ORCID Profile
0000-0002-6618-9235
Current Organisations
Monash University
,
Macquarie University
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
In Research Link Australia (RLA), "Research Topics" refer to ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes. These topics are either sourced from ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes listed in researchers' related grants or generated by a large language model (LLM) based on their publications.
Gender Specific Studies | Other Studies in Human Society | Access to Justice | Criminology not elsewhere classified
Gender and Sexualities | Justice and the Law not elsewhere classified | Criminal Justice |
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 03-07-2015
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 02-08-2023
DOI: 10.1007/S10896-023-00619-2
Abstract: Technology-facilitated domestic abuse (TFDA) is a prevalent form of domestic abuse. While police are recognized as critical first responders to intimate partner violence, there is limited research about what the challenges to policing TFDA are perceived to be and how they might be addressed. This article speaks to this issue. Between April 2020 and June 2022, n = 196 Australian and n = 256 United Kingdom representatives of services engaged with domestic abuse victim-survivors participated in an online survey about TFDA. Survey components asked respondents to report on challenges to policing TFDA. The authors analyzed these comments. Key themes identified from the survey responses regarding challenges to policing TFDA include that participants held perceptions that (a) police do not recognize TFDA as an aspect of coercive control and thus do not recognize its seriousness, (b) police receive inadequate training about TFDA, (c) police have insufficient time and personnel to tackle TFDA and (d) evidence collection is an obstacle to policing TFDA. The study points to a need to address the perceived concerns associated with policing TFDA to effectively respond to domestic abuse in the digital age and ensure domestic abuse perpetrators who misuse emerging technologies are held accountable.
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 07-2017
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 07-2017
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 22-06-2023
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 10-2020
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 07-2016
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 08-03-2023
DOI: 10.1007/S10896-023-00518-6
Abstract: This article investigates survivors’ experiences participating in research interviews about technology-facilitated domestic violence. University research ethics committees often assume that participating in research on violence and abuse is distressing for survivors. Scholars have called for research testing this assumption. This article contributes to the evidence base on the benefits and risks of asking research participants about gender-based violence. This article is based on semi-structured interviews with 20 Australian domestic violence survivors. Template analysis was used to code the interviews and develop key themes. The five themes derived from the interviews include reflection on recovery and personal growth helping other women rejecting victim-shaming empowerment and the importance of timing. All participants reported positive experiences taking part in the study. However, the authors noticed substantial differences in participant narratives across service cohorts. The implications of recruiting through channels associated with different points in trauma trajectories warrant attention.
Publisher: No publisher found
Date: 2018
Publisher: Queensland University of Technology
Date: 03-2022
DOI: 10.5204/IJCJSD.2190
Abstract: The abuse of technology by perpetrators of domestic violence is ‘spaceless’ however, in this article, we argue that experiences of and responses to digital coercive control are shaped by both the place (geographic location) and space (practical and ideological features of a location) that a victim/survivor and criminal justice agency occupy. We examined this issue by conducting interviews and focus groups with 13 female victim/survivors in regional, rural and remote Australia. All participants had contact with police as part of their help-seeking for domestic violence, and some suggested that officers sometimes paralleled perpetrator behaviours, resulting in a narrowing of women’s ‘space for action’. We conclude that, in the interests of protecting and empowering women, socio-spatial frameworks must be considered by practitioners and researchers, and there should be a concerted effort to expand resourcing and training for justice agencies beyond the cityscape.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 22-08-2022
DOI: 10.1177/10778012221114920
Abstract: This article draws on interviews with 20 Australian women subjected to technology-facilitated coercive control (TFCC), foregrounding their accounts of grief and institutional betrayal. Findings show that while the harms of TFCC were significant, survivors’ experiences were often minimized and dismissed by justice institutions. Women experienced grief due to abuse and separation from partners who had betrayed them. This loss was compounded when seeking help. We propose that disenfranchised grief is an underexplored response to domestic violence and institutional betrayal as well as a potential intervention site, particularly in relation to technology-facilitated abuse.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 16-06-2022
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 20-03-2018
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 24-07-2017
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 18-07-2023
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 09-01-2019
DOI: 10.1093/BJC/AZY068
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Date: 2018
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 29-09-2019
DOI: 10.1002/POI3.185
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 07-2016
Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Date: 29-10-2017
Abstract: This paper reports the findings based on ALOS-1 and GRACE satellite data for the purpose of monitoring land surface subsidence due to groundwater extraction and underground mining activities in the Ordos Basin, China. 42 ALOS-1 PALSAR data (22 images from Frame 790 while 20 scenes from Frame 780) acquired between 8 January 2007 and 19 January 2011 are utilized in the time-series InSAR (TS-InSAR) analysis while the total water storage observations derived from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite data are integrated with hydrological modeling results (for soil moisture modelling) to estimate the groundwater depletion rate. Since the results have vast difference in spatial resolution between GRACE (~300 km) and InSAR (~10’s of meters), the two measurements are not comparable over the same region. Instead, we applied them to Haolebaoji surrounding region and ALOS covered area, respectively. The groundwater change series of about –7.3 mm yr –1 between December 2006 and June 2012 is detected, which is then being exploited to explain the groundwater induced subsidence in Haolebaoji, Inner Mongolia. Within ALOS covered region, time-series analysis was carried out to explain the local subsidence. Then the total area size of underground mining sites is estimated, and we concluded that human involved activities contribute a lot to the total velocity and this part of subsidence should be excluded before estimating the final mean velocity (–4.9 mm yr –1 in vertical direction) when comparing with GRACE-based groundwater depletion series. Last but not least, some suggestions are given on how to make a rational comparison between the InSAR derived mean velocity with GRACE-based groundwater depletion trend together. This study could help the local government and associated geotechnical engineers to have a better understanding of the groundwater induced subsidence in this region.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 25-08-2022
Publisher: MDPI AG
Date: 24-06-2016
DOI: 10.3390/RS8070543
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 07-2015
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 08-12-2016
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 08-06-2021
Start Date: 07-2020
End Date: 01-2024
Amount: $405,325.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded Activity