ARDC Research Link Australia Research Link Australia   BETA Research
Link
Australia
  • ARDC Newsletter Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About
  • Feedback
  • Explore Collaborations
  • Researcher
  • Funded Activity
  • Organisation
  • Researcher
  • Funded Activity
  • Organisation
  • Researcher
  • Funded Activity
  • Organisation

Need help searching? View our Search Guide.

Advanced Search

Current Selection
Field of Research : Law
Research Topic : policy
Field of Research : Jurisprudence And Legal Theory
Clear All
Filter by Field of Research
Jurisprudence And Legal Theory (4)
Law (4)
Administrative Law (1)
Commercial And Contract Law (1)
Constitutionalism And Constitutional Law (1)
Educational Policy, Administration And Management (1)
Law And Society (1)
Legal History (1)
Political Theory And Political Philosophy (1)
Tort Law (1)
Filter by Socio-Economic Objective
Political science and public policy (3)
Studies in human society (2)
Changing work patterns (1)
Higher education (1)
Justice and the law not elsewhere classified (1)
Understanding legal processes (1)
Filter by Funding Provider
Australian Research Council (4)
Filter by Status
Closed (4)
Filter by Scheme
Discovery Projects (4)
Filter by Country
Australia (4)
Filter by Australian State/Territory
ACT (2)
QLD (1)
VIC (1)
  • Researchers (2)
  • Funded Activities (4)
  • Organisations (2)
  • Funded Activity

    Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP0210707

    Funder
    Australian Research Council
    Funding Amount
    $147,864.00
    Summary
    The Neo-Liberal Legal Academy. Profound changes are occurring in the character of Australian public universities, particularly in respect of the commodification of education, of which no study has yet been undertaken. Using the discipline of law as a case study, this project proposes to study the ramifications of change with particular regard to legal academics, legal education and the constitution of legal knowledge. While the main focus will be directed to the Australian legal academy, compari .... The Neo-Liberal Legal Academy. Profound changes are occurring in the character of Australian public universities, particularly in respect of the commodification of education, of which no study has yet been undertaken. Using the discipline of law as a case study, this project proposes to study the ramifications of change with particular regard to legal academics, legal education and the constitution of legal knowledge. While the main focus will be directed to the Australian legal academy, comparisons will be effected with New Zealand, Canada and the United Kingdom which evince similar trends. The study is expected to remedy a lacuna in knowledge and to inform higher education policy.
    Read more Read less
    More information
    Funded Activity

    Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP0556310

    Funder
    Australian Research Council
    Funding Amount
    $126,470.00
    Summary
    Causation and Liability for Wrongs: A Globalised Analysis. All Australians pay when fundamental legal concepts are unclear. Practitioners' advice to clients becomes difficult, costly and uncertain. Disputants are more likely to litigate, putting unnecessary pressure on over-stretched court resources. Australians pay for courts through taxes and pay indirectly when commercial litigants push their higher legal costs down into the prices they charge. Drawing on materials world-wide this project w .... Causation and Liability for Wrongs: A Globalised Analysis. All Australians pay when fundamental legal concepts are unclear. Practitioners' advice to clients becomes difficult, costly and uncertain. Disputants are more likely to litigate, putting unnecessary pressure on over-stretched court resources. Australians pay for courts through taxes and pay indirectly when commercial litigants push their higher legal costs down into the prices they charge. Drawing on materials world-wide this project will produce a globally-applicable elaboration of two especially problematic concepts, causation and the extent of liability. Such clarification should reduce waste in the Australian economy while ensuring a basic requirement of justice: that like cases are treated alike. Assessment of damages.
    Read more Read less
    More information
    Funded Activity

    Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP0558688

    Funder
    Australian Research Council
    Funding Amount
    $232,356.00
    Summary
    Merits Review of Governmental Decision Making: Principles, Theory and Practice. This project will significantly enhance the quality and impact of decisions by federal courts and tribunals and raise the level of public policy debates in areas such as immigration. The concept and practice of merits review is fundamental to legal regulation of government by federal courts and tribunals. In a society that subscribes to the rule of law as a core value, accurate understanding of this concept and of t .... Merits Review of Governmental Decision Making: Principles, Theory and Practice. This project will significantly enhance the quality and impact of decisions by federal courts and tribunals and raise the level of public policy debates in areas such as immigration. The concept and practice of merits review is fundamental to legal regulation of government by federal courts and tribunals. In a society that subscribes to the rule of law as a core value, accurate understanding of this concept and of the way knowledge about merits review is communicated to administrators is essential. It will help eliminate inefficient and costly uncertainty and misunderstanding about what the law requires, and make a significant contribution to protecting the rights of individuals.
    Read more Read less
    More information
    Funded Activity

    Discovery Projects - Grant ID: DP0346497

    Funder
    Australian Research Council
    Funding Amount
    $52,802.00
    Summary
    Law, state sovereignty and religious terror: renewing the relevance of early modern political jurisprudence. Modern political thought has lost touch with early modern political jurisprudence. Premised on this hypothesis, the project reconstructs the historical role of political jurisprudence as the discipline that conferred legitimacy on the sovereign state under the rule of law, the great invention to end religious war. As a vital instrument of peaceful coexistence among Europe's warring faiths .... Law, state sovereignty and religious terror: renewing the relevance of early modern political jurisprudence. Modern political thought has lost touch with early modern political jurisprudence. Premised on this hypothesis, the project reconstructs the historical role of political jurisprudence as the discipline that conferred legitimacy on the sovereign state under the rule of law, the great invention to end religious war. As a vital instrument of peaceful coexistence among Europe's warring faiths, this early modern discipline is directly relevant to today's renewed concerns with public security against religious terror. The project will both recover the relevance of political jurisprudence, and provide a major historical corrective to anti-juridical and anti-statist research agendas.
    Read more Read less
    More information

    Showing 1-4 of 4 Funded Activites

    Advanced Search

    Advanced search on the Researcher index.

    Advanced search on the Funded Activity index.

    Advanced search on the Organisation index.

    National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy

    The Australian Research Data Commons is enabled by NCRIS.

    ARDC CONNECT NEWSLETTER

    Subscribe to the ARDC Connect Newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest digital research news, events, resources, career opportunities and more.

    Subscribe

    Quick Links

    • Home
    • About Research Link Australia
    • Product Roadmap
    • Documentation
    • Disclaimer
    • Contact ARDC

    We acknowledge and celebrate the First Australians on whose traditional lands we live and work, and we pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging.

    Copyright © ARDC. ACN 633 798 857 Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Accessibility Statement
    Top
    Quick Feedback