ORCID Profile
0000-0002-4909-9844
Current Organisations
RMIT University
,
University of Kansas
,
University of Southern Queensland
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Unpublished
Date: 2018
Publisher: Unpublished
Date: 2017
Publisher: Global Science and Technology Forum
Date: 24-05-2017
Publisher: Unpublished
Date: 2018
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Date: 2019
DOI: 10.1017/JRR.2019.7
Abstract: The term ‘self-sabotage’ is not well defined in the current literature. Self-sabotage is generally explained as a synonym of self-handicapping, which does not fully encompass intrinsic behaviours found in romantic relationships. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to explore the theme of self-sabotage as viewed by practising psychologists. A series of 15 semistructured interviews with psychologists specialising in romantic relationships around Australia identified the main issues contributing to self-sabotage in romantic relationships and the reason why it might happen. Future studies will need to be conducted to develop a scale to empirically test self-sabotage in romantic relationships.
Publisher: Global Science & Technology Forum (GSTF)
Date: 06-03-2017
Publisher: Unpublished
Date: 2018
Publisher: Unpublished
Date: 2017
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 28-05-2019
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 19-09-2021
DOI: 10.1186/S40359-021-00644-0
Abstract: Some in iduals are no longer entering romantic relationships, others move through relationships too quickly searching for “the one” and making quick assessments of their romantic partners, while others stay in their relationships but “check out” or do not work on their issues. These are conclusions from two studies: (1) an interview with psychologists who specialise in relationship therapy, and (2) an analysis of in iduals’ lived experiences of relationships. The concept of relationship sabotage can explain these phenomena. However, presently, there is no instrument to conceptualise and empirically measure how people continue to employ self-defeating attitudes and behaviors in (and out) of relationships to impede success, or withdraw effort, and justify failure. A series of three studies (involving a total of 1365 English speaking in iduals of erse gender orientation, sexual orientation, and cultural background, with relationship sabotage experience) were conceptualized for the current project to fill the need for scale development and to build empirical evidence on the topic of self-sabotage in romantic relationships. The scale was developed over two studies using exploratory factor analysis and one-congeneric model analyses. The third study, using confirmatory factor analysis, confirmed the final structure for the Relationship Sabotage Scale (RSS), which contains 12 items and three factors: defensiveness, trust difficulty, and lack of relationship skills. Constructive validity analyses were also conducted. The RSS is a brief scale that provides conclusive information about in idual patterns in relationships. Findings using this scale can offer explanations regarding the reasons that in iduals engage in destructive behaviours from one relationship to the next. Investigations should continue to test a model for sabotage in romantic relationships using the developed scale and other factors such as relationship differences and insecure attachment. More specifically, this measure can be used to understand mediator constructs of relational outcomes within the attachment framework to explain relationship dissolution and work towards relationship maintenance.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 20-04-2020
DOI: 10.1186/S12909-020-02025-4
Abstract: The erse rural medical education initiatives that have been developed in Australia to address the medical workforce maldistribution have been less successful in many smaller and remote communities. This study explored the factors that attract and retain GP registrars and supervisors and the impact that localised training (i.e., rural and remote workplace-based training and support) has on both GP registrars and supervisors, and the GP workforce in rural and remote underserved areas. A purposive s le of 79 GP registrars, supervisors, practice managers, health services staff and community representatives living and working in areas of low GP workforce in rural and remote Australia were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews and one focus group ided over two phases. Thematic analysis was used to explore themes within the data. Attractors and barriers to rural and remote practice were identified as the main themes. Attractors include family and community lifestyle factors, in idual intrinsic motivators, and remote medicine experiences. In contrast, barriers include work related, location, or family factors. Further, localised GP training was reported to specifically influence GP registrars and supervisors through education, social and financial factors. The current study has provided a contemporary overview of the issues encountered in expanding GP training capacity in rural and remote communities to improve the alignment of training opportunities with community and workforce needs. Strategies including matching scope of practice to registrar interests have been implemented to promote the attractors and lessen the barriers associated with rural and remote practice.
Publisher: Unpublished
Date: 2018
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 21-07-2021
No related grants have been discovered for Raquel Peel.