ORCID Profile
0000-0002-4541-6419
Current Organisation
King's College London
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2020
DOI: 10.1016/J.JPAIN.2019.12.010
Abstract: Slow deep breathing (SDB) is commonly employed in the management of pain, but the underlying mechanisms remain equivocal. This study sought to investigate effects of instructed breathing patterns on experimental heat pain and to explore possible mechanisms of action. In a within-subject experimental design, healthy volunteers (n = 48) performed 4 breathing patterns: 1) unpaced breathing, 2) paced breathing (PB) at the participant's spontaneous breathing frequency, 3) SDB at 6 breaths per minute with a high inspiration/expiration ratio (SDB-H), and 4) SDB at 6 breaths per minute with a low inspiration/expiration ratio (SDB-L). During presentation of each breathing pattern, participants received painful heat stimuli of 3 different temperatures and rated each stimulus on pain intensity. Respiration, heart rate, and blood pressure were recorded. Compared to unpaced breathing, participants reported less intense pain during each of the 3 instructed breathing patterns. Among the instructed breathing patterns, pain did not differ between PB and SDB-H, and SDB-L attenuated pain more than the PB and SDB-H patterns. The latter effect was paralleled by greater blood pressure variability and baroreflex effectiveness index during SDB-L. Cardiovascular changes did not mediate the observed effects of breathing patterns on pain. PERSPECTIVES: SDB is more efficacious to attenuate pain when breathing is paced at a slow rhythm with an expiration that is long relative to inspiration, but the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 12-2020
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 18-12-2014
DOI: 10.1002/EJP.637
Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of chronic pain on interpretation bias for ambiguous faces, using a recently developed paradigm with ecologically valid stimuli. Fifty patients with chronic pain and 25 healthy controls were trained to respond to probes following the presentation of happy or painful faces, using an incidental learning task. During a test phase, ambiguous faces were presented. The degree to which participants were faster to respond to probes presented where painful (rather than happy) faces had previously been presented was taken as an indication of the interpretation bias towards painful faces. All participants had learnt the originally presented contingency. As predicted, chronic pain patients showed a greater bias towards interpreting ambiguous faces as painful than control participants. Further, there were correlations between fear of pain and catastrophizing and interpretation bias, indicating that participants with higher fear of pain and higher scores on a measure of catastrophizing were more likely to interpret ambiguous faces as painful. Severity of pain was inversely associated with increased interpretation bias for pain. These results show clear evidence that chronic pain patients do demonstrate an interpretation bias towards painful faces and that this bias is greater for those who catastrophize more and have higher levels of fear of pain, but experienced less pain in the preceding week. Given the recent potential shown for interventions that modify cognitive biases, this paradigm would seem to be well suited to future efforts to modify interpretation biases in pain.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 05-2020
DOI: 10.1016/J.JPAIN.2019.10.002
Abstract: The aim of the study reported in this paper is to investigate the effect of slow-deep breathing (SDB) on self-reported pain, heart rate variability, and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). These effects are examined in 3 separate experiments, each using a different phasic pain modality. For each experiment, different subjects were recruited. Eighty-three healthy female participants were instructed to breathe guided by a visual cue at a slow frequency (SDB: .1 Hz), and at a frequency close to the spontaneous breathing frequency (normal paced breathing, .2 Hz). Pain was induced during instructed breathing using electrocutaneous (experiment 1, n = 31), thermal (experiment 2, n = 28), or mechanical stimuli (experiment 3, n = 24). Participants were requested to rate the intensity of each painful stimulus (Numerical Rating Scale) and subjective level of pleasantness, arousal, and dominance (self-assessment manikin). During the experiment, R-R interval, blood pressure, tidal volume, and end-tidal CO
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Location: Iran (Islamic Republic of)
No related grants have been discovered for Hassan Jafari.