ORCID Profile
0000-0002-6715-9468
Current Organisations
Australian National Fabrication Facility
,
Blamey & Saunders Hearing Pty Ltd
,
University of Limerick
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 02-2006
DOI: 10.1016/J.HEARES.2005.11.005
Abstract: The objective of this study was to compare the psychophysical performance of patients using the Nucleus Contour electrode array with that of patients using the straight banded-electrode array. In particular, we wished to consider how psychophysical parameters would differ for an electrode array positioned closer to the modiolus, and how this might influence both patient benefits and the design of speech processing strategies. Nine subjects participated in the study: four used the Nucleus straight array and five used the Nucleus Contour electrode array. Radiographic analyses found that the Contour array lay closer to the modiolus, was more deeply inserted and spanned a larger fractional length of the basilar membrane than the straight banded-electrode array. The results were analysed in terms of array type and of the position of the in idual electrode band, both distance from the modiolus and longitudinal placement. Mean threshold was lower for the Contour array but maximum comfortable level was similar. Whereas threshold varied significantly with distance of electrode band from the modiolus, maximum comfortable level did not. Pitch varied fairly regularly with longitudinal position of the stimulated electrode, with the exception of one Contour subject. The forward masking profiles, using moderately loud maskers, were narrower for the Contour array, indicative of more localized neural excitation.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 04-1976
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 04-2003
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 2004
DOI: 10.1080/14992020400050044
Abstract: The feasibility of using the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP), measured with the NRT system (Neural Response Telemetry) and the NRT software (version 2.04), to quantify the longitudinal spread of neural excitation was examined in four subjects fitted with the Nucleus C124M cochlear implant. The ECAP and psychophysical forward-masking profiles were measured using stimulation on each of three electrodes, in basal, middle and apical positions. Spatial spread profiles derived from the ECAP measure produced broader functions than those derived from the psychophysical measure. These results, together with investigation of the change of ECAP spread pattern with stimulation current, suggest that functions derived from this 'simple' method were more influenced by the spread of electric field from excited neuron to electrode array than by breadth of the neural excitation pattern. The recently released NRT version 3.0 permits the masker and probe pulses to be delivered to separate electrodes, thus removing a fundamental limitation of version 2.04. Results from a pilot study, in which this capability was exploited, suggest that the spatial functions from this 'advanced' method may provide a better correlation with results from psychophysical forward masking.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 04-2019
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 05-2003
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00096-0
Abstract: This study introduces and evaluates a method for measurement of the longitudinal spread of electrically evoked neural excitation in the cochlea, using the Neural Response Telemetry system (NRT) available with the Nucleus((R)) 24 cochlear implant system. The recently released version of the NRT software (version 3.0) enables presentation of the 'masker' and 'probe' on different electrodes. In the present method the probe position was fixed, while the masker position was varied across the electrode array. The litude of the response to the partially masked probe provides a measure of the amount of masking, which is dependent on the extent of overlap of the excitation regions of the masker and probe. These measurements were performed in seven subjects implanted with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system (four with straight and three with Contour electrode arrays), for basal, middle and apical probe electrodes. Similar excitation profiles were obtained using either the standard NRT subtraction paradigm or an alternative 'Miller' method. The excitation profiles were compared with those obtained from psychophysical forward masking and good agreement was found. The widths of electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and forward masking profiles did not differ significantly. Whereas the width of the ECAP measure was significantly correlated with both the maximum comfortable level and the distance of the electrode band from the modiolus, the width of the forward masking profile was not.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 05-2001
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(01)00248-9
Abstract: Psychophysical measurements were performed in three hearing-impaired adult subjects implanted with a CI22 cochlear prosthesis (Cochlear Ltd.) fitted with a developmental peri-modiolar electrode array. The array was manufactured with a curvature approximating that of the inner wall of the scala tympani but, after straightening and insertion, lay on average about half way between the inner and outer walls of the scala. All subjects were tested with bipolar stimulation two were also tested with monopolar, employing the most basal electrode as the return. Maximum comfortable level and threshold reduced with decreasing distance of electrode from the modiolus, whereas dynamic range increased. The linearity of the loudness growth function did not vary significantly with electrode position but the function was more non-linear for lower maximum comfortable levels. Current level discrimination, normalized with respect to dynamic range, improved with decreasing distance of electrode from the modiolus in two subjects. Pitch varied regularly with insertion depth of the stimulated electrode for bipolar stimulation in two subjects and also for monopolar stimulation in one subject. Electrode discrimination was enhanced by closeness to the modiolus. Whereas the forward masking patterns for bipolar stimulation of electrodes close to the modiolus had a sharp double-peaked structure, those for monopolar stimulation were flatter and had a single peak.
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Location: Australia
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Location: Australia
No related grants have been discovered for Elaine Saunders.