ORCID Profile
0000-0003-3226-7685
Current Organisation
UNESCO UNISA & iThemba LABS/NRF
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 02-2009
DOI: 10.1016/J.JVIROMET.2009.10.005
Abstract: The implementation of cost effective HIV-1 RNA quantitation assays in resource-poor settings is of paramount importance for monitoring HV-1 infection. A study comparing the analytical performance of three HIV-1 RNA assays (Generic HIV Viral Load, Amplicor v1.5 and Nuclisens EasyQ v1.2) was performed on 160 plasma s les from 160 consecutive antiretroviral treatment naive HIV-1-infected pregnant women assessed for eligibility in the Kesho Bora trial aimed at prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in three African countries (Burkina Faso, Kenya and South Africa). Correlation and agreement of results of the three assays were assessed for plasma HIV-1 RNA quantitation in specimens harbouring mainly sub-subtype A1, subtype C, and circulating recombinant form (CRF) 02_AG and CRF06_cpx. Good degrees of correlation and agreement were observed between these HIV-1 RNA assays. However, nine (9/160, 5.6%) strains detectable with the Generic HIV Viral Load assay were not detected by either the Amplicor (n=7) or EasyQ (n=2) test. One strain (0.6%) was missed with the Generic HIV Viral Load assay. Further, concordantly positive plasma s les harbouring CRF02_AG and CRF06_cpx yielded significantly higher HIV-1 RNA concentrations when tested by Generic HIV Viral Load, as compared to Amplicor v1.5 (mean differences, +0.33 and +0.67 log(10) copies/ml P=0.0004 and P=0.002, respectively). The Generic HIV Viral Load assay accurately quantified the majority of the non-B HIV-1 subtypes assessed in this study. Due to its low cost (approximately 10 US $/test), this assay performed with open real-time PCR instruments is now used routinely in the Kesho Bora trial and may be recommended in other African settings.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 04-2017
Publisher: American Society for Microbiology
Date: 10-2007
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00814-07
Abstract: Due to high cost, availability of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drug resistance testing in resource-poor settings is still limited. We therefore evaluated the usefulness of viral DNA extracted from either whole blood or dried blood spots (DBS). S les were collected from 50 patients receiving therapy and 10 therapy-naïve patients. Amplification and sequencing of RNA and DNA was performed using an in-house assay. Protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) sequences of plasma viral RNA were obtained for 96.6% and 89.7%, respectively, of the 29 patients with a detectable viral load. For cellular viral DNA, useful PR and RT sequences were obtained for 96.6% and 93.1% of the whole-blood-cell s les and for 93.1% and 93.1% of the DBS s les, respectively. For the 31 patients with an undetectable viral load, PR and RT sequences were obtained for 67.7% and 61.3% of the whole-blood-cell DNA preparations and for 54.8% and 58.1% of the DBS DNA preparations, respectively. A good correlation between RNA and DNA sequences was found most discordances were caused by the detection of mixed amino acids. Of the RT drug-resistant mutations, 13 (38.2%) were seen in RNA only, 6 (17.6%) in DNA only, and 15 (44.1%) in both. Repeated lification and sequencing of DNA extracts revealed a lack of reproducibility for the detection of drug resistance mutations in a number of s les, indicating a possible founder effect. In conclusion, this study shows the feasibility of genotypic drug resistance testing on whole blood cells or DBS and its possible usefulness for HIV-1 subtyping or examining the overall distribution of drug resistance in a population. For in idual patients, RNA sequencing was shown to be superior to DNA sequencing, especially for patients who experienced early treatment failure. The use of DNA extracted from whole blood or DBS for the detection of archived drug resistance mutations deserves further study.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 2023
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 12-2200
DOI: 10.1016/J.JVIROMET.2007.06.019
Abstract: There is an urgent need for low-cost assays for HIV-1 quantitation to ensure adequate follow-up of HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited countries. Two low-cost viral load assays are evaluated, a reverse transcriptase activity assay (ExavirLoad v2, Cavidi) and a real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay (Generic HIV viral load, Biocentric). Both tests were compared with the ultrasensitive HIV Amplicor Monitor assay. S les were collected in Mombasa, Kenya, from 20 HIV-1 seronegative and 150 HIV-1 seropositive in iduals of whom 50 received antiretroviral treatment (ART). The ExavirLoad and the Generic HIV viral load assay were performed in a local laboratory in Mombasa, the Amplicor Monitor assay (version 1.5, Roche Diagnostics) was performed in Ghent, Belgium. ExavirLoad and Generic HIV viral load reached a sensitivity of 98.3% and 100% and a specificity of 80.0% and 90.0%, respectively. Linear regression analyses revealed good correlations between the Amplicor Monitor and the Generic HIV viral load (r=0.935, p<0.001) with high accuracy (100.1%), good precision (5.5%) and a low percent similarity coefficient of variation (5.4%). Bland-Altman analysis found 95% of the s les within clinically acceptable limits of agreement (-1.19 to 0.87logcopies/ml). Although, the ExavirLoad also showed a good linear correlation with the Amplicor Monitor (r=0.901, p<0.001), a problem with false positive results was more significant. The cost per test remains relatively high (US$ 30 for ExavirLoad and US$ 20 for the Generic HIV viral load). Hence, false positive results and the need for an expensive PCR instrument for the Generic HIV viral load assays still limit the implementation of these tests in less equipped, less experienced laboratories.
No related grants have been discovered for Kim Steegen.