delivering both impact and financial returns. In seeking to deliver blended value, impact investment combines potentially conflicted logics from investment, philanthropy and government spending. This paper utilizes institutional theory as a lens to understand the nature of these competing logics in impact investment. The paper adopts a sequential exploratory mixed methods approach to study the emergence of impact investment in Australia. The mixed methods include 18 qualitative interviews with impact investors in the Australian market and a subsequent online questionnaire on characteristics of impact investment products, activity and performance. The findings provide empirical evidence of the rapid growth in impact investment in Australia. The analysis reveals the nature of institutional complexity in impact investment and highlights the risk that the impact logic may become overshadowed by the investment logic if the difference in rigor around financial performance measurement and impact performance measurement is maintained. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for the development of the Australian social enterprise sector. This paper provides empirical evidence on the emergence of impact investment in Australia and contributes to a growing global body of evidence about the nature, size and characteristics of impact investment.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 24-10-2019
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 08-2018
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 03-07-2018
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 24-02-2021
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
Date: 2022
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 08-2022
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
Date: 26-07-2019
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 26-08-2023
DOI: 10.1177/00076503221120568
Abstract: This article examines how organizational experience influences social enterprise responses to impact assessment practices. Limited attention has been paid to why organizations resist or challenge impact assessment practices or how prior experience with impact assessment may shape organizational responses. The study draws on interviews with practitioners involved in social enterprise–impact investor dyads in Australia and the United Kingdom. The findings reveal that social enterprises enact either combative or collaborative responses in their relationships with impact investors based on past experiences with impact assessment. The study shows how more experienced social enterprises reach a state of impact lock-in—where they become committed to particular approaches to understanding, measuring, and reporting impact. The article contributes to the literature on impact assessment and impact investment by showing how organizational experience shapes ergent reactions to the demands imposed by impact investors, creating complementary forces of institutionalization and contestation of impact assessment practice.
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 08-2018
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 25-03-2023
DOI: 10.1007/S10551-023-05363-7
Abstract: Our paper explores the complex place-based relations of cross-sector partnerships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous partners. We draw on a longitudinal in-depth case study of the Bundian Way, an Indigenous-led cross-sector partnership of over 40 organisations. Through practices of listening to history and walking ‘on Country’, the non-Indigenous partners and our team came to appreciate the in isibility of place and time and bear witness to the intergenerational trauma of colonially imposed isions. By combining a 45-day place-based ethnography with a 36-month participant observation and repeated interviews with the Advisory Committee members, we explain how non-Indigenous members of the cross-sector partnership came to realise, and reverse, these place-time isions. We contribute to an ethics of custodianship by first contrasting, and then combining, Indigenous and Western ways of knowing place through time.
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 08-2017
Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited
Date: 27-09-2018
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 12-2022
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 17-06-2015
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 08-2023
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 08-2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 09-2012
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 10-2011
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 29-04-2019
DOI: 10.1111/BEER.12230
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 17-11-2022
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 08-2018
Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited
Date: 27-09-2018
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 08-2017
Publisher: Academy of Management
Date: 08-2020
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 27-01-2020
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 02-2022
No related grants have been discovered for Jarrod Ormiston.