ORCID Profile
0000-0002-1091-0943
Current Organisation
Monash University
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 12-03-2019
DOI: 10.1002/JCPY.1100
Publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Date: 18-01-2022
Abstract: Political polarization impeded public support for policies to address the spread of COVID-19, much as polarization hinders responses to other societal challenges. The present cross-country study demonstrates how the cues from political elites and affective polarization are analogous across countries addressing COVID-19. Far from being an outlier, the United States faces polarization challenges similar to those of other countries. Importantly, the results demonstrate that policies to combat public health crises are more supported when proposed by nonpartisan experts and bipartisan coalitions of political leaders. These results provide clear guidance on depolarizing communication strategies to improve global responses to health crises.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 05-07-2022
DOI: 10.1111/JOCA.12462
Abstract: Sharenting (using social media to share content about one's child) is a progressively common phenomenon enabled by society's increased connection to digital technology. Although it can encourage positive connections to others, it also creates concerns related to children's privacy and well‐being. In this paper, we establish boundaries and terminology related to sharenting in an evolving digital world. We conceptualize a modern sharenting ecosystem involving key stakeholders (parents, children, community, commercial institutions, and policymakers), by applying consumer vulnerability theory to explore the increased online connection that occurs as work, school, and socialization become increasingly more virtual. Next, we expand the characterization of sharenting by introducing a spectrum of sharenting awareness that categorizes three types of sharenting (active, passive, and invisible). Finally, we provide a research agenda for policymakers and consumer welfare researchers.
Publisher: FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Date: 03-2008
DOI: 10.1590/S1984-92302008000100002
Abstract: O mercado de consumo é caracterizado por mudanças expressivas, principalmente no que diz respeito ao atendimento mais in idualizado, preocupação expressada por esforços em desenvolver novas bases de segmentação para aumentar a eficácia das ações de marketing. Uma base de segmentação ainda pouco utilizada é a por coortes, a qual busca identificar grupos que passaram pelos mesmos eventos externos na passagem para a maioridade. Apesar do forte fator demográfico (idade), a segmentação por coortes é do tipo psicográfica já que visa à identificação de valores. O objetivo deste artigo é explorar o conceito de coorte como forma de segmentação de mercado em marketing e sua aplicação nas decisões de marketing. O método empregado neste ensaio é o levantamento bibliográfico de caráter descritivo e analítico. Conclui-se que o método ainda é pouco utilizado, mas que pode gerar contribuições importantes em marketing se os esforços necessários para sua aplicação forem empreendidos.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 16-12-2021
DOI: 10.1002/MAR.21629
Abstract: In two experimental studies, we tested the effect of COVID‐19 vaccine scarcity on vaccine hesitancy. Based on extensive scarcity literature, we initially predicted that high (vs. low) scarcity would increase demand for vaccines, operationalized as one's willingness to receive a vaccine. Contrary to this prediction, Study 1 showed that scarcity of vaccines reduced participants’ sense of priority which, in turn, also reduced their vaccination intentions. Trust in doctors moderated the effect of perceived vaccination priority on vaccination intentions such that for in iduals with high trust in doctors, reduced perceived priority did not reduce their vaccination intentions as much. Study 2 replicated these effects with a more general population s le, which included at‐risk in iduals for COVID‐19 complications. At‐risk participants (vs. low‐risk) had higher perceived vaccination priority, but describing vaccine doses as scarce reduced vaccination intentions similarly across both groups. Moreover, Study 2 demonstrated that compassion for others is a boundary condition of the effect of vaccine scarcity on vaccination intentions. For participants with high compassion, scarcity reduces willingness to receive a vaccine for participants with low compassion, scarcity increases their willingness to be vaccinated. Our results suggest that health policymakers need to deemphasize the scarcity of vaccines to increase vaccine acceptance.
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Date: 2022
DOI: 10.1086/711837
Publisher: Center for Open Science
Date: 18-07-2023
Abstract: This pre-registered work tests the replicability of seven studies covering the most important effects associated with mental accounting across 5,589 participants from 21 countries. Findings support the robustness of the original studies across time and culture, confirming the role of mental accounting as a critical driver of human decision-making.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 27-12-2013
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 03-10-2022
DOI: 10.1093/PNASNEXUS/PGAC218
Abstract: People believe they should consider how their behavior might negatively impact other people, Yet their behavior often increases others’ health risks. This creates challenges for managing public health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined a procedure wherein people reflect on their personal criteria regarding how their behavior impacts others’ health risks. We expected structured reflection to increase people's intentions and decisions to reduce others’ health risks. Structured reflection increases attention to others’ health risks and the correspondence between people's personal criteria and behavioral intentions. In four experiments during COVID-19, people (N = 12,995) reported their personal criteria about how much specific attributes, including the impact on others’ health risks, should influence their behavior. Compared with control conditions, people who engaged in structured reflection reported greater intentions to reduce business capacity (experiment 1) and avoid large social gatherings (experiments 2 and 3). They also donated more to provide vaccines to refugees (experiment 4). These effects emerged across seven countries that varied in collectivism and COVID-19 case rates (experiments 1 and 2). Structured reflection was distinct from instructions to carefully deliberate (experiment 3). Structured reflection increased the correlation between personal criteria and behavioral intentions (experiments 1 and 3). And structured reflection increased donations more among people who scored lower in cognitive reflection compared with those who scored higher in cognitive reflection (experiment 4). These findings suggest that structured reflection can effectively increase behaviors to reduce public health risks.
Publisher: Universidade de Sao Paulo, Agencia USP de Gestao da Informacao Academica (AGUIA)
No related grants have been discovered for Beatriz Pereira.