ORCID Profile
0000-0002-7052-7794
Current Organisation
University of Queensland
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
In Research Link Australia (RLA), "Research Topics" refer to ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes. These topics are either sourced from ANZSRC FOR and SEO codes listed in researchers' related grants or generated by a large language model (LLM) based on their publications.
Sociology | Rural Sociology | Sociology Not Elsewhere Classified | Sociology not elsewhere classified | Environmental Sociology | Sustainable Development | Social Change |
Expanding Knowledge through Studies of Human Society | Behavioural and cognitive sciences | Environmental policy, legislation and standards not elsewhere classified
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2016
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 15-05-2017
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 06-05-2016
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Date: 04-03-2015
DOI: 10.1093/CDJ/BSV005
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 12-10-2015
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 25-06-2014
Abstract: Food movement advocates articulate a ersity of approaches to address the current food crisis. These approaches resonate with both food security and food sovereignty discourses and range between reform and radical rights-based theories of change. This paper draws from research with urban food advocates in Australia to provide insights into the relations between tactics to change food systems and their resonance with food security and food sovereignty discourses. On the basis of this analysis, the paper concludes that tactics for social change – or the food politics enacted by urban food advocates – both converge and erse with food security and food sovereignty discourses. These outcomes point to the ersity of approaches for identifying and evaluating pathways for rebuilding food systems.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 2002
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 10-03-2017
Abstract: This article analyses the sustainability school (SS) program of the National Association of Professional Environmentalists (NAPE), Uganda. The focus is on how the social network, enabled by the SS program, fosters social and transformative learning. The significance of this approach to community-based education for social change, including in the context of resource conflict and displacement, is considered. Findings focus on the local-level impacts of the program, including the ways in which collective and community organizing, and educational methodology shape both social and transformative learning. Discussion considers the importance of not only the “social” element of transformative learning but the need—within conflict and dangerous contexts—to link the social explicitly to building organization and a social movement that provides a structural container for people to engage in critical thinking and social action.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 29-09-2021
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 11-2005
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 2000
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2019
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 25-05-2021
DOI: 10.1177/00219096211019063
Abstract: This paper presents a political ecological analysis of the drivers and impacts of Green Revolution technologies – including improved seeds, chemical fertiliser and other agrochemicals – in the Brong Ahafo Region of Ghana. We identify national government, foreign investment and philanthro-capital as key drivers in shaping both narratives and uptake of Green Revolution technologies at the local level. Drawing from interviews and focus groups, our findings demonstrate that Green Revolution technologies deliver a range of negative local-level socio-ecological impacts, including increasing the overall costs of production, as well as exacerbating poverty and inequality amongst farmers. Our findings demonstrate the disconnection between claims that Green Revolution technologies increase food security and income, and lived experiences of farmers.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 08-2005
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 10-2016
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 17-06-2013
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 10-2004
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 25-10-2009
Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited
Date: 14-11-2018
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2013
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 1999
DOI: 10.5172/RSJ.9.3.543
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 28-08-2012
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 2001
DOI: 10.5172/RSJ.11.3.197
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 28-08-2012
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 19-02-2017
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 06-1999
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2016
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 28-06-2022
DOI: 10.1111/CSP2.12748
Abstract: The bio ersity and climate crises require erse solutions, yet peer reviewed literature is dominated by men from the Global North. The Nature Conservancy (TNC), as one of the world's largest conservation non‐profit organizations, provides a case study to better understand how women publish relative to men in conservation science. By examining all papers from Web of Science with at least one TNC author (1968–2019), we found that women at TNC are underrepresented: only 36% of authors were women, just 31% of all first authorships were women, and 24% of last authorships were women. Women in the Global South were the least represented group, making up less than 2% of all TNC authorships. By comparison seven in idual men in the Global North comprised 9% of all TNC authorships. Encouragingly, the total number of women publishing at TNC has improved over the decades however, the proportion of women to men remains below gender parity, and the proportion of women from Global South remains consistently below 3%. These results align with overall trends in conservation and science, and we provide recommendations for the global conservation science community on how to address this enduring and significant issue in publishing .
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 10-2014
Publisher: Routledge
Date: 18-10-2013
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 2006
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 06-2013
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 14-12-2017
Publisher: University of Arizona
Date: 27-09-2017
DOI: 10.2458/V24I1.20812
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 11-08-2015
Start Date: 07-2011
End Date: 02-2016
Amount: $446,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded ActivityStart Date: 2004
End Date: 07-2007
Amount: $175,000.00
Funder: Australian Research Council
View Funded Activity