The Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) invites you to participate in a short survey about your
interaction with the ARDC and use of our national research infrastructure and services. The survey will take
approximately 5 minutes and is anonymous. It’s open to anyone who uses our digital research infrastructure
services including Reasearch Link Australia.
We will use the information you provide to improve the national research infrastructure and services we
deliver and to report on user satisfaction to the Australian Government’s National Collaborative Research
Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS) program.
Please take a few minutes to provide your input. The survey closes COB Friday 29 May 2026.
Complete the 5 min survey now by clicking on the link below.
A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Intraoperative To Conventional Radiotherapy In Women With Early Beast Cancer.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$874,046.00
Summary
With the advent of breast screening in Australia many women are diagnosed with small low risk cancers that can be treated with breast conserving therapy with good outcomes. Surgery and radiotherapy in this situation are used to minimise the risk of local recurrence. It is now being questioned whether we can tailor radiotherapy to suit individual patients rather than recommending the daily 6-7 weeks of standard external beam radiotherapy to all patients. This trial aims to answer this question as ....With the advent of breast screening in Australia many women are diagnosed with small low risk cancers that can be treated with breast conserving therapy with good outcomes. Surgery and radiotherapy in this situation are used to minimise the risk of local recurrence. It is now being questioned whether we can tailor radiotherapy to suit individual patients rather than recommending the daily 6-7 weeks of standard external beam radiotherapy to all patients. This trial aims to answer this question as a new device which can deliver radiotherapy intraoperatively in a single session has now been tested and proven safe to use in the breast. The main objective of this trial is to demonstrate that a single dose of radiotherapy delivered intraoperatively (IORT) gives an equivalent local control rate to standard external beam radiotherapy in women with early low risk breast cancer who are suitable for breast conserving therapy. Other objectives include comparing the two treatments with respect to; disease-free-overall survival, cosmetic outcome, patient satisfaction-preference, quality of life and cost benefit. If the study finds that IORT alone after breast conserving surgery is as effective in achieving local control as standard external beam radiotherapy, a major benefit to patients would be shorter treatment duration by avoiding the 6-7 weeks of standard radiotherapy. A reduction in the number of early breast cancer patients requiring access to standard radiotherapy would also benefit treatment centres and other cancer patients by reducing the waiting times for radiotherapy. Consumer groups have supported the concept from the beginning and there has been recent increase in level of support by originally unsupportive groups. Of great significance is this trial offers an opportunity to formally investigate the efficacy of delivering IORT in the safe confines of a clinical trial, before allowing it to become a standard treatment which is occurring in other countries.Read moreRead less
SNAC2: A Randomised Trial Of Extending Sentinel Node Based Management To Women With Larger Or Multifocal Breast Cancers
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$1,266,430.00
Summary
SNAC2 extends the work begun in SNAC1, which recruited 1,088 women over 4 years. SNAC1 will determine if sentinel node biopsy causes less arm problems than axillary clearance. The goal of SNAC2 is to establish the risk of local recurrence and long term safety of sentinel node biopsy, especially for women with larger or multiple tumours. SNAC2 is needed to determine whether the smaller operation gives cure rates as good as axillary clearance. If it does, then it will become standard practice.
Genetic Variants, Phenotypic Spectrum And Breast Cancer Risk Associated With Germline Mutations In PALB2: Identifying Female PALB2 Mutation Carriers At The Time Of Diagnosis
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$45,093.00
Summary
Population studies of female breast cancer (BC) show only a small proportion of familial aspects of BC can be explained by current knowledge of its causes. Women carrying PALB2 mutations who also have a strong family history of BC are of increased risk of BC. Our work will further define the risks and devise criteria to identify women most likely to carry PALB2 mutations. This will help prioritize testing, classify PALB2 variants and provide appropriate clinical management to carriers.
SNAC1:A Randomised Trial Of Sentinel Node Based Management Versus Axillary Clearance For Women With Small Breast Cancers
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$1,338,436.00
Summary
SNAC1 compares two operations for assessing cancer spread to the lymph nodes in women with early breast cancer: 1) axillary clearance and 2)sentinel node biopsy. Axillary clearance involves removal of most lymph nodes in the armpit. In sentinel node biopsy only a few lymph nodes most closely related to the breast cancer are removed. The trial will determine if sentinel node biopsy reduces lymphoedema and gives equivalent cure rates. If it does, then it should become standard practice.
SNAC1:A Randomised Trial Of Sentinel Node Based Management Versus Axillary Clearance For Women With Small Breast Cancers
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$240,187.00
Summary
Over 13,000 ANZ women are diagnosed with breast cancer each year. Most need surgery to remove the cancer and determine if it has spead to glands in the armpit (axillary lymph nodes). Knowing whether the cancer has spread to the axillary lymph nodes helps determine prognosis and plan treatment. Surgical removal is the most reliable way to assess the axillary lymph nodes. SNAC1 compares two operations for assessing cancer spread to the lymph nodes in women with early breast cancer: 1) axillary cle ....Over 13,000 ANZ women are diagnosed with breast cancer each year. Most need surgery to remove the cancer and determine if it has spead to glands in the armpit (axillary lymph nodes). Knowing whether the cancer has spread to the axillary lymph nodes helps determine prognosis and plan treatment. Surgical removal is the most reliable way to assess the axillary lymph nodes. SNAC1 compares two operations for assessing cancer spread to the lymph nodes in women with early breast cancer: 1) axillary clearance and 2) sentinel node biopsy. Axillary clearance involves removal of most lymph nodes in the armpit. In sentinel node biopsy only a few lymph nodes most closely related to the breast cancer are removed. Axillary clearance is the current standard operation. However, it is associated with risks including infection, pain, stiffness, numbness and lymphoedema (arm swelling). Lymphoedema may occur in 5-50% of women treated for breast cancer and can cause major suffering and disability. In many women their breast cancer has not spread to the lymph nodes, and axillary clearance is unnecessary. Recent studies suggest sentinel node biopsy may provide as much information as axillary clearance. Scans and dye are used to help locate the sentinel nodes. Minimising the amount of surgery to the armpit should reduce the side effects. However, the long term safety and effectiveness of removing only a few nodes is unknown. The trial will determine if sentinel node biopsy reduces lymohoedema and gives equivalent cure rates. If it does, then it should become standard practice. The study complements comparable studies being done in US, UK and Europe by providing unique information about arm symptoms and quality of life. SNAC1 recruited 1,088 women in 4 years. This application is for the work needed to report on outcomes after all women have been followed for 5 years.Read moreRead less
Tailored Treatments For Premenopausal Patients With Endocrine Responsive Breast Cancer.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$257,250.00
Summary
For women under 50 years with hormone receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer, adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy, tamoxifen and ovarian ablation are each effective and reduce recurrence. Combining two treatments is more effective than one, although it is uncertain if combining three provides extra benefit. Ovarian ablation by surgery or radiation is permanent, but reversible ovarian suppression by injections is now available. Three international trials called SOFT, TEXT and PERCHE have been des ....For women under 50 years with hormone receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer, adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy, tamoxifen and ovarian ablation are each effective and reduce recurrence. Combining two treatments is more effective than one, although it is uncertain if combining three provides extra benefit. Ovarian ablation by surgery or radiation is permanent, but reversible ovarian suppression by injections is now available. Three international trials called SOFT, TEXT and PERCHE have been designed for adjuvant therapy of premenopausal women with ER+ breast cancer. These trials take into account regional-country variations in medical practice and different patient choices in this setting. SOFT is for very young women and tests the benefit of adding ovarian suppression in a woman who has received chemotherapy, with tamoxifen planned, but who has not gone into menopause after chemotherapy. The trial also tests if substituting a newer drug called exemestane for tamoxifen, combined with ovarian function suppression is more effective. TEXT is for women who would ordinarily be treated with ovarian suppression plus tamoxifen. The TEXT trial also tests substitution of exemestane for tamoxifen. Exemestane is an aromatase inhibitor. Aromatase inhibitors lower oestrogen levels, but only work if the ovaries are inactive. Recent trials in post menopausal women show aromatase inhibitors are more effective than tamoxifen, and we aim to replicate that improvement in younger women by combining exemestane with ovarian suppression. PERCHE is for women in whom the benefit of chemotherapy is uncertain, for example those with limited or no spread to lymph nodes. All women receive combined endocrine treatment with ovarian suppression plus tamoxifen, and are randomised to receive in addition, either chemotherapy or no chemotherapy, to see if results differ.Read moreRead less
Tailored Treatments For Premenopausal Women With Endocrine Responsive Breast Cancer.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$299,213.00
Summary
For women <50yrs with ER+ breast cancer adjuvant treatment (AT) with chemotherapy (CT), tamoxifen and ovarian function suppression (OFS) are each effective and reduce recurrence. Combining 2 treatments is more effective than 1, but it is unclear if combining 3 provides any extra benefit. 2 trials,SOFT and TEXT, aim to answer this question. SOFT tests the benefit of adding OFS for very young women who remain premenopausal after CT, TEXT is for women who should receive OFS from the start of AT.
SOFT And TEXT Premenopausal Randomised Adjuvant Endocrine Breast Cancer Trials.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$722,380.00
Summary
SOFT and TEXT trials enrolled premenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer to assess if post-operative hormone treatment that included ovarian function suppression plus tamoxifen, or an aromatase inhibitor exemestane, could improve outcomes. Initial results indicate fewer breast cancer recurrences with the treatment combination of ovarian suppression plus exemestane as compared with tamoxifen, and follow-up of women in these trials can show if overall survival can be improved.