ORCID Profile
0000-0001-9795-3788
Current Organisations
Royal North Shore Hospital
,
University of Sydney
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 08-2001
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 11-2001
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 16-02-2006
DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2982.2005.00746.X
Abstract: In irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), it remains unclear whether rectal hypersensitivity is a 'marker' of colonic hypersensitivity. Our aim was to examine the relation between colonic and rectal sensitivity in IBS patients, comprising phasic and r distension techniques. Twenty IBS patients and 12 healthy subjects (N) underwent stepwise r and random phasic barostat distensions in the colon and rectum in random order. The sensory threshold pressure (r distension) and the visual analogue scale score (VAS, phasic distension), for pain and non-pain, were recorded. Colonic thresholds were lower, and VAS scores were generally higher, for pain and non-pain sensitivities in IBS compared to N. Rectal thresholds were lower, and VAS scores were higher, for pain but not for non-pain, in IBS compared to N. In IBS, for phasic distension, there was good correlation between the colon and rectum for non-pain (e.g. at 16 mmHg, r=0.59, P=0.006) and pain (r=0.60, P=0.006) sensitivities. In contrast, there was no significant correlation between the colon and rectum for r distension. In conclusion, colonic and rectal sensitivity in IBS are correlated in response to phasic but not r barostat distensions. The rectum serves as a legitimate 'window' for evaluating colonic hypersensitivity in IBS, provided that phasic distensions are employed.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 09-1998
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 06-04-2011
DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2036.2011.04653.X
Abstract: Anorectal biofeedback therapy (BFT) is a safe and effective treatment in patients with constipation. Given the high prevalence of constipation and therefore high demand for BFT, there is a need to prioritise patients. To explore clinical features and anorectal physiology which predict success or failure of BFT and to derive a statistical model which helps to predict the success of BFT. A total of 102 patients with constipation referred for BFT were evaluated. All patients underwent comprehensive clinical and anorectal function assessment, including balloon expulsion testing. The BFT protocol consisted of a comprehensive 6-weekly visit programme comprising instruction on toilet behaviour and abdominal breathing, achieving adequate rectal pressure and anal relaxation, and balloon expulsion and rectal sensory retraining. Success of BFT was based on an improvement in global bowel satisfaction. Harder stool consistency (P=0.009), greater willingness to participate (P<0.001), higher resting anal sphincter pressure (P=0.04) and prolonged balloon expulsion time (P=0.02) correlated with an improvement in bowel satisfaction score. A longer duration of laxative use (P=0.049) correlated with no improvement in bowel satisfaction score. Harder stools, shorter duration of laxative use, higher straining rectal pressure and prolonged balloon expulsion independently predicted successful BFT. A model (S(i) = (p)∑ β(j)X(ij), where β represents a regression coefficient, X is a given predictive variable and S(i) is the weighted index score for each in idual) incorporating these four variables enabled prediction of successful BFT, with sensitivity and specificity of 0.79 and 0.81, respectively. Important clinical and anorectal physiological features were found to be associated with outcome of anorectal biofeedback therapy in patients with constipation. This information and the predictive model will assist clinicians to prioritise patients for anorectal biofeedback therapy.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-1997
DOI: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)63571-4
Abstract: In the last years, the Covid-19 outbreak raised great awareness about ventilation system performance in confined spaces. Specifically, the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system design and operating parameters, such as air change per hour, air recirculation ratio, filtration device performance, and vents location, play a crucial role in reducing the spread of viruses, moulds, bacteria, and general pollutants. Concerning the transport sector, due to the impracticability of social distancing, and the relatively loose requirements of ventilation standards, the SARS-COV-19 outbreak brought a reduction of payload (up to 50%) for different carriers. Specifically, this has been particularly severe for the railway sector, where train coaches are typically characterized by relatively elevated occupancy and high recirculation ratios. In this framework, to improve the Indoor Air Quality and reduce the Covid-19 contagion risk in railway carriages, the present paper investigates the energy, economic and environmental feasibility of erse ventilation strategies. To do so, a novel dynamic simulation tool for the complete dynamic performance investigation of trains was developed in an OpenStudio environment. To assess the Covid-19 contagion risk connected to the investigated scenarios, the Wells-Riley model has been adopted. To prove the proposed approach's capabilities and show the Covid-19 infection risk reduction potentially achievable by varying the adopted ventilation strategies, a suitable case study related to an existing medium-distance train operating in South/Central Italy is presented. The conducted numerical simulations return interesting results providing also useful design criteria.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 27-02-2022
DOI: 10.1111/NMO.14335
Abstract: Anorectal manometry (ARM) comprehensively assesses anorectal sensorimotor functions. This review examines the indications, techniques, interpretation, strengths, and weaknesses of high‐resolution ARM (HR‐ARM), 3‐dimensional high‐resolution anorectal manometry (3D‐HR‐ARM), and portable ARM, and other assessments (i.e., rectal sensation and rectal balloon expulsion test) that are performed alongside manometry. It is based on a literature search of articles related to ARM in adults. HR‐ARM and 3D‐HR‐ARM are useful for diagnosing defecatory disorders (DD), to identify anorectal sensorimotor dysfunction and guide management in patients with fecal incontinence (FI), constipation, megacolon, and megarectum and to screen for anorectal structural (e.g., rectal intussusception) abnormalities. The rectal balloon expulsion test is a useful, low‐cost, radiation‐free, outpatient assessment tool for impaired evacuation that is performed and interpreted in conjunction with ARM. The anorectal function tests should be interpreted with reference to age‐ and sex‐matched normal values, clinical features, and results of other tests. A larger database of technique‐specific normal values and newer paradigms of analyzing anorectal pressure profiles will increase the precision and diagnostic utility of HR‐ARM for identifying abnormal mechanisms of defecation and continence.
Publisher: American Physiological Society
Date: 06-2009
Abstract: The role of the central nervous system in enteroenteric motor reflexes remains controversial. Our aims were as follows: 1) to evaluate colorectal, rectocolic, gastrocolonic, and gastrorectal reflex responses in patients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) and 2) to compare these responses with those in healthy subjects. In six patients with SCI (5 male, 42 ± 4 yr) and six healthy control subjects (5 male, 36 ± 5 yr), 2-min phasic distensions were performed randomly via dual-barostat balloons in the colon and rectum. Continuous colonic and rectal balloon volumes were recorded during distensions and after a 1,000-kcal liquid meal. Mean balloon volumes were recorded before, during, and after phasic distensions and over 60 min postprandially. The colorectal response was similar in control subjects and SCI patients (rectal volume reduction = 28 ± 11% and 15 ± 5% in SCI patients and healthy subjects, respectively) the rectocolic response was variable. The gastrocolonic response was present in all subjects (colonic volume reduction = 49 ± 4% and 44 ± 3% in SCI patients and healthy subjects, respectively), with a time effect in the first 30 min ( P 0.0001) and a group effect in the second 30 min ( P 0.004). The gastrorectal response was present in four SCI patients and five healthy subjects (rectal volume reduction = 38 ± 4% and 41 ± 3% in SCI patients and healthy subjects, respectively), with a time effect in the first 30 min ( P 0.0001) but no group effect in the second 30 min. Intact neural transmission between the spinal cord and higher centers is not essential for normal colorectal motor responses to feeding and distension however, a degree of central nervous system and neurohormonal modulation of these responses is likely.
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 08-2005
DOI: 10.1007/S10350-005-0061-5
Abstract: Previous surveys of gastrointestinal symptoms after spinal cord injury have not used validated questionnaires and have not focused on the full spectrum of such symptoms and their relationship to factors, such as level of spinal cord injury and psychologic dysfunction. This study was designed to detail the spectrum and prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in spinal cord injury and to determine clinical and psychologic factors associated with such symptoms. Established spinal cord injury patients (>12 months) randomly selected from a spinal cord injury database completed the following three questionnaires: 1) Rome II Integrative Questionnaire, 2) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and 3) Burwood Bowel Dysfunction after spinal cord injury. A total of 110 patients participated. The prevalence of abdominal bloating and constipation were 22 and 46 percent, respectively. Bloating was associated with cervical (odds ratio = 9.5) and lumbar (odds ratio = 12.1) level but not with thoracic level of injury. Constipation was associated with a higher level of injury (cervical odds ratio = 5.6 vs. lumbar) but not with psychologic factors. In contrast, abdominal pain (33 percent) and fecal incontinence (41 percent) were associated with higher levels of anxiety (odds ratio = 6.8, and odds ratio = 2.4) but not with the level of injury. There is a high prevalence and wide spectrum of gastrointestinal symptoms in spinal cord injury. Abdominal bloating and constipation are primarily related to specific spinal cord levels of injury, whereas abdominal pain and fecal incontinence are primarily associated with higher levels of anxiety. Based on our findings, further physiologic and psychologic research studies in spinal cord injury patients should lead to more rational management strategies for the common gastrointestinal symptoms in spinal cord injury.
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 03-2000
DOI: 10.1097/00001574-200003000-00008
Abstract: During the period of review, work has been ongoing to refine existing techniques and to better define normal patterns of small intestinal motility. Researchers continue to learn more about the established neurohumoral control mechanisms of motility, as well as the effects and potential importance of newly discovered neuropeptides and receptors. There has also been continued interest in alterations in motility in various disease states and in the effects on motility of a number of pharmacologic agents.
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 03-1996
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 06-2000
DOI: 10.1046/J.1365-2036.2000.00757.X
Abstract: Visceral sensation and motility are important in functional gut disorders and are partly controlled by adrenergic innervation. To characterize the alpha2-adrenergic control of motor and sensory function of descending colon and rectum. In 32 healthy volunteers, we assessed compliance, fasting and postprandial tone, and sensations of gas, urgency and pain during phasic distentions. Each subject received one agent at clinically approved doses: clonidine (0.05, 0.1, 0.2 or 0.3 mg p.o. ) or the alpha2 antagonist yohimbine (0.0125 mg, 0.05 mg, 0.125 mg or 0.2 mg intravenously and infusion over 2.5 h). Clonidine increased colonic and rectal compliance, and reduced tone, pain, gas sensation and rectal urgency. Clonidine showed large pairwise differences in sensation and motility between 0.05 and 0.1 mg doses, which did not interfere with the colon's motor response to feeding. Conversely, yohimbine dose-dependently altered the compliance curve, increased tone and sensations of gas, pain and urgency. Drug effects in the colon were more marked at low distensions alpha2 modulation of rectal sensation was observed at all levels of distension. alpha2-adrenergic mechanisms modulate colorectal sensations and motility at doses as low as 0.05 mg, clonidine reduced colorectal sensation while the tone response to feeding was preserved. These studies provide insight into the potential use of alpha2 agents in disease states.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 11-2015
DOI: 10.1016/J.CGH.2015.06.022
Abstract: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common chronic functional bowel disorder, with few treatment options. IBS affects 10%-20% of the population as many as 58% of patients have constipation-predominant IBS (IBS-C). We evaluated efficacy and safety of a standardized, specifically formulated Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) preparation in treatment of patients with IBS-C. We performed a double-blind trial of 125 patients with IBS-C (according to Rome III criteria), who were recruited from 13 medical centers or clinics in Australia from July 2009 through February 2012. Patients were randomly assigned to groups given a standardized extract of 7 selected CHM ingredients (n = 61) or placebo (controls, n = 64) for 8 weeks (5 capsules, twice daily). Subjects were then followed for 16 weeks. Chemical definition, standardization, and stability testing of the formulation were completed. Subjects completed a self-administered, validated binary questionnaire of global symptom improvement at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 16 (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included results from the self-administered IBS Symptom Severity Scale and the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), which were completed at weeks 4, 8, and 16. There was statistically and clinically significant (per protocol analyses) improvement among subjects who received CHM (n = 50) vs controls (n = 58) for 8 weeks. A greater proportion of subjects receiving CHM reported adequate relief (P = .010). Compared with controls, the CHM group had improved bowel habits vs controls at week 8, including lower IBS Symptom Severity Scale scores (P < .001), reduced straining during defecation (P = .002), and a significant decrease in hard lumpy stools (P = .031). The CHM group also had increased stool consistency, which was based on the Bristol Stool Form Scale (week 8, P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in abdominal pain at week 8 (P = .692). The CHM was well-tolerated. In a prospective, controlled study, CHM reduced symptoms of IBS-C, increased bowel satisfaction and stool consistency, and reduced straining and hard lumpy stools, compared with placebo. Clinical trial registration no: ACTRN12609000558224.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 30-06-2021
DOI: 10.1111/NMO.14209
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 03-1997
Publisher: American Physiological Society
Date: 12-2001
DOI: 10.1152/AJPGI.2001.281.6.G1468
Abstract: To characterize α 2 -adrenergic control of motor and sensory functions of gastrointestinal tract and colon, we studied dose-related effects of clonidine (placebo or up to 0.3 mg po) by random assignment in 55 healthy humans. Gastrointestinal transit was measured in all subjects in 35, we assessed colonic compliance, tone, and sensations of gas and pain during phasic distensions. Clonidine did not significantly alter gastrointestinal or colonic transit, but it increased colonic compliance and reduced fasting tone without altering colonic response to a meal. Clonidine significantly reduced aggregate sensation to distensions overall and had significant linear dose-related sensory effects at 8- and 24-mmHg distensions. Effect on pain (including dose-response relationship) was due to 0.3-mg dose for distensions at 24 mmHg. We confirmed that clonidine relaxes fasting colonic tone and reduces sensation of pain. In this study, gut transit was not altered by clonidine, and novel dose-response characteristics and clonidine's effect on gas sensation are provided. Doses as low as 0.05 mg may be effective and potentially useful in reducing colonic tone and gas sensation.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 08-2005
DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2982.2005.00651.X
Abstract: There are conflicting recommendations from consensus groups with regard to the assessment of resting anal sphincter pressure. Our aims were to evaluate and compare the performance of three recognized techniques for the clinical measurement of resting anal sphincter pressure. In each of 54 patients presenting for anorectal manometry, and suffering from constipation or fecal incontinence, three different techniques for assessment of resting anal pressure were undertaken, namely stationary, stationary pull-through and slow pull-through techniques. Resting anal sphincter pressures were compared between groups and between techniques. Mean resting anal sphincter pressure was lower with stationary, compared with stationary pull-through and slow pull-through, techniques (P < or = 0.002). Resting pressure was higher for constipation than incontinence regardless of technique used (P < 0.00001). The techniques were highly correlated with each other (P < 0.0001). The stationary pull-through technique conferred a minor advantage in the discrimination between constipation and incontinence. The stationary technique required significantly less time for completion (P < 0.0001). Resting anal sphincter pressure varies according to the specific technique employed, yet each technique is valid. The stationary pull-through technique confers a minor advantage in clinical discrimination of patients, but the stationary technique is more time-efficient. Standardized anal sphincter testing should be established to enable inter-laboratory comparisons.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 12-08-2019
DOI: 10.1111/NMO.13679
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 20-09-2017
DOI: 10.1111/NMO.12940
Abstract: A subset of patients with chronic constipation display a relatively high manometric rectal pressure on strain. We hypothesized that these patients represent a unique phenotype of functional defecatory disorder (FDD) and would benefit from undergoing anorectal biofeedback (BF). Of 138 consecutive patients with chronic constipation and symptoms of FDD, 19 were defined as having a high rectal pressure on strain, using a statistically derived cut-off of 78 mm Hg. This subset was compared with remaining patients in regard to baseline clinical profile and physiology, and outcome of BF. There was a greater representation of males in the high rectal pressure group. Their constipation score, impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life and satisfaction with bowel habits did not differ from the remaining patients. Eighty-four percent of patients in the high group successfully expelled the rectal balloon and 95% displayed paradoxical anal contraction on strain (P<.05 compared with the remaining patients). Following BF, 89% of patients in the high group reduced their rectal pressure to normal. End of BF treatment outcomes improved significantly, and to a similar degree, in both groups. We have identified a subgroup of patients with dyssynergic symptoms but without a formal Rome III diagnosis of FDD, who were characterized by a high straining rectal pressure. Although these patients displayed some physiological differences to the patients with lower straining rectal pressure, they suffer similarly. Importantly, we have shown that these patients can respond favorably to anorectal BF.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 28-12-2023
DOI: 10.1111/NMO.14524
Abstract: Recent community‐based studies have demonstrated that experiencing multiple concurrent functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) is associated with increased somatization, worse quality of life (QoL), and greater health care utilization. However, the presence of multiple overlapping FGIDs is unstudied specifically in chronic constipation and functional defecation disorders (FDD). We investigated the prevalence and impact of additional nonconstipation FGIDs on constipation severity, anorectal physiology, anxiety and depression, and QoL, in patients with chronic constipation and FDD. One‐hundred and forty‐six consecutive patients with functional constipation or irritable bowel syndrome (IBS‐C/IBS‐M) presenting to a tertiary referral Neurogastroenterology Clinic were studied. In addition, 90/146 (62%) qualified for FDD due to abnormal defecatory physiology. Patients underwent comprehensive baseline assessment comprising anorectal physiology, Bristol Stool Chart, Rome questionnaire, Knowles‐Eccersley‐Scott‐Symptom (KESS) constipation score, Hospital Anxiety, and Depression Scale, and modified 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) for QoL. Additional FGIDs were diagnosed using Rome III criteria. Additional nonconstipation FGIDs occurred in 85% of patients, with a mean of 2.1 (SD 1.6) additional FGIDs. Patients with four or more additional FGIDs experienced greater constipation severity compared to those with no additional FGIDs ( p = 0.004). Comorbid FGIDs were associated with worse SF‐36 scores for physical functioning ( p 0.001), role‐physical ( p = 0.005), bodily pain ( p 0.001), vitality ( p = 0.008), social functioning ( p = 0.004), and mental health index ( p = 0.031). Functional gastrointestinal disorders comorbidity is highly prevalent in chronic constipation and defecatory disorders, and this is associated with greater symptom severity and worse QoL. Multimodal treatments targeting comorbid FGIDs may lead to superior outcomes.
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 05-10-2021
DOI: 10.14309/AJG.0000000000001526
Abstract: Rectal perception testing is a recommended component of anorectal physiology testing. Although recent consensus (London) guidelines suggested criteria for categorizing hyporectal and hyper-rectal sensitivity, these were based on scant evidence. Moreover, data regarding diagnostic capabilities and clinical utility of rectal perception testing are lacking. The aims of this study were to determine the association between rectal perception testing and both clinical and physiological variables to enhance the analysis and interpretation of real-life test results. Prospectively documented data from 1,618 (92% female) patients referred for anorectal physiology testing were analyzed for 3 rectal perception thresholds (first, urge, and maximal tolerated). Normal values derived from healthy female subjects were used to categorize each threshold into hyposensitive and hypersensitive to examine the clinical relevance of this categorization. There was poor to moderate agreement between the 3 thresholds. Older age, male sex, and constipation were associated with higher perception thresholds, whereas irritable bowel syndrome, fecal incontinence, connective tissue disease, and pelvic radiation were associated with lower perception thresholds to some, but not all, thresholds ( P 0.01 on multivariate analysis for all). The clinical utility and limitations of categorizing thresholds into “hypersensitivity” and “hyposensitivity” were determined. Commonly practiced rectal perception testing is correlated with several disease states and thus has clinical relevance. However, most disease states were correlated with 2 or even only 1 abnormal threshold, and agreement between thresholds was limited. This may suggest each threshold measures different pathophysiological pathways. We suggest all 3 thresholds be measured and reported separately in routine clinical testing.
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 04-2010
DOI: 10.1038/AJG.2010.54
Abstract: Abdominal bloating and distension are common in patients with constipation. The precise mechanism of abdominal distension remains uncertain. We hypothesized that constipated patients with bloating plus distension exhibit a greater degree of anorectal dysfunction, potentially affecting gas evacuation, than those without distension. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate anorectal function and other clinical features in patients with constipation who exhibit bloating with and without distension. In all, 88 female patients with abdominal bloating and either non-diarrhea irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or functional constipation were included in the study. The presence or absence of abdominal distension was assessed according to the Rome II questionnaire, and all patients underwent comprehensive clinical assessment and anorectal function studies. Patients were ided into two groups: abdominal bloating with distension (D n=53) and abdominal bloating without distension (ND n=35). D featured a prolonged balloon expulsion time (P=0.005), a higher resting anal sphincter pressure (P=0.002), and a higher maximum anal sphincter squeeze pressure (P=0.015) than ND. They also experienced more bloating (P<0.001), more abdominal pain (P=0.004), harder stools (P=0.01), and more incomplete emptying (P=0.005). In logistic regression modeling, prolonged balloon expulsion time was a significant predictor of abdominal distension (P=0.018). This is the first study to show that prolonged balloon expulsion time predicts abdominal distension in patients with bloating and constipation. Hence, ineffective evacuation of gas and stool associated with prolonged balloon expulsion may be an important mechanism underlying abdominal distension.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 31-01-2019
DOI: 10.1111/NMO.13552
Abstract: Anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET) are pivotal in investigation of anorectal disorders. There is controversy, however, about normal values and optimum methodology for performing these tests. Our aims were to compare BET using three different balloons and to establish normal values for ARM and BET in health. Forty-four female healthy subjects (mean age 56 ± 12 years) underwent ARM, followed by BET which was performed in a private toilet using three different catheters (party balloon, Foley catheter and a commercially available catheter) in a single-blinded randomized order. Outcome measures were time to balloon expulsion and comprehensive measures of anal sphincter function, the push maneuver and rectal sensation. The Foley catheter took longer to expel compared to both party and commercial balloons (both pairwise P < 0.001) with a wider distribution of results (P < 0.001). Ten of 40 healthy subjects could not expel the Foley catheter within 120 seconds. On ARM, older age was associated with lower resting anal sphincter pressure (ρ = -0.3, P = 0.05) and lower anal squeeze pressure (ρ = -0.3, P = 0.05). Having at least one vaginal delivery (compared to none) was associated with lower anal squeeze pressures (P = 0.03) and a smaller difference between cough and squeeze pressures (P = 0.03). A commercial balloon exhibited superior results in vivo compared to the Foley catheter without the concerns of latex allergy and quality control present with the use of a party balloon. Normal values for high-resolution water-perfused manometry have been established and an effect seen for age and parity.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 10-06-2019
DOI: 10.1111/NMO.13590
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 17-05-2016
DOI: 10.1038/SC.2016.67
Abstract: A case-control study of prospectively collected data was performed. To compare anorectal biofeedback (BF) outcomes in patients with incomplete motor spinal cord injury (SCI) and neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) with a group of functional anorectal disorder-matched control patients. Neurogastroenterology Unit affiliated with a Spinal Injury Unit in a tertiary referral centre in Sydney, Australia. All consecutive patients with SCI and NBD referred for anorectal manometry and BF were matched in a 1:2 ratio with age, gender, parity and functional anorectal disorder-matched control patients. Instrumented BF was performed in six nurse-guided weekly visits. Outcomes included changes in anorectal physiology measures, symptom scores and quality-of-life measures. Twenty-one patients were included. These were matched with 42 patient controls. Following BF, symptom scores improved significantly in both groups, as did effect of bowel disorder on quality of life. Improvement in these measures did not differ between the groups. Patients with SCI and NBD showed improvement in their sensory and motor anorectal function, including lowering of first sensation threshold and more effective balloon expulsion. Patients with incomplete motor SCI responded as well to anorectal BF as functional anorectal disorder-matched controls. Spinal cord-injured patients also showed improvement in anorectal sensorimotor dysfunction and balloon expulsion. These novel findings indicate that clinicians should not be dissuaded from considering behaviour-based therapeutic interventions such as anorectal BF in selected spinal cord-injured patients.
Publisher: American Physiological Society
Date: 06-2012
Abstract: The rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) is important in gas and stool evacuation. We examined RAIR features in patients with chronic constipation who exhibited bloating with and without abdominal distension, to determine whether alterations in RAIR may be a factor in the pathogenesis of abdominal distension. Seventy-five female patients with chronic constipation with or without abdominal distension were included in the study. The presence or absence of abdominal distension was assessed according to the Rome II questionnaire. All patients underwent both RAIR and rectal sensitivity testing, and specific RAIR parameters were analyzed. Patients were ided into two groups: abdominal bloating with distension (D, n = 55) and abdominal bloating without distension (ND, n = 20). D had a longer time to the onset of anal sphincter inhibition (latency of inhibition) ( P = 0.03) compared with ND. In logistic regression analysis, a combination of age, latency of inhibition and the time measured from onset of inhibition to the point of maximum inhibition predicted abdominal distension ( P = 0.002). There were no differences between groups for the time from point of maximum inhibition to recovery and for the percentage of internal anal sphincter relaxation. This is the first study to examine the role of RAIR in patients with abdominal distension. Female patients with constipation and abdominal distension exhibited differences in the temporal characteristics of, but not in the degree of, anal sphincter relaxation compared with patients without distension. Since this study was uncontrolled, further studies are necessary to determine the contribution of altered anorectal reflexes to abdominal distension.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 08-03-2010
DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2982.2010.01503.X
Abstract: Pelvic floor dyssynergia (PFD) within irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is often overlooked and the relationship between symptoms and physiology is relatively unexplored. Our aims were to determine relationships between clinical features and anorectal function in non-diarrhea predominant IBS (non-D IBS) patients and whether certain clinical or physiological features predict PFD in IBS. Two groups of patients were evaluated. Group I: 32 female non-D IBS patients with >or=2 symptoms suggesting PFD underwent comprehensive symptom and anorectal function assessment. Group II: 32 female non-D IBS patients recruited from the community underwent symptom assessment. Prevalence of PFD symptoms was similar in both groups. In group I patients, increased frequency of digitation was associated with a longer balloon expulsion time (P = 0.03). Higher scores for anal pain were associated with both a low resting anal pressure (P = 0.04) and a shorter duration of maximum squeeze (P = 0.03). Reduced perineal descent was associated with anxiety (P = 0.03) and depression (P = 0.01). A shorter duration of maximum squeeze was associated with higher parity (P = 0.02) and previous hysterectomy (P = 0.047). Duration of PFD symptoms was higher (P = 0.02) and maximum tolerated volume was lower (P = 0.05) in 22 patients with a physiological diagnosis of PFD compared to 10 without PFD. No symptoms independently predicted a physiological diagnosis of PFD. Important relationships between certain PFD symptoms and disordered anorectal physiology have been demonstrated in these non-D IBS patients. However, symptoms alone could not predict PFD, and certain clinical features should therefore highlight the need for comprehensive anorectal function tests.
Publisher: American Physiological Society
Date: 2017
Abstract: Fecal incontinence (FI) in men is common, yet data on sex differences in clinical features, physiology, and treatment are scarce. Our aim was to provide insights into FI in males compared with females. Prospectively collected data from 73 men and 596 women with FI in a tertiary referral center were analyzed. Anorectal physiology, clinical characteristics, and outcome of instrumented biofeedback (BF) were recorded. Thirty-one men with FI proceeded to BF and were matched with 62 age-matched women with FI who underwent BF. Men with FI had higher resting, squeeze, and cough anal sphincter pressures ( P 0.001) and were more able to hold a sustained squeeze compared with women ( P = 0.04). Men with FI had higher rectal pressure and less inadequate rectal pressure on strain and higher sensory thresholds ( P 0.05). Men, but not women, with isolated soiling had higher anal resting and squeeze pressures compared with those with overt FI ( P 0.05). Men were less likely to undergo BF when offered compared with women. Baseline symptom severity did not differ between the groups. In men, the absence of an organic cause for the FI and the presence of overt FI, but not isolated soiling, were correlated with improvement in patient satisfaction following BF. The outcomes of 50% reduction in FI episodes, physician assessment, symptoms, and quality of life scores after BF all significantly improved in men similarly to women. We conclude that men, compared with women, with FI have unique clinical features and physiology and are less likely to have investigations and treatment despite successful outcome with BF. Future studies to customize treatment in males and determine barriers to therapy are warranted. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Fecal incontinence in men is common, yet data on sex differences in clinical features, physiology, and treatment are scarce. We provide evidence that men, compared with women, with fecal incontinence have unique clinical features and physiology and are less likely to have investigations and treatment despite successful outcome with anorectal biofeedback therapy.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 10-1999
DOI: 10.5694/J.1326-5377.1999.TB123722.X
Abstract: Angioedema usually presents as episodic attacks of swelling of the face, airway and extremities, but it may also involve visceral tissues. A 58-year-old woman with repeated episodes of abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting had two laparotomies and was treated for Crohn's disease for two years before a diagnosis of acquired intestinal angioedema was made. This case provides important insights into the presentation of intestinal angioedema.
Publisher: American Physiological Society
Date: 09-2005
Abstract: Alterations in normal intestinointestinal reflexes may be important contributors to the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Our aims were to compare the rectal tonic responses to colonic distension in female IBS patients with predominant constipation (IBS-C) and with predominant diarrhea (IBS-D) to those in healthy females, both fasting and postprandially. Using a dual barostat assembly, 2-min colonic phasic distensions were performed during fasting and postprandially. Rectal tone was recorded before, during, and after the phasic distension. Colonic compliance and colonic sensitivity in response to the distension were also evaluated fasting and postprandially. Eight IBS-C patients, 8 IBS-D patients, and 8 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects ( group N) participated. The fasting increments in rectal tone in response to colonic distension in both IBS-C (rectal balloon volume change −4.6 ± 6.1 ml) and IBS-D (−7.9 ± 4.9 ml) were significantly reduced compared with group N (−34 ± 9.7 ml, P = 0.01). Similar findings were observed postprandially ( P = 0.02). When adjusted for the colonic compliance of in idual subjects, the degree of attenuation in the rectal tonic response in IBS compared with group N was maintained (fasting P = 0.007 postprandial P = 0.03). When adjusted for colonic sensitivity there was a trend for the attenuation in the rectal tonic response in IBS patients compared with group N to be maintained (fasting P = 0.07, postprandial P = 0.08). IBS patients display a definite attenuation of the normal increase in rectal tone in response to colonic distension (colorectal reflex), fasting and postprandially. Alterations in colonic compliance and sensitivity in IBS are not likely to contribute to such attenuation.
Publisher: American Physiological Society
Date: 11-2004
Abstract: Tonic reflexes in the colon and rectum are likely to be important in health and in disorders of gastrointestinal function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the fasting and postprandial “colorectal” and “rectocolic” reflexes in response to 2-min isobaric distensions of the colon and rectum, accounting for enteric sensation, compliance, and distending balloon volume. In 14 healthy fasting subjects, a dual barostat assembly was positioned (descending colon and rectum). A 2-min phasic distension was performed in the colon and rectum in random order while the opposing balloon volume was recorded. Sensation (phasic distension) and compliance (r distension) were also determined. The experiment was repeated postprandially. Colonic distension resulted in significant rectal tonic contraction in the fasting (rectal volume change: −35.4 ± 8.4 ml, P 0.01) and postprandial (−22.2 ± 8.4 ml, P 0.01) states. After adjustment for colonic sensitivity, for compliance, and for distending balloon volume, the rectal volume change remained significant the extent of the tonic response, however, correlated significantly with increasing pain score ( P 0.01). In contrast, rectal distension did not produce a significant tonic response in the colon (fasting: −6.5 ± 7.3 ml postprandial: 2.7 ± 7.3 ml), either unadjusted or adjusted for rectal sensitivity, compliance, and distending balloon volume. In conclusion, the colorectal reflex, but not the rectocolic reflex, can be readily demonstrated both before and after a meal in response to a 2-min isobaric distension in the colon and rectum, respectively. Although the presence of the colorectal reflex does not depend on colonic sensitivity or the volume of the distending colonic balloon, these factors modulate the reflex, especially in the fasting state.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 04-2022
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 06-2018
DOI: 10.1111/NMO.13389
Abstract: Long-term outcome data for anorectal biofeedback (BF) for fecal incontinence (FI) is scarce. Our aims were to describe the long-term symptom profile, quality of life, and need for surgery in FI patients following BF. One hundred and eight consecutive female patients with FI who completed an instrumented BF course were identified for long-term follow-up. In 61 of 89 contactable patients, outcome measures were assessed at short-term (end of BF), mid-term (9 months median), and long-term (7 years median) follow-up after treatment. Long-term response rate (50% or more reduction in FI episodes/wk compared to before BF and not requiring surgical intervention) was seen in 33/61 (54%) patients. Thirteen of these had complete continence. Improvement was seen at short, mid, and long-term follow-up for patients' satisfaction and control of bowel function. In contrast, fecal incontinence severity index and quality of life measures, which improved in short and mid-term, were no different from baseline by long-term follow-up. Patients classified as short-term responders were far more likely to display a long-term response compared to short-term non-responders (68% vs 18%, P < .001). Long-term symptom improvement was observed in more than half of FI patients at 7 year post BF follow-up. Quality of life improvements, however, were not maintained. Patients improving during the initial BF program have a high chance of long-term improvement, while patients who do not respond to BF should be considered early for other therapies.
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 22-03-2022
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 10-04-2023
DOI: 10.1111/NMO.14592
Abstract: Patients with obstructed defecatory symptoms (ODS) are commonly referred to either gastroenterologists (GE) or colorectal surgeons (CS). Further management of these patients may be impacted by this choice of referral. An online survey of specialist practice was disseminated to GE and CS in Australia and New Zealand. A case vignette of a patient presenting with ODS was described, with multiple subsequent scenarios designed to delineate the responder's preferred approach to management of this patient. A total of 107 responders participated in the study, 62 CS and 45 GE. For a female patient with ODS not responding to pharmacological treatment, GE were more likely than CS to refer patients for anorectal manometry, while CS were more likely to refer for dynamic imaging. A quarter of CS and GE referred patients directly to pelvic floor physiotherapy, without any pre‐treatment testing. Knowing the result of dynamic imaging, especially if a rectocele was demonstrated, substantially influenced management for both of the specialties: GE became more likely to refer the patients for CS consultation and less likely to refer directly for biofeedback or physiotherapy and CS were more likely to opt for an operative pathway over conservative management than they were prior to knowledge of the imaging findings. The majority ( %) of GE and CS did not find it necessary to obtain a gynecological consultation, even in the presence of a rectocele. Practice variation across medical specialties affects diagnostic and management recommendations for patients with ODS, impacting treatment pathways. Our findings provide an incentive toward establishing interdisciplinary, uniform, management guidelines.
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 24-03-2023
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002422
Abstract: Incontinence to gas can be a troublesome symptom impacting quality of life for patients even in the absence of fecal incontinence. Whether isolated flatus incontinence represents part of the spectrum of true fecal incontinence or a separate condition with a different pathophysiology remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical features and anorectal physiology in women presenting with severe isolated flatus incontinence compared to women with fecal incontinence and healthy asymptomatic women. This was a retrospective case-control study of prospectively collected data. Data from participants were obtained from a single tertiary Neurogastroenterology Unit in Sydney, Australia. Data from 34 patients with severe isolated flatus incontinence, 127 women with fecal incontinence‚ and 44 healthy women were analyzed. The primary outcomes were clinical (including demographic, obstetric, and symptom variables) and physiological differences across the 3 groups. Patients with flatus incontinence were significantly younger (mean 39 versus 63 years p = 0.0001), had a shorter history of experiencing their symptoms ( p = 0.0001), and had harder stool form than patients with fecal incontinence ( p = 0.02). Those with flatus incontinence had an adverse obstetric history and impaired anorectal physiology (motor and sensory, specifically rectal hypersensitivity) but to a lesser extent than patients with fecal incontinence. This study was limited by its retrospective design and modest s le size. Anorectal physiology was impaired in patients with flatus incontinence compared to healthy controls, but to a lesser extent than in those with fecal incontinence, raising the possibility that flatus incontinence could be a precursor to fecal incontinence. As clinical and physiological findings are different from healthy controls (including the presence of visceral hypersensitivity), isolated flatus incontinence should be considered a distinct clinical entity (like other functional GI disorders), or possibly part of an incontinence spectrum rather than purely a normal phenomenon. See Video Abstract at links.lww.com/DCR/B946. ANTECEDENTES: La incontinencia de gases puede ser un síntoma molesto que afecta la calidad de vida de los pacientes incluso en ausencia de incontinencia fecal. Aún no está claro si la incontinencia de flatos aislada representa parte del espectro de la incontinencia fecal verdadera o una condición separada con una fisiopatología poco clara. OBJETIVO: Evaluar las características clínicas y la fisiología anorrectal en mujeres que presentan incontinencia grave aislada de flatos, en comparación con la incontinencia fecal y mujeres sanas asintomáticas. DISEÑO: Este fue un estudio retrospectivo de casos y controles de datos recolectados prospectivamente. AJUSTE: Los datos de los participantes se obtuvieron de una sola Unidad de Neurogastroenterología terciaria en Sydney, Australia. PACIENTES: Se analizaron los datos de 34 pacientes con incontinencia grave aislada de flatos, junto con 127 mujeres con incontinencia fecal y 44 mujeres sanas. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Los resultados primarios fueron clínicos (incluidas las variables demográficas, obstétricas y de síntomas), así como las diferencias fisiológicas entre los tres grupos. RESULTADOS: Los pacientes con incontinencia de flatos eran significativamente más jóvenes (media de 39 años frente a 63 años, p = 0,0001), tenían un historial más corto de experimentar sus síntomas (p = 0,0001) y tenían heces más duras que los pacientes con incontinencia fecal (p = 0,02). Aquellos con incontinencia de flatos tenían antecedentes obstétricos adversos y fisiología anorrectal alterada (motora y sensorial, específicamente hipersensibilidad rectal) aunque en menor medida que las pacientes con incontinencia fecal. LIMITACIONES: Este estudio estuvo limitado por su diseño retrospectivo y tamaño de muestra modesto. CONCLUSIONES: La fisiología anorrectal se vio afectada en las pacientes con incontinencia de flatos en comparación con las controles sanos, pero en menor medida que en aquellas con incontinencia fecal, lo que plantea la posibilidad de que la incontinencia de flatos pueda ser un precursor de la incontinencia fecal. Dado que los hallazgos clínicos y fisiológicos son diferentes a los de los controles sanos (incluida la presencia de hipersensibilidad visceral), la incontinencia de flatos aislada debe considerarse como una entidad clínica distinta (al igual que otros trastornos gastrointestinales funcionales), o posiblemente como parte de un espectro de incontinencia en lugar de un trastorno puramente a un fenómeno normal. Consulte Video Resumen en links.lww.com/DCR/B946. (Traducción—Dr Yolanda Colorado )
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 10-2021
DOI: 10.14309/AJG.0000000000001507
Abstract: Benign anorectal disorders of structure and function are common in clinical practice. These guidelines summarize the preferred approach to the evaluation and management of defecation disorders, proctalgia syndromes, hemorrhoids, anal fissures, and fecal incontinence in adults and represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. The scientific evidence for these guidelines was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation process. When the evidence was not appropriate for Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, we used expert consensus to develop key concept statements. These guidelines should be considered as preferred but are not the only approaches to these conditions.
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 02-2010
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 2007
DOI: 10.1080/00365520600965749
Abstract: Alterations in autonomic balance, detectable by heart rate variability (HRV) analysis, have been shown to occur after a meal in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). There are few data on changes in sympathovagal responses in IBS to other forms of enteric stimulation such as colonic distension. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of colonic balloon distension on HRV in the fasting and the postprandial state in healthy subjects and in IBS patients. Eight IBS patients and 8 age- and gender-matched healthy subjects underwent unsedated descending colonic distension before and after a 1000 kcal liquid meal. Low- (LF) and high-frequency (HF) HRV band values obtained from 2-min ECG segments recorded before and during distension were compared between groups, and between fasting and postprandial states. A visual analogue scale was used to determine sensation during colonic distension. HF values decreased significantly with feeding in IBS patients (p=0.01), but not in healthy subjects. The low-to-high frequency (LF/HF) ratio was significantly higher postprandially in IBS patients (p=0.02) and, additionally, was decreased (p<0.01) with colonic distension in the fed state, independently of colonic sensitivity or distending volume. Moreover, changes in the LF/HF ratio with distension in the fed versus the fasting state were negatively correlated in IBS patients but positively correlated in healthy subjects (both p<0.05). IBS patients demonstrated altered autonomic responses to feeding and colonic distension. Further studies should determine whether these alterations could explain the postprandial exacerbation of symptoms in IBS.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 10-08-2022
DOI: 10.1038/S41572-022-00381-7
Abstract: Faecal incontinence, which is defined by the unintentional loss of solid or liquid stool, has a worldwide prevalence of ≤7% in community-dwelling adults and can markedly impair quality of life. Nonetheless, many patients might not volunteer the symptom owing to embarrassment. Bowel disturbances, particularly diarrhoea, anal sphincter trauma (obstetrical injury or previous surgery), rectal urgency and burden of chronic illness are the main risk factors for faecal incontinence others include neurological disorders, inflammatory bowel disease and pelvic floor anatomical disturbances. Faecal incontinence is classified by its type (urge, passive or combined), aetiology (anorectal disturbance, bowel symptoms or both) and severity, which is derived from the frequency, volume, consistency and nature (urge or passive) of stool leakage. Guided by the clinical features, diagnostic tests and therapies are implemented stepwise. When simple measures (for ex le, bowel modifiers such as fibre supplements, laxatives and anti-diarrhoeal agents) fail, anorectal manometry and other tests (endoanal imaging, defecography, rectal compliance and sensation, and anal neurophysiological tests) are performed as necessary. Non-surgical options (diet and lifestyle modification, behavioural measures, including biofeedback therapy, pharmacotherapy for constipation or diarrhoea, and anal or vaginal barrier devices) are often effective, especially in patients with mild faecal incontinence. Thereafter, perianal bulking agents, sacral neuromodulation and other surgeries may be considered when necessary.
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 03-2002
DOI: 10.1097/00001574-200203000-00006
Abstract: The publications relevant to small bowel motility have been concentrated during the past year in several main areas: further characterization of normal patterns of small bowel motor activity and transit, physiologic control mechanisms, visceral hypersensitivity, inflammation and motility, disease processes and dysmotility, and novel pharmacologic approaches to altered sensorimotor activity.
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 18-01-2017
DOI: 10.1111/NMO.13016
Abstract: Ano-rectal manometry (ARM) is the most commonly performed investigation for assessment of anorectal dysfunction. Its use is supported by expert consensus documents and international guidelines. Variation in technology, data acquisition, and analysis affect results and clinical interpretation. This study examined variation in ARM between institutions to establish the status of current practice. A 50-item web-based questionnaire assessing analysis and interpretation of ARM was distributed by the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group via societies representing practitioners that perform ARM. Study methodology and performance characteristics between institutions were compared. One hundred and seven complete responses were included from 30 countries. Seventy-nine (74%) institutions performed at least two studies per week. Forty-nine centers (47%) applied conventional ARM (≤8 pressure sensors) and 57 (53%) high-resolution ARM (HR-ARM). Specialist centers were most likely to use HR-ARM compared to regional hospitals and office-based practice (63% vs 37%). Most conventional ARM systems used water-perfused technology (34/49) solid-state hardware was more frequently used in centers performing HR-ARM (44/57). All centers evaluated rest and squeeze. There was marked variation in the methods used to report results of maneuvers. No two centers had identical protocols for patient preparation, setup, study, and data interpretation, and no center fully complied with published guidelines. There is significant discrepancy in methods for data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of ARM. This is likely to impact clinical interpretation, transfer of data between institutions, and research collaboration. There is a need for expert international co-operation to standardize ARM.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 1999
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70447-5
Abstract: Esophageal motility disorders are usually diagnosed by manometry. We evaluated videoendoscopy as a diagnostic test. In this study, 20 patients with achalasia, 13 with scleroderma, and 33 control subjects had a standard endoscopic examination followed by protocol videotaping of swallows to observe contractions in the esophagus and in the lower esophageal sphincter. Tapes were later reviewed by 2 blinded observers who recorded their motility findings and diagnoses. In the mid esophagus at 25 cm, lumen-occluding peristaltic contractions were identified in 26 of 33 control subjects versus 1 of 20 achalasia (p < 0.001) and 3 of 13 scleroderma patients (p < 0.005). As viewed in the lower esophagus, the lower esophageal sphincter opened normally in 31 of 33 control subjects versus 1 of 20 achalasia (p < 0.001). In scleroderma, the sphincter never closed in 12 of 13 patients (p < 0. 001 versus control subjects). A diagnostic sequence of sphincter opening followed by contraction in the esophageal body and subsequent sphincter closing was seen in 33 of 33 control subjects, 2 of 20 achalasia, and 1 of 13 scleroderma patients (both, p < 0. 001). The observers made the correct diagnosis in 96% of cases. Achalasia and esophageal scleroderma can be identified by endoscopic observation of motility. This procedure may represent an adjunctive diagnostic test to manometry.
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 11-04-2018
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Date: 06-2003
Publisher: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
Date: 2008
DOI: 10.3748/WJG.14.3719
Publisher: Wiley
Date: 29-03-2023
DOI: 10.1111/NMO.14580
Abstract: The use of a footstool has been advocated to optimize posture when sitting on the toilet and thus facilitate bowel evacuation. We aimed to assess the alterations in defecatory posture, and the changes in simulated defecation with use of a footstool in patients with constipation. Forty‐one patients (female 93%, mean 52 year, SD 14 year) with constipation referred to a tertiary neurogastroenterology unit were enrolled. A bowel questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Rome questionnaire were administered prior to anorectal manometry. Each patient underwent three rectal balloon expulsion tests in randomized order with no footstool, a 7‐inch, and a 9‐inch footstool. Additional assessments included angle between spine and femur, and visual analogue scales assessing ease of evacuation, urge to defecate, and discomfort with expulsion. Defecatory posture was significantly altered by footstool use, with progressive narrowing of the angle between the spine and femur as footstool height increased ( p 0.001 for all comparisons). Compared with no footstool, the use of a footstool was not associated with a change in balloon expulsion time and there was no difference between the two footstool heights. Subjectively, no significant change was identified in any of the three perceptions of balloon expulsion between no footstool and footstool use. Although the use of a footstool led to changes in defecatory posture, it did not improve subjective or objective measures of simulated defecation in patients with undifferentiated constipation. Therefore, the recommendation for its use during evacuation cannot be applied to all patients with constipation.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 05-2016
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date: 29-08-2018
DOI: 10.1007/S11894-018-0655-4
Abstract: To evaluate and report current evidence regarding the management of bowel dysfunction in spinal cord injury. There is a paucity of high-quality large studies on which to base management advice. Recent research has focused on defining the nature of symptomatology of bowel dysfunction in SCI and describing the effects on quality of life and social interactions. Technical aspects of colonoscopy have received attention, and aspects of understanding the pathophysiology in relation to both neural and non-neural dysfunction have been studied. There has been refinement and expansion of the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options for bowel dysfunction in SCI. Management of bowel dysfunction in SCI requires a comprehensive and in idualized approach, encompassing lifestyle, toileting routine, stimulation, diet, medications, and surgery. Further high-quality research is required to inform best practice.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 2020
Abstract: Fecal incontinence (FI) is a common, debilitating condition that causes major impact on quality of life for those affected. Non-surgical treatment options include anorectal biofeedback therapy (BF) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), usually performed separately. The aims of the current study were to determine the feasibility, tolerability, safety, and efficacy of performing a combined BF and PTNS treatment protocol. Female patients with urge FI were offered a novel pilot program combining BF with PTNS. The treatment protocol consisted of 13 weekly sessions: an educational session, followed by 5 combined BF and PTNS sessions, 6 PTNS and a final combined session. Anorectal physiology and clinical outcomes were assessed throughout the program. For efficacy, patients were compared with BF only historical FI patients matched for age, parity, and severity of symptoms. A total of 12/13 (93%) patients completed the full program. Overall attendance rate was 93% (157/169 sessions). Patient comfort score with treatment was rated high at 9.8/10 (SD 0.7) for PTNS and 8.6/10 (SD 1.7) for the BF component. No major side effects were reported. A reduction of at least 50% in FI episodes/week was achieved by 58% of patients by visit 6, and 92% by visit 13. No physiology changes were evident immediately following PTNS compared with before, but pressure during sustained anal squeeze improved by the end of the treatment course. Comparing outcomes with historical matched controls, reductions in weekly FI episodes were more pronounced in the BF only group at visit 6, but not week 13. In this pilot study, concurrent PTNS and anorectal biofeedback therapy has been shown to be feasible, comfortable, and low risk. The combined protocol is likely to be an effective treatment for FI, but future research could focus on optimizing patient selection.
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Date: 16-08-2016
DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1218537
Abstract: To determine whether anorectal biofeedback therapy can improve the symptoms of fecal incontinence (FI) in patients with scleroderma when compared to patients with functional FI, and also whether there is any effect on anorectal physiology or quality of life (QOL). FI in patients with scleroderma is highly prevalent and is associated with significant loss of QOL. Biofeedback has been proven to be an effective treatment for functional FI, but there are no data to support its use in scleroderma. 13 consecutive female patients (median age 59, IQR 47-65 years) with scleroderma, and 26 age- and parity-matched female patients with functional FI (disease controls, 2:1), underwent biofeedback therapy for management of FI. Fecal incontinence severity index (FISI), anorectal physiology, feeling of control and QOL were collected before and after 6 weeks of biofeedback therapy, with additional scoring repeated at 6-month follow-up. After biofeedback treatment FISI, feeling of control and QOL significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.005). There was no difference in the degree in improvement in physiology, FISI or QOL between scleroderma patients and functional FI patients. Long-term improvement in FISI and control were seen in both groups and for QOL only in the scleroderma cohort (p < 0.05). Patients with scleroderma benefit from biofeedback therapy to the same extent as that achieved in patients with functional FI. There are significant improvements in symptoms, physiology and QOL. Biofeedback is an effective, low-risk treatment option in this patient group.
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Date: 2019
Abstract: Instrumented anorectal biofeedback (BF) improves symptoms and quality of life in patients with faecal incontinence and defecation disorder-associated chronic constipation. However, demand for BF greatly outweighs availability, so refinement of the BF protocol, in terms of the time and resources required, is of importance. Our aim was to evaluate the outcomes of an abbreviated BF protocol in patients with defecation disorder-associated chronic constipation and/or faecal incontinence compared to standard BF. Data were collected from consecutive patients ( n = 31 age 54 ± 15 29 females 61% functional constipation) undergoing an intentionally abbreviated BF protocol, and compared in a 1:2 ratio with 62 age, gender and functional anorectal disorder-matched control patients undergoing a standard BF. Outcomes included change in symptoms, physiology, patient satisfaction and quality of life. On intention to treat, patients in both protocols showed significant improvement in symptom scores and the magnitude did not differ between groups. Impact on quality of life, satisfaction and control over bowel movements improved in both protocols, but satisfaction improved to a greater extent in the standard BF protocol ( p = 0.009). Physiological parameters were unchanged after BF apart from improvement in rectal sensation in the standard BF group compared to abbreviated BF ( p ⩽ 0.002). Abbreviated anorectal BF offered to patients travelling from far away was not different to a standard BF in providing substantial, at least short term, improvements in symptoms of constipation and faecal incontinence, quality of life and feeling of control over bowel movements. Refinement of the standard BF protocol according to in idual patient phenotypes and desired outcomes warrants further study in order to maximize efficacy and improve access for patients.
No related grants have been discovered for Allison Malcolm.