Evaluating Neonatal Intensive Care For Tiny Babies In The 2000s - Is It Still Effective, Efficient And Available?
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$246,333.00
Summary
Most extremely tiny babies, those of birthweight less than 1000 g, need intensive care to survive. However some survivors have substantial problems with their long-term health. Since intensive care is costly we must be sure that it is money well spent. From the late 1970s until the late 1990s in the state of Victoria neonatal intensive care has been increasingly effective, with large increases in the long-term survival rate, from 25% in 1979-80, to 73% in 1997. Its efficiency has been relatively ....Most extremely tiny babies, those of birthweight less than 1000 g, need intensive care to survive. However some survivors have substantial problems with their long-term health. Since intensive care is costly we must be sure that it is money well spent. From the late 1970s until the late 1990s in the state of Victoria neonatal intensive care has been increasingly effective, with large increases in the long-term survival rate, from 25% in 1979-80, to 73% in 1997. Its efficiency has been relatively high and stable over time, comparing favorably with many other health care programmes, both intensive and non-intensive. It has been increasingly available, with fewer than 10% of ELBW infants born outside major hospitals with intensive care nurseries, and more tiny babies offered intensive care. We now need to know if these benefits have been maintained for tiny babies born in the 2000s. Hence we need to assess the long-term health of tiny babies born in Victoria in 2005.Read moreRead less
Postnatal Dexamethasone In Tiny Babies: Does It Do More Good Than Harm?
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$394,688.00
Summary
The survival rate for tiny or very premature babies has improved dramatically in recent times, from below 10% in the 1960s to greater than 70% in the 1990s. However, some of these babies require prolonged periods of help with breathing and oxygen treatment to survive, and many develop a form of chronic lung disease in the newborn period. A powerful group of drugs, known as corticosteroids, have been used to treat or prevent this chronic lung disease in newborn babies, with some success in shorte ....The survival rate for tiny or very premature babies has improved dramatically in recent times, from below 10% in the 1960s to greater than 70% in the 1990s. However, some of these babies require prolonged periods of help with breathing and oxygen treatment to survive, and many develop a form of chronic lung disease in the newborn period. A powerful group of drugs, known as corticosteroids, have been used to treat or prevent this chronic lung disease in newborn babies, with some success in shortening the time that the babies need help with breathing. However, corticosteroids have the potential to cause long-term harm to the developing baby's brain, and may cause lifelong problems with thinking, walking, talking, seeing or hearing. We want to test in a clinical trial if corticosteroids, specifically dexamethasone, can reduce the need for help with breathing and the rate of chronic lung disease without causing long-term problems to the developing baby's brain. Babies who are very tiny (born weighing less than 1000 g), or born very early (born before 28 weeks of pregnancy, or more than 12 weeks premature) will be eligible for this study if they still need help with their breathing after one week of age from a machine called a respirator, and their doctor considers that corticosteroids might be helpful to the baby's breathing. Some babies will receive dexamethasone and other babies will be treated with a harmless placebo - chance will decide which treatment the baby receives. All other aspects of the babies' care will continue as normally. Children who survive to 2 years of age will be assessed fully to determine if they have any problems with their health, including problems with their thinking, walking, talking, seeing or hearing. We will determine if dexamethasone is helpful or not for very tiny or very premature babies who have breathing problems after the first week of life. We will also measure the economic impact of dexamethasone treatment in these babies.Read moreRead less
SCHOOL-AGE OUTCOME FOR VERY TINY/PRETERM CHILDREN BORN IN VICTORIA IN 1991-92
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$252,956.00
Summary
The survival rate for tiny or very premature babies has improved dramatically in recent times, from below 10% in the 1960s to greater than 70% in the 1990s. Several new treatments have helped to improve their survival rate, but some have the potential to cause long-term harm to the developing baby's brain or lung, and may cause lifelong problems with thinking, walking, talking, seeing, hearing, growth or breathing. Babies who are very tiny (born weighing less than 1000 g), or born very early (bo ....The survival rate for tiny or very premature babies has improved dramatically in recent times, from below 10% in the 1960s to greater than 70% in the 1990s. Several new treatments have helped to improve their survival rate, but some have the potential to cause long-term harm to the developing baby's brain or lung, and may cause lifelong problems with thinking, walking, talking, seeing, hearing, growth or breathing. Babies who are very tiny (born weighing less than 1000 g), or born very early (born before 28 weeks of pregnancy, or more than 12 weeks premature) will be assessed long term (to 8-9 years of age), as broadly as possible, and in comparison with normal birthweight (NBW, birthweight >2499 g) children. Outcomes will encompass academic progress and behaviour, brain function, general health, growth, and respiratory health. We will compare the outcomes for very tiny-preterm children who were treated with several of these new therapies with those who were not so treated. We will assess whether alternative measures of long term outcome that assess the quality of life are applicable to very tiny-preterm children. If so, these measures could be used much more widely, since they are cheaper and less time-consuming.Read moreRead less
The Effect Of Very Premature Birth On Brain Development
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$517,975.00
Summary
The neurological outcome of the premature infant is of major importance. Approximately 2,600 premature infants weighing less than 1500 grams are born annually in Australasia. Of the approximate 2,400 survivors between 5-15% will have a more major cerebral palsy, i.e. around 200 children per annum. A greater proportion of 25-50%, i.e., upto 1200 children will have a developmental disability that will adversely affect their school perfomance requiring special assistance or repeating grades. With a ....The neurological outcome of the premature infant is of major importance. Approximately 2,600 premature infants weighing less than 1500 grams are born annually in Australasia. Of the approximate 2,400 survivors between 5-15% will have a more major cerebral palsy, i.e. around 200 children per annum. A greater proportion of 25-50%, i.e., upto 1200 children will have a developmental disability that will adversely affect their school perfomance requiring special assistance or repeating grades. With an increasing number of very prematurely born infants surviving, the absolute number of affected children will continue to rise. Prevention of these disabilities will require an understanding of the cause. The educational and social implications of these high rates of neuro-developmental disability are enormous and the focus of wide international concern. Magnetic Resonance Imaging : It is a major challenge for neonatologists to be able to understand the impact of their therapies and managements on the developing brain. A window into the newborn brain can be seen utilising advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in-vivo to investigate these key issues: 1. What is the nature of brain injury in the prematurely born infant? 2. What are the risk factors for brain injury in the prematurely born infant - and are they able to be altered to reduce this risk - e.g. blood pressure management, steroid therapy 3. Is the brain of a prematurely born infant different from that of a full term born infant at TERM equivalent - if so, how is it different? 4. Are there certain postnatal therapies that relate to any alteration in brain structure and chemistry - e.g. postnatal nutrition, modes of ventilation, pharmacological therapies? 5. How does the brain structure relate to function on long term neuro-developmental follow up of our infants at 2 years?Read moreRead less