ORCID Profile
0000-0002-5487-7284
Current Organisations
Charles Sturt University
,
University of Sydney
,
The Alan Turing Institute
,
AI and Cyber Futures Institute, Charles Sturt University
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 04-2015
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 04-2013
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2019
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 29-06-2008
Publisher: MDPI AG
Date: 02-09-2020
DOI: 10.3390/S20174967
Abstract: COVID-19 has shown a relatively low case fatality rate in young healthy in iduals, with the majority of this group being asymptomatic or having mild symptoms. However, the severity of the disease among the elderly as well as in in iduals with underlying health conditions has caused significant mortality rates worldwide. Understanding this variance amongst different sectors of society and modelling this will enable the different levels of risk to be determined to enable strategies to be applied to different groups. Long-established compartmental epidemiological models like SIR and SEIR do not account for the variability encountered in the severity of the SARS-CoV-2 disease across different population groups. The objective of this study is to investigate how a reduction in the exposure of vulnerable in iduals to COVID-19 can minimise the number of deaths caused by the disease, using the UK as a case study. To overcome the limitation of long-established compartmental epidemiological models, it is proposed that a modified model, namely SEIR-v, through which the population is separated into two groups regarding their vulnerability to SARS-CoV-2 is applied. This enables the analysis of the spread of the epidemic when different contention measures are applied to different groups in society regarding their vulnerability to the disease. A Monte Carlo simulation (100,000 runs) along the proposed SEIR-v model is used to study the number of deaths which could be avoided as a function of the decrease in the exposure of vulnerable in iduals to the disease. The results indicate a large number of deaths could be avoided by a slight realistic decrease in the exposure of vulnerable groups to the disease. The mean values across the simulations indicate 3681 and 7460 lives could be saved when such exposure is reduced by 10% and 20% respectively. From the encouraging results of the modelling a number of mechanisms are proposed to limit the exposure of vulnerable in iduals to the disease. One option could be the provision of a wristband to vulnerable people and those without a smartphone and contact-tracing app, filling the gap created by systems relying on smartphone apps only. By combining very dense contact tracing data from smartphone apps and wristband signals with information about infection status and symptoms, vulnerable people can be protected and kept safer.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 02-2023
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 12-10-2022
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 09-2016
Publisher: Institution of Engineering and Technology
Date: 2014
DOI: 10.1049/IC.2014.0050
Publisher: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
Date: 2017
Abstract: The “preference reversal phenomenon,” a systematic disparity between people’s valuations and choices, poses challenges for theory and policy. Using a very general formulation of probabilistic preferences, we show that the phenomenon is not mainly due to intransitive choice. We find a high degree of regularity within choice tasks and also within valuation tasks, but the two types of tasks appear to evoke very different cognitive processes, even when the experimental environment tries to minimise differences. We discuss possible implications for modelling and eliciting preferences. Data, as supplemental material, are available at 0.1287/mnsc.2015.2333 . This paper was accepted by Manel Baucells, decision analysis.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2009
Publisher: Springer Nature Switzerland
Date: 2022
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 20-04-2018
Publisher: The Royal Society
Date: 10-2017
DOI: 10.1098/RSOS.171172
Abstract: Universities and higher education institutions form an integral part of the national infrastructure and prestige. As academic research benefits increasingly from international exchange and cooperation, many universities have increased investment in improving and enabling their global connectivity. Yet, the relationship of university performance and its global physical connectedness has not been explored in detail. We conduct, to our knowledge, the first large-scale data-driven analysis into whether there is a correlation between university relative ranking performance and its global connectivity via the air transport network. The results show that local access to global hubs (as measured by air transport network betweenness ) strongly and positively correlates with the ranking growth (statistical significance in different models ranges between 5% and 1% level). We also found that the local airport’s aggregate flight paths ( degree ) and capacity ( weighted degree ) has no effect on university ranking, further showing that global connectivity distance is more important than the capacity of flight connections. We also examined the effect of local city economic development as a confounding variable and no effect was observed suggesting that access to global transportation hubs outweighs economic performance as a determinant of university ranking. The impact of this research is that we have determined the importance of the centrality of global connectivity and, hence, established initial evidence for further exploring potential connections between university ranking and regional investment policies on improving global connectivity.
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 24-05-2019
DOI: 10.1093/EJ/UEZ006
Abstract: We study contestability in charity markets where non-commercial, not-for-profit providers supply a homogeneous collective good through increasing-returns-to-scale technologies. Unlike in the case of for-profit competition, the absence of price-based sales contracts for charities means that fixed costs can translate into entry barriers, protecting the position of an inefficient incumbent or, conversely, they can make it possible for inefficient newcomers to contest the position of a more efficient incumbent. Evidence from laboratory experiments show that fixed-cost driven tradeoffs between efficiency and perceived risk can lead to inefficient technology adoption.
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 05-2017
DOI: 10.1111/ECOJ.12486
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2015
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 05-2014
DOI: 10.1111/ECOJ.12143
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 28-09-2010
DOI: 10.1002/JAE.1116
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Date: 09-07-2020
DOI: 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190067397.013.5
Abstract: This chapter argues that international human rights standards offer the most promising basis for developing a coherent and universally recognized set of standards that can be applied to meet any of the normative concerns currently falling under the rubric of AI (artificial intelligence) ethics. It then outlines the core elements of a human rights–centered design, deliberation, and oversight approach to the governance of AI. This approach requires that human rights norms are systemically considered at every stage of system design, development, and deployment, drawing upon and adapting technical methods and techniques for safe software and system design, verification, testing, and auditing in order to ensure compliance with human rights norms. The regime must be mandated by law and relies critically on external oversight by independent, competent, and properly resourced regulatory authorities with appropriate powers of investigation and enforcement. However, this approach will not ensure the protection of all ethical values adversely implicated by AI, given that human rights norms do not comprehensively cover all values of societal concern. As such, a great deal more work needs to be done to develop techniques and methodologies that are robust—reliable yet practically implementable across a wide and erse range of organizations involved in developing, building, and operating AI systems.
Publisher: Mark Allen Group
Date: 02-2019
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Date: 05-2018
DOI: 10.1017/S193029750000766X
Abstract: The transitivity axiom is common to nearly all descriptive and normative utility theories of choice under risk. Contrary to both intuition and common assumption, the little-known ’Steinhaus-Trybula paradox’ shows the relation ’stochastically greater than’ will not always be transitive, in contradiction of Weak Stochastic Transitivity. We bespoke-design pairs of lotteries inspired by the paradox, over which in idual preferences might cycle. We run an experiment to look for evidence of cycles, and violations of expansion/contraction consistency between choice sets. Even after considering possible stochastic but transitive explanations, we show that cycles can be the modal preference pattern over these simple lotteries, and we find systematic violations of expansion/contraction consistency.
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 07-2016
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-03-2020
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 03-2018
DOI: 10.1016/J.JHEALECO.2017.12.006
Abstract: Using ultrasound scan data from paediatric hospitals, and the exogenous 'shock' of learning the gender of an unborn baby, the paper documents the first causal evidence that offspring gender affects adult risk-aversion. On a standard Holt-Laury criterion, parents of daughters, whether unborn or recently born, become almost twice as risk-averse as parents of sons. The study demonstrates this in longitudinal and cross-sectional data, for fathers and mothers, for babies in the womb and new-born children, and in a West European nation and East European nation. These findings may eventually aid our understanding of risky health behaviors and gender inequalities.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 20-05-2010
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 13-04-2011
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 05-03-2009
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 08-2020
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 23-04-2009
Publisher: ACM
Date: 10-07-2023
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 10-2019
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 04-10-2019
DOI: 10.1111/REGO.12281
Abstract: This article develops a new framework linking cross‐cultural human values, regulation, and governance in the area of cybersecurity. Cyber space is currently transitioning from a laissez‐faire into a regulated area. Yet, there is a significant heterogeneity in terms of the strength of commitment in different states to regulation and governance of digital spaces. Therefore, it is important to explore why this heterogeneity exists. This article proposes that heterogeneity in the commitment to regulation and governance of cyber space between different nations stems from the fundamental cross‐cultural differences in human values between countries. Using an ex le of cybersecurity, we show how the cultural value orientations theory maps onto national commitments to regulate and govern cybersecurity issues. We construct a theoretical framework linking human values with cybersecurity regulation and confirm the existence of this link empirically using the data from the international Schwartz Value Survey and the Global Cybersecurity Index.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 12-2014
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 02-2008
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Location: Australia
Start Date: 2016
End Date: 2019
Funder: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2018
End Date: 2021
Funder: Economic and Social Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2017
End Date: 2020
Funder: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2018
End Date: 2021
Funder: Economic and Social Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2014
End Date: 2016
Funder: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2019
End Date: 2024
Funder: Economic and Social Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2017
End Date: 2017
Funder: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
View Funded Activity