ORCID Profile
0000-0001-5417-3415
Current Organisation
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Does something not look right? The information on this page has been harvested from data sources that may not be up to date. We continue to work with information providers to improve coverage and quality. To report an issue, use the Feedback Form.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 09-2014
DOI: 10.1016/J.PROSDENT.2013.11.012
Abstract: A validated universal method requiring no human input is needed to capture and evaluate preparation geometries in a manner that can be used to see the correlation of different parameters. The purpose of this study was to present a method of capturing and evaluating crown preparation geometry. One manually machined acrylic resin block and 9 randomly selected preparations for ceramic complete crowns prepared by general dentists were selected and prepared. The specimens were scanned (3D scanner Nobel Biocare), and buccolingual and mesiodistal cross section images were collected. The images were imported into digitizing software (Engauge Digitizer 4.1) to convert the outlines into x and y coordinates. Six points were chosen by using a set of algorithms, and the resulting parameters were calculated. The acrylic resin block was milled with a 12 degree total occlusal convergence (TOC) instrument producing a 12.83 degree TOC. For the other specimens, average TOC values ranged from 18 degrees to 52 degrees. The mean average margin width was 0.70 mm, and the mean average base dimension was 6.23 mm. The surface area/volume ratio, resistance length, and limiting taper were also calculated. The method described provides a basis for accurately evaluating preparation geometry without human input.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2015
DOI: 10.1016/J.PROSDENT.2015.01.007
Abstract: Determining the retention and resistance of a tooth preparation for a complete crown has only existed in theory, and these theories have never been measured on tooth preparations performed in vivo. The purpose of this study was to measure the theoretical retention and resistance of clinically produced complete crown preparations by using an objective measuring method. Stone dies from 236 complete crown preparations were collected from dental laboratories. The dies were scanned and analyzed with the coordinate geometry method. Cross-sectional images were captured, and the surface area was measured with a cone frustum and right truncated pyramid formula. Two different theories of resistance form, the "on" or "off" theory (limiting taper) and the linear model (resistance length), were calculated for premolar and molar preparations. The mean surface areas ranged from 33.97 mm(2) to 105.44 mm(2) for the cone frustum formula and 41.75 mm(2) to 117.50 mm(2) for the right truncated pyramid formula. The facial side of maxillary premolars exhibited the highest percentage of resistance form with the limiting taper, at 58%, and the mesial side of the mandibular molars exhibited the lowest percentage of resistance form, at 6%. The objective method used in this study provides a way for retention and resistance theories to be tested and for further clinical implications to be investigated.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 07-2015
DOI: 10.1016/J.PROSDENT.2015.01.006
Abstract: An implemented objective measuring system for measuring clinical tooth preparations does not exist. The purpose of this study was to compare clinically achieved tooth preparations for ceramic crowns by general dentists with the recommended values in the literature with an objective measuring method. Two hundred thirty-six stone dies prepared for anterior and posterior complete ceramic crown restorations (IPS e.max Press Ivoclar Vivadent) were collected from dental laboratories. The dies were scanned and analyzed using the coordinate geometry method. Cross-sectioned images were captured, and the average total occlusal convergence angle, margin width, and abutment height for each preparation was measured and presented with associated 95% confidence intervals. The average total occlusal convergence angles for each tooth type was above the recommended values reported in the literature. The average margin widths (0.40 to 0.83 mm) were below the minimum recommended values (1 to 1.5 mm). The tallest preparations were maxillary canines (5.25 mm), while the shortest preparations were mandibular molars (1.87 mm). Complete crown preparations produced in general practice do not achieve the recommended values found in the literature. However, these recommended values are not based on clinical trials, and the effects of observed shortfalls on the clinical longevity of these restorations are not predictable.
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date: 03-2015
DOI: 10.1016/J.PROSDENT.2014.09.007
Abstract: The geometries of tooth preparations are important features that aid in the retention and resistance of cemented complete crowns. The clinically relevant values and the methods used to measure these are not clear. The purpose of this systematic review was to retrieve, organize, and critically appraise studies measuring clinical tooth preparation parameters, specifically the methodology used to measure the preparation geometry. A database search was performed in Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect with an additional hand search on December 5, 2013. The articles were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria and information regarding the total occlusal convergence (TOC) angle, margin design, and associated measuring methods were extracted. The values and associated measuring methods were tabulated. A total of 1006 publications were initially retrieved. After removing duplicates and filtering by using exclusion and inclusion criteria, 983 articles were excluded. Twenty-three articles reported clinical tooth preparation values. Twenty articles reported the TOC, 4 articles reported margin designs, 4 articles reported margin angles, and 3 articles reported the abutment height of preparations. A variety of methods were used to measure these parameters. TOC values seem to be the most important preparation parameter. Recommended TOC values have increased over the past 4 decades from an unachievable 2- to 5-degree taper to a more realistic 10 to 22 degrees. Recommended values are more likely to be achieved under experimental conditions if crown preparations are performed outside of the mouth. We recommend that a standardized measurement method based on the cross sections of crown preparations and standardized reporting be developed for future studies analyzing preparation geometry.
No related grants have been discovered for Janine Tiu.