ORCID Profile
0000-0002-6536-8442
Current Organisation
RMIT University
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
In Research Link Australia (RLA), "Research Topics" refer to ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes. These topics are either sourced from ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes listed in researchers' related grants or generated by a large language model (LLM) based on their publications.
Social Change | Sociology | Studies of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Society | Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Policy |
Expanding Knowledge through Studies of Human Society | Government and Politics not elsewhere classified | Expanding Knowledge in Language, Communication and Culture
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 22-11-2022
Publisher: Intellect
Date: 12-2007
Publisher: Project MUSE
Date: 2016
Publisher: Linkoping University Electronic Press
Date: 06-2016
DOI: 10.3384/SVID.2000-964X.13129
Abstract: What is holding back service design from making a distinct departure from a product-centred to a socio-material human-centred framework? We have a concern for co-designing that is often discussed as a generic method to develop empathetic connections and understandings of people and their contexts. In this use, mastering the craft of co-designing had inadvertently isolated the method from the practitioner, fragmenting its process as a series of static events or a tool for deployment in staged workshops. Contributing to current debates on co-designing and design anthropology, our paper seeks to re-entangle co-designing back into its lived and enacted contexts. We see co-designing as a reflexive, embodied process of discovery and actualisation, and it is an integral, on-going activity of designing services. Co-designing can catalyse a transformative process in revealing and unlocking tacit knowledge, moving people along on a journey to 'make real' what proposed services might be like in the future. Co-designing plays a critical role especially when it involves the very people who are enmeshed in the realisation of the proposed services itself. As such, our case study of a weekend Ordnance Survey Geovation c pays closer attention to how this took place and discusses the transformative process that was central to it. By taking a phenomenological perspective and building on a seminal anthropologists' work, Tim Ingold, our paper counters the limitations in service design that tends to see its process as a contained series of fixed interactions or systemized process of methods. Through Ingold, we see 'the social world as a tangle of threads or life-paths, ever ravelling here and unravelling there, within which the task for any being is to improvise a way through, and to keep on-going. Lives are bound up in the tangle.' Similarly, we view co-designing as being and becoming, that is constantly transforming and connecting multiple entanglements.
Publisher: Now Publishers
Date: 2022
DOI: 10.1561/1100000085
Publisher: ACM
Date: 06-10-2014
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2022
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-10-2015
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2020
Publisher: ACM
Date: 29-11-2010
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 05-2012
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-04-2015
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2019
Publisher: ACM
Date: 04-06-2016
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 16-09-2022
DOI: 10.1177/01634437211040952
Abstract: This paper takes a design anthropology approach to understanding the learnings, challenges and opportunities Victorians adopted to choreograph practices of care in and through media practice during and after the Australian 2019–2020 bushfire crisis. In doing so, we frame our inquiry from a perspective of how in iduals and communities care through media practice. The study weaves together experiences around informal and formal crisis communication media – such as the government’s VicEmergency App, Australian and international news media and social media sharing – to map what we call the careful attunements of choreographing care.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2019
Publisher: Emerald
Date: 08-02-2016
DOI: 10.1108/IJDRBE-08-2013-0034
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to introduce and critique frameworks of communication in Australian bushfire management. Achieving bushfire preparedness is a complex process that centres on meaningful communication and relationships between fire emergency agencies and the residents at risk. However, the practice of bushfire communication in Australia might better be described as bricoleur-like, applying and adapting whatever is at hand from the broader media panoply, rather than involving a more deliberative and comprehensively planned approach to preparedness. This paper builds on different frameworks of communication, beyond the traditional transmission and power models, to establish alternative ways in which communication may take place in bushfire preparedness. It is built from coupling theoretical and social science approaches to communication and through interviews and fieldwork in four states across Australia. The aggregation of these data became the basis to examine how communication was taking place among these constituents. Communication as transmission still remains dominant from the perspective where expertise is marshaled among fire agency specialists and disseminated to the public. Communication as power highlights that the persistence of the transmission process can reinforce power dynamics, diminishing empowerment, participation and capacity-building for change by the community. Recognising the importance for understanding audiences, communication as marketing pays closer attention to attitudes to influence behaviour. Finally, communication as community elaborates the conversational aspects of knowledge flow, through social networks, bringing a particular focus to bear on the greater need for community agency. The authors put forward these frameworks as ways to analyse, critique and propose different ways that communication can, and does, occur, resulting in different kinds of interaction and impact. The authors argue that an awareness of such frameworks is significant in assisting the communities and fire authorities in bushfire preparedness.
Publisher: ACM Press
Date: 2014
Publisher: ACM
Date: 04-06-2016
Publisher: Common Ground Research Networks
Date: 2007
Publisher: Emerald
Date: 02-09-2013
DOI: 10.1108/IJDRBE-01-2014-0010
Abstract: – This paper aims to present on-going research on the role of social networks in community preparedness for bushfire. Social networks are significant in helping communities cope in disasters. Studies of communities hit by a catastrophe such as landslides or heatwaves demonstrate that people with well-connected social networks are more likely to recover than others where their networks are obliterated or non-existent. The value of social networks is also evident in bushfire where information is passed between family, friends and neighbours. Social interactions are important in creating opportunities for residents to exchange information on shared risks and can lead them to take collective actions to address this risk. – This paper presents on-going research on social networks of residents living in fire-prone areas in Australia to investigate how knowledge related to bushfire might flow, either in preparation for, or during a hypothetical emergency. A closer examination of social relations and characteristics within networks is critical in contextualizing this knowledge flow. This understanding will contribute to collected evidence that social networks play a particularly important role in collective action in building adaptive capacity. – The types of networks studied reflects how people’s emergent roles and their inter-relatedness with one another helps to build adaptive capacity and greater awareness of the risks they face from fire. In doing so, the paper questions in idualized attributes of “leaders” that disaster literature can over-emphasize, and critiques notions “vulnerability” in a social network context. It demonstrates that social capital can be generated through emergent, contextual, processual factors. – The paper contributes critical knowledge and evidence for fire agencies to engage with community networks and support those people who are playing a vital catalytic, bridging and linking role to strengthen their potential for adaptive capacity in mitigating bushfire risk.
Publisher: ACM
Date: 19-08-2022
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-02-2017
Publisher: ACM
Date: 18-04-2015
Publisher: Design Research Society
Date: 28-06-2018
Publisher: ACM
Date: 22-11-2010
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2017
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 09-2013
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 04-05-2018
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2017
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Start Date: 04-2015
End Date: 06-2019
Amount: $600,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded Activity