ORCID Profile
0000-0001-7024-2978
Current Organisation
King Abdullah Medical City
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 13-07-2022
DOI: 10.1186/S12910-022-00808-6
Abstract: In Saudi clinical settings, benevolent family care that reflects strongly held sociocultural values is commonly used to justify overriding respect for patient autonomy. Because the welfare of in iduals is commonly regarded as inseparable from the welfare of their family as a whole, these values are widely believed to obligate the family to protect the welfare of its members by, for ex le, giving the family authority over what healthcare practitioners disclose to patients about their diagnoses and prognoses and preventing them from making informed decisions about their healthcare. Family dominance over the healthcare decisions of competent patients is ethically problematic when the family prevent healthcare practitioners from disclosing diagnoses and prognoses to patients who have the capacity to consent and make decisions in their own best interests. Thus, the author holds that sociocultural values ought to be respected only when they do not prevent competent patients from knowing their diagnoses and prognoses or prevent them from making their own decisions. Healthcare practitioners should not allow patients’ families to control what can or cannot be disclosed to competent patients. This is particularly important when patients are approaching death so that they may address their material and spiritual wishes—among other needs—as they prepare for death. Justification for this position is drawn from the Maqasid Al-Shariah- based Islamic bioethics approach, from which it is possible to argue that the harm of withholding diagnoses and prognoses from patients who are imminently dying outweighs the potential benefits.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 06-12-2022
DOI: 10.1186/S12910-022-00868-8
Abstract: In Saudi clinical settings, cultural influences can give a patient’s family authority to override the patient’s autonomous right to make informed health-related decisions. Cultural values should not prevent patients from exercising their genuine preferences when making medical decisions in their own best interests. This article discusses the moral implications of family-centred medical decisions for autonomous patients who are competent and capable of making decisions. The author argues that socio-cultural values do not justify the decision to override patient autonomy when patients express a preference for making their own choices. The author recommends the use of a model of shared decision-making that accounts for both in idual and relational conceptions of autonomy, approaching patients’ preferences in all medical encounters with the aim of minimising the potential for socio-cultural values to undermine patient autonomy. Although this approach is a safeguard against both family and medical paternalism, allowance is made for clinicians to act in weakly paternalistic ways when patients at high risk of exacerbating existing medical conditions are likely to benefit from delaying or limiting the disclosure of potentially distressing but non-fatal diagnoses and prognoses. Thus, the author argues that even in a culture that supports family involvement in management decisions, physicians should respect patient autonomy by asking patients for their preferences in the disclosure of their medical diagnoses, prognoses and management options and verifying patients’ preferences about the roles they wish their families to play (if any) in health-related decisions.
No related grants have been discovered for Manal Alfahmi.