ORCID Profile
0000-0003-4527-0082
Current Organisation
The University of Auckland
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 07-2017
Publisher: American Physiological Society
Date: 08-2002
DOI: 10.1152/AJPREGU.00489.2001
Abstract: The aim in the present experiments was to assess the dynamic baroreflex control of blood pressure, to develop an accurate mathematical model that represented this relationship, and to assess the role of dynamic changes in heart rate and stroke volume in giving rise to components of this response. Patterned electrical stimulation [pseudo-random binary sequence (PRBS)] was applied to the aortic depressor nerve (ADN) to produce changes in blood pressure under open-loop conditions in anesthetized rabbits. The stimulus provided constant power over the frequency range 0–0.5 Hz and revealed that the composite systems represented by the central nervous system, sympathetic activity, and vascular resistance responded as a second-order low-pass filter (corner frequency ≈0.047 Hz) with a time delay (1.01 s). The gain between ADN and mean arterial pressure was reasonably constant before the corner frequency and then decreased with increasing frequency of stimulus. Although the heart rate was altered in response to the PRBS stimuli, we found that removal of the heart's ability to contribute to blood pressure variability by vagotomy and β 1 -receptor blockade did not significantly alter the frequency response. We conclude that the contribution of the heart to the dynamic regulation of blood pressure is negligible in the rabbit. The consequences of this finding are examined with respect to low-frequency oscillations in blood pressure.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 08-2020
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 14-06-2016
DOI: 10.1002/RNC.3575
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 2004
DOI: 10.1111/J.1440-1681.2004.03947.X
Abstract: 1. We investigated how sympathetic nerve activity and renal perfusion pressure (RPP) interact in controlling renal haemodynamics in pentobarbitone-anaesthetized rabbits. 2. Renal blood flow (RBF) was reduced by electrical renal nerve stimulation (0.5-8 Hz), with RPP set using an extracorporeal circuit to 65, 100 and 135 mmHg. 3. Responses of RBF and cortical laser Doppler flux to renal nerve stimulation were blunted by increased RPP. For ex le, 4 Hz stimulation reduced RBF by 68 +/- 7% with baseline perfusion pressure approximately 65 mmHg, but only by 22 +/- 3% at approximately 135 mmHg. Medullary laser Doppler flux was less responsive than cortical laser Doppler flux to renal nerve stimulation and its response was not dependent on perfusion pressure. 4. When perfusion pressure was cl ed at its baseline level during renal nerve stimulation, responses of RBF and cortical laser Doppler flux, but not medullary laser Doppler flux, were still blunted with increased baseline perfusion pressure. 5. A frequency rich stimulus was applied to assess the effects of perfusion pressure on dynamic neural control of RBF. Renal blood flow responded similarly at each level of perfusion pressure, as a low-pass filter with a pure time delay. 6. Our results suggest that, in the rabbit extracorporeal circuit model, increased RPP blunts the ability of steady state renal nerve stimulation to reduce cortical, but not medullary perfusion. However, in this model the level of RPP appears to have little impact on dynamic neural control of RBF.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 08-1996
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-1998
Publisher: IEEE
Date: 12-2011
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Date: 04-2020
No related grants have been discovered for Sing Kiong Nguang.