ORCID Profile
0000-0001-9709-5939
Current Organisation
The University of Canberra
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
In Research Link Australia (RLA), "Research Topics" refer to ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes. These topics are either sourced from ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes listed in researchers' related grants or generated by a large language model (LLM) based on their publications.
Policy and Administration | Australian Government And Politics | Public Administration | Applied Ethics | Law And Society | Criminology | Comparative Government And Politics | Public Administration | Comparative Government and Politics | Organisational Planning And Management | Applied Ethics (Incl. Bioethics And Environmental Ethics) | Criminology | Sociology and Social Studies of Science and Technology | Corporations And Associations Law
Public services management | Justice and the law not elsewhere classified | Federalism in Australia | Religion and ethics not elsewhere | Government and politics not elsewhere classified | Electronic Information Storage and Retrieval Services | Public Services Policy Advice and Analysis |
Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd
Date: 2007
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 06-2005
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Date: 2010
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 09-2020
DOI: 10.1111/CAPA.12386
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
Date: 18-05-2020
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited
Date: 25-08-2022
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 24-07-2013
Publisher: No publisher found
Date: 1991
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 28-01-2021
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
Date: 31-10-2013
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
Date: 2014
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Date: 2015
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 27-04-2015
Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd
Date: 2006
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Date: 2007
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2021
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 03-2013
Abstract: The agreements between the Australian senior public service and the political executive have undergone several shifts during the reform era of the last thirty years. These have involved fundamental redefinitions of the role, responsibilities, identity and autonomy of the senior public servant.There has been a succession of challenges to the relationship focusing on the role and status of the public service on the one hand and the behaviour and resources of the political executive on the other. Over time the trend has been towards strengthening the political executive, but punctuated by debates about issues that slowed the rate of change and contained political pressures on the public service. This process has produced clarifications of central aspects of the relationship and a clearer articulation of the range of roles provided by departmental secretaries. The article examines the evolution of public service bargains centred on the changing roles of the secretaries of departments of state, and analyses the implications of the changing relationship for the role and functioning of the public service in governance and public policy. Points for practitioners The article addresses how the roles of departmental secretaries in Australia have varied in significance during the reform era. A new arrangement has now emerged which clearly articulates the roles and codifies them. One of the roles, stewardship, recognizes that secretaries have a part to play independently of ministers.
Publisher: ANU Press
Date: 12-2008
DOI: 10.22459/CE.12.2008
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 12-1977
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 03-1985
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 11-2005
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 04-2001
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 13-12-2018
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 10-06-2010
Publisher: ANU Press
Date: 07-2012
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 09-1987
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 03-2004
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 02-05-2021
Abstract: The paper investigates whether performance measurement drives performance improvement in Australian government agencies. Because the answer to such a question is rarely unconditional, contextual factors such as jurisdiction and type of organisation are considered. The paper uses documents such as budgets and annual reports of nine government agencies in three Australian jurisdictions to analyse how results against targets influence subsequent measured performance. It finds that performance measurement does not drive performance improvement for the agencies studied. The paper also explores two types of mechanism by which performance measurement might improve performance in Australian government agencies. One mechanism is that setting targets focuses effort leading to improved performance. A second mechanism assumes that policy intent plus resources leads to good performance measures, which produces better information and decisions and hence higher performance. No discernible impacts of these mechanisms on performance improvements in these agencies were observed. A systems‐based approach to understanding the forces acting on managers and organisations showed that the mechanisms described above were less effective than countervailing influences that tended to derogate from the use of performance measurement.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 03-1980
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 07-2007
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2015
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date: 05-11-2020
Abstract: In turbulent environments and unstable political contexts, policy advisory systems have become more volatile. The policy advisory system in Anglophone countries is composed of different types of advisers who have input into government decision making. Government choices about who advises them varies widely as they demand contestability, greater partisan input and more external consultation. The professional advice of the public service may be disregarded. The consequences for public policy are immense depending on whether a plurality of advice works effectively or is derailed by narrow and partisan agendas that lack an evidence base and implementation plans. The book seeks to addresses these issues within a comparative country analysis of how policy advisory systems are constituted and how they operate in the age of instability in governance and major challenges with how the complexity policy issue can be handled.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-01-2015
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 04-2007
Abstract: Public sector reform has persisted for a sufficient length of time in several countries to examine patterns over the longer term. Australia and New Zealand are both early and long-term reforming countries that display distinctive features as well as being Anglophone countries identified with new public management. As third generation reformers, the products of more than two decades of reform activity are becoming clearer: the starker manifestations of new public management have less prominence now and a set of distinctive trends has emerged with commonalities across the two countries. The synthesis of elements in the third generation suggests that system integration and performance are central to the prevailing approach and that an emergent model is best represented in the mid-2000s as integrating governance. The article explores the constituent elements and significance of the new model and its relationship to earlier models.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 09-1991
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 13-07-2016
Publisher: Emerald
Date: 09-03-2012
DOI: 10.1108/17410401211205623
Abstract: This article seeks to assess how performance management in the public domain has evolved over the last several years both in terms of theory and practice in selected countries. The paper also aims to act as the editorial for the special issue of the journal. Drawing on Bouckaert and Halligan as a framework for analysing performance management in the public sector, this paper reviews findings from their work (on the evolution of cases from six countries), a recent survey of seven countries from four continents, and three additional case studies at the micro, meso and macro levels of analysis. The article finds that the evidence for progress towards a “performance governance” regime in the public domain is mixed, with little progress in countries outside the Anglo‐American or Nordic ex les studied by Bouckaert and Halligan. Several reasons for this are suggested from the recent survey (in this issue), including the impact of public sector values and the role of elites. However, case studies of particular sectors in countries with limited progress on performance management in general (Portugal and Ireland) suggest that significant inroads can nevertheless be made along the trajectory proposed by Bouckaert and Halligan at micro and meso levels. The paper draws together evidence from various ex les of performance management in the public domain to critically assess and extend existing theory and to suggest alternative trajectories on the road to performance governance.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 12-2020
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 22-04-2004
DOI: 10.1002/PAD.320
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 23-09-2015
DOI: 10.1093/PA/GSV044
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 02-10-2015
Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited
Date: 29-03-2018
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Date: 22-01-2021
DOI: 10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190228637.013.1372
Abstract: The politicization of public services has been a relentless trend in public administration internationally. It can be attributed to the increasing demands on executive government, heightened partisanship and polarization, higher expectations about achieving official goals, and contextual factors that dilute the neutrality of the bureaucracy. It is also apparent that the spread of politicization has increased (i.e., encompassing countries once thought to be low on politicization) as has its breadth and depth (often extending down the bureaucracy and affecting a wide range of public servants). Within this broader trend, the timing and pace of politicization has varied widely among countries, some having long histories (several of the classic models of the “political civil servant”) and others being newcomers. Politicization takes a number of forms, most of which focus on political control and influence. Often there is a dominant instrument, such as relying on politically committed appointees, but multiple levers apply in many cases. A remarkable range of approaches has evolved to address political control. The rationale for particular types is generally shaped by an administrative tradition and reflects country contexts and circumstances. A strong case exists for partisan support to enhance the capacity of political executives, to counterbalance the vested interests of bureaucrats, to facilitate coalition government, and to ensure support at the top for government objectives and priorities. However, politicization can be arbitrary, chaotic, r ant, and overly focused on partisan and in idual interests.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 08-03-2011
Publisher: de Gruyter Recht
Date: 31-03-2023
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 23-03-2016
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 07-1976
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 03-2005
Start Date: 07-2003
End Date: 08-2008
Amount: $290,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 12-2003
End Date: 12-2004
Amount: $10,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 06-2004
End Date: 12-2009
Amount: $1,500,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 04-2008
End Date: 04-2011
Amount: $236,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 02-2017
End Date: 12-2022
Amount: $299,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded Activity