ORCID Profile
0000-0002-8455-8946
Current Organisations
Khalifa University
,
University of Bristol
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: CRC Press
Date: 23-06-2022
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 11-2010
DOI: 10.1193/1.3486689
Publisher: Seismological Society of America (SSA)
Date: 21-10-2014
DOI: 10.1785/0120130331
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 05-2010
DOI: 10.1193/1.3353626
Abstract: The M w 6.4 Achaia–Elia (Greece) earthquake on 8 June 2008 was a right-lateral strike-slip event on a nearly vertical faul. Moment tensor solutions coupled with geologic structure and aftershock distributions suggest a fault strike of approximately 210° on a previously unmapped fault. Rupture appears to have been concentrated over a 10–25 km depth range and did not break the surface. The northern rupture limit appears to correspond to a NW-striking normal fault near the Kato Achaia coastline. The mainshock was recorded by 27 accelerometers at distances from the surface projection of the fault ranging from approximately 15 to 350 km. The data demonstrate faster distance attenuation than predicted by contemporary Greek ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs). On the other hand, an NGA GMPE generally captures the distance attenuation but shows underprediction bias at short and long periods. Despite the presence of a range of site conditions at recording stations in the city of Patras, we find no obvious effect of sediment depth on response spectra. We show the possible presence of rupture directivity at the north end of this bilateral rupture, but no apparent effect at the southern end. We described several relatively well-documented incidents of nonground failure and ground failure associated with liquefaction/lateral spreading and landslides.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 2003
DOI: 10.3141/1845-14
Abstract: Subway tunnel condition assessment presents significant challenges for engineers and managers and is becoming increasingly important as the systems continue to age. Tunnels are in constant heavy use in an aggressive environment. Tunnel systems are vast, dark, and noisy. The national investment in subway tunnels is enormous, and careful maintenance and management are necessary to protect this investment. Technologies that can rapidly and accurately access the condition of subway tunnels without interfering with the normal operation of the system were studied. First, issues and problems in subway tunnel maintenance were reviewed through the literature and by interviewing transit agency managers and engineers. Next, different nondestructive evaluation (NDE) methods including spectral analysis of surface waves, impact echo, ground-penetrating radar, and impulse response were evaluated to determine the advantages and limitations of these methods on different problems like water leakage, corrosion, and cracks in subway tunnel systems. Issues of data and infrastructure management were also considered. NDE technologies have considerable potential for improving the maintenance and management of transit infrastructure. However, to fully realize that potential, further development is needed. It is necessary to distinguish between methods that require interruption of subway traffic from those that do not. Rapid screening NDE methods must be researched to develop clear signals of delamination, moisture-related damage, and other issues of concern. It is also necessary to develop automated procedures to process the vast amounts of data generated during extensive NDE testing. Case studies and demonstration projects must be developed and documented to convince managers of the utility of this approach.
Location: United States of America
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Location: United States of America
No related grants have been discovered for George Mylonakis.