ORCID Profile
0000-0003-0916-4493
Current Organisation
Syekh Nurjati State Institute of Islamic Studies
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Oxford University PressOxford
Date: 25-11-2022
DOI: 10.1093/OSO/9780192870681.003.0012
Abstract: The amendment to the 1945 Constitution introduced a new phrase: ‘religious values’ (nilai-nilai agama). The new phrase has been designed to accommodate a highly religious society. It is mentioned twice in the Constitution, first, in Article 28J(2) on the limitations of constitutional rights, and second, in Article 31(5) on the duty of the government to uphold these values in education. This chapter critically evaluates the ambiguity of the phrase ‘religious values’, as reflected by a number of related constitutional cases. Specifically, it examines the meaning and the application of the phrase by discussing how far the Constitutional Court has endorsed the limitation on religious freedom based on ‘religious values’ as a constitutional requirement.
Publisher: UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri
Date: 2013
Abstract: Sebagai salah satu tema penting dalam ushul fiqh, qat'iy-zanni menyentuh dimensi radikal dan fundamental dari pengetahuan akan hukum Islam. Hal-hal yang pasti dalam agama selama ini telah dirumuskan atas dasar konsep ini. Tulisan ini mendemonstrasikan kritik salah seorang teoritisi utama hukum Islam, Abu Ishaq al-Syatibi, terhadap konsepsi ortodoksi qat'iy-zanni. Dengan menerima faktor ihtimalat 'asyrah dan infirad dalam setiap dalil tekstual, al-Syatibi meragukan eksistensi qat'i versi ulama ushul. Penerimaan terhadap faktor-faktor tersebut tidak menjadikannya skeptis terhadap kepastian hukum Islam. Dalam tulisan ini ditunjukkan bagaimana al-Syatibi menganalisis secara kritis tiga kategori kepastian epistemik dalam hukum Islam, yaitu mutawatir lafzi, mutawatir ma'nawi, dan istiqra` ma'nawi. Dari ketiga kategori tersebut, al-Syatibi menerima dan menyokong dua kategori terakhir. Bahkan, ia secara ekstensif menunjukkan istiqra` ma'nawi sebagai sebagai jalan keluar atas problem epistemologis tersebut. Penggunaan bentuk kepastian terakhir ini menunjukkan keunikan tawaran epistemologis al-Syatibi dalam sejarah teori hukum Islam.
Publisher: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Date: 31-12-2021
DOI: 10.31078/CONSREV722
Abstract: This paper examines the problem of whether the inclusion of religious words in the Indonesian Constitution is tantamount to the establishment of a religious constitution. By focusing on the Constitution’s provision on “belief in the One and Only God” in Article 29(1), this paper challenges the received theory of the religiosity of the Constitution. To that end, the paper first investigates the doctrinal and historical implications of Article 29(1). Particular analysis concerns the implications of this constitutionalization for Islamic law. The Constitutional Court’s decision on interreligious marriage is critically examined as an ex le of how the received theory is endorsed and articulated in the case of marriage. This paper argues that Article 29(1) concerns all religions, without any implied exclusion of non-monotheistic religions. Moreover, this paper affirms what is called the Pancasila state, located between an exclusively secular state and a religious or theocratic state. This arguably makes the notion of the religiosity of the Constitution unjustified. The Constitutional Court, however, has interpreted Article 29(1) in a strongly religious sense, leading to religious supremacy and, accordingly, is contrary to how the Constitution ought to be understood.
Publisher: IAIN Samarinda
Date: 25-06-2020
Abstract: The making of the 2004 Constitution was a significant moment amidst the continuing conflicts in Afghanistan. It was an attempt to transform differences and conflicts into a shared agenda for the future of the country. The process of constitution-making in Afghanistan was marked by intense negotiations between the international community and actors, on the one hand, and domestic actors, on the other. The outcome would be called a “win-win solution”. This essay focuses on the making of the Islam-related clauses: How was the public participation? How has the negotiation been undertaken? What was the result and why? This essay is an attempt to answer those questions. It will argue that the process of constitution-making in Afghanistan particularly with regard to the Islam clauses is the acts of negotiations between different competing actors. The Constitution is the product of negotiations not only between international and domestic actors, but also between domestic actors. As evident in the making of the Islam clauses, these negotiations might be characterized as between puritan Islamist and more moderate Muslim actors.Keywords: constitution-making, Afghanistan, the 2004 Constitution, Islam clauses, Islamic.
Location: Indonesia
No related grants have been discovered for Ahmad Rofii.