ORCID Profile
0000-0002-8272-092X
Current Organisations
The University of Edinburgh
,
NHS Lothian
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: BMJ
Date: 03-2023
DOI: 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2022-070504
Abstract: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) are common in the adult population, but only a relatively small proportion will rupture. It is therefore essential to have accurate estimates of rupture risk to target treatment towards those who stand to benefit and avoid exposing patients to the risks of unnecessary treatment. The best available UIA natural history data are the PHASES study. However, this has never been validated and given the known heterogeneity in the populations, methods and biases of the constituent studies, there is a need to do so. There are also many potential predictors not considered in PHASES that require evaluation, and the estimated rupture risk is largely based on short-term follow-up (mostly 1 year). The aims of this study are to: (1) test the accuracy of PHASES in a UK population, (2) evaluate additional predictors of rupture and (3) assess long-term UIA rupture rates. The Risk of Aneurysm Rupture study is a longitudinal multicentre study that will identify patients with known UIA seen in neurosurgery units. Patients will have baseline demographics and aneurysm characteristics collected by their neurosurgery unit and then a single aggregated national cohort will be linked to databases of hospital admissions and deaths to identify all patients who may have subsequently suffered a subarachnoid haemorrhage. All matched admissions and deaths will be checked against medical records to confirm the diagnosis of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. The target s le size is 20 000 patients. The primary outcome will be aneurysm rupture resulting in hospital admission or death. Cox regression models will be built to test each of the study’s aims. Ethical approval has been given by South Central H shire A Research Ethics Committee (21SC0064) and Confidentiality Advisory Group support (21CAG0033) provided under Section 251 of the NHS Act 2006. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals. ISRCTN17658526 .
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 27-05-2015
Abstract: Cerebral vasospasm is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) surviving the initial ictus. Commonly used techniques for vasospasm assessment are digital subtraction angiography and transcranial Doppler sonography. These techniques can reliably identify only the major vessel spasm and fail to estimate its haemodynamic significance. To overcome these issues and to enable comprehensive non-invasive assessment of vasospasm inside the interventional suite, a novel protocol involving measurement of parenchymal blood volume (PBV) using C-arm flat detector computed tomography (FDCT) was implemented. Patients from the neuro-intensive treatment unit (ITU) with suspected vasospasm following aneurysmal SAH were scanned with a biplane C-arm angiography system using an intravenous contrast injection protocol. The PBV maps were generated using prototype software. Contemporaneous clinically indicated MR scan including the diffusion- and perfusion-weighted sequences was performed. C-arm PBV maps were compared against the MR perfusion maps. Distribution of haemodynamic impairment on C-arm PBV maps closely matched the pattern of abnormality on MR perfusion maps. On visual comparison between the two techniques, the extent of abnormality indicated PBV to be both cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood volume weighted. C-arm FDCT PBV measurements allow an objective assessment of the severity and localisation of cerebral hypoperfusion resulting from vasospasm. The technique has proved feasible and useful in very sick patients after aneurysmal SAH. The promise shown in this early study indicates that it deserves further evaluation both for post-SAH vasospasm and in other relevant clinical settings.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 12-2011
DOI: 10.1177/197140091102400609
Abstract: The appropriate timing for endovascular intervention after brain arteriovenous malformation (bAVM) rupture is not known. This paper aims to determine factors that lead to early endovascular intervention and to investigate whether early intervention has the same complication rate as late intervention in a single centre. All patients who underwent endovascular treatment for a ruptured bAVM at our institution in the period January 2007 and July 2010 were included in this retrospective observational study. Of 50 patients, 33 had early endovascular intervention, defined as within 30 days of haemorrhage and the remaining 17 patients had endovascular treatment at day 30 or beyond. A greater proportion of patients treated within the first 30 days were in neurointensive care preoperatively (51.5% vs. 23.5%, p=0.07). A ‘high-risk’ angioarchitectural feature was identified in more patients who had acute intervention (78.8% vs. 11.8%, p .0001) and targeted embolization was also more frequent in this group (48.5% vs. 5.9%, p=0.004). Nidal aneurysms, venous varices and impaired venous outflow (venous stenosis) were the principal ‘high risk’ features. Clinically apparent complications occurred in 10.8% of procedures with permanent neurological deficit in 3.6%. There was no directly procedure-related mortality. There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rate of early procedures compared with delayed interventions (12.5% vs. 7.4%, p=0.71). Greater initial injury severity and the presence of high-risk lesion characteristics are the factors that lead to early endovascular intervention. Early intervention is associated with a higher complication rate, but this difference is not statistically significant.
Publisher: BMJ
Date: 24-06-2023
Abstract: Physician variablity in preoperative planning of endovascular implant deployment and associated inaccuracies have not been documented. This study aimed to quantify the variability in accuracy of physician flow erter (FD) planning and directly compares it with PreSize Neurovascular (Oxford Heartbeat Ltd) software simulations. Eight experienced neurointerventionalists (NIs), blinded to procedural details, were provided with preoperative 3D rotational angiography (3D-RA) volumetric data along with images annotated with the distal landing location of a deployed Surpass Evolve (Stryker Neurovascular) FD from 51 patient cases. NIs were asked to perform a planning routine reflecting their normal practice and estimate the stent’s proximal landing using volumetric data and the labeled dimensions of the FD used. Equivalent deployed length estimation was performed using PreSize software. NI- and software-estimated lengths were compared with postprocedural observed deployed stent length (control) using Bland–Altman plots. NI assessment agreement was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The mean accuracy of NI-estimated deployed FD length was 81% (±15%) versus PreSize’s accuracy of 95% (±4%), demonstrating significantly higher accuracy for the software (p .001). The mean absolute error between estimated and control lengths was 4 mm (±3.5 mm, range 0.03–30.2 mm) for NIs and 1 mm (±0.9 mm, range 0.01–3.9 mm) for PreSize. No discernable trends in accuracy among NIs or across vasculature and aneurysm morphology (size, vessel diameter, tortuousity) were found. The study quantified experienced physicians’ significant variablity in predicting an FD deployment with current planning approaches. In comparison, PreSize-simulated FD deployment was consistently more accurate and reliable, demonstrating its potential to improve standard of practice.
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
No related grants have been discovered for Jonathan Downer.