After Hours Medical Care And Personal Safety Needs Of Urban General Practitioners
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$73,250.00
Summary
Experiences of violence and aggression are widespread within the health care field. Episodes of violence and aggression against general practitioners (GPs) in their working environment are not uncommon. These incidents frequently go unreported and the toll they take on GPs, on a personal as well as a professional level, is unknown. The frequency and severity of violence experienced by some health professionals is extreme. Such experiences may undermine the confidence and commitment of GPs and ma ....Experiences of violence and aggression are widespread within the health care field. Episodes of violence and aggression against general practitioners (GPs) in their working environment are not uncommon. These incidents frequently go unreported and the toll they take on GPs, on a personal as well as a professional level, is unknown. The frequency and severity of violence experienced by some health professionals is extreme. Such experiences may undermine the confidence and commitment of GPs and may inevitably have detrimental effects on health care services. Studies in the UK indicate that violence against general practitioners is increasing, violence against GPs in rural areas of Australia is also increasing but there have been no comparable studies carried out in our major cities. This research aims to ask general practitioners working in a range of different urban areas around NSW to describe their experiences of dealing with violent and aggressive patients. The study will be the first of its kind in Australia to provide an important insight into the level of violent and aggressive behaviour GPs are subjected to in city areas. One of the key areas of concern that has been reported in medical journals and the general press has been an increase in attacks on GPs making house-calls, this project will therefore be particularly focussed on GPs who provide after hours care. This study is important so in order to find out exactly what the incidence of violence against our urban general practitioners is, what type of violence is actually occurring, where it is occurring, who the perpetrators are, and also what the longer term psychological effects of abuse against general practitioners may be. The findings from this study will be used by the Commonwealth Government and Health Departments to plan better ways of providing after hours medical care. The findings may also be used to educate GPs and medical students about safety in the workplace.Read moreRead less
Increasing The Use Of Long-acting Reversible Contraception: The Australian Contraceptive ChOice PRoject (ACCORd)
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$726,144.00
Summary
Of all reversible contraceptive methods, long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), such as intrauterine devices and hormone implants, are by far the most highly effective at preventing pregnancy. However, the prescription and use of LARCs amongst Australian women who are at risk of pregnancy is very low. To increase the uptake of LARCs, our study will trial a complex intervention that involves providing counselling to women and developing rapid referral pathways to LARC insertion.
The Diamond Cohort Study - Better Management Of Those At Risk Of Persistent And Disabling Depression
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$1,563,309.00
Summary
Diamond began in 2005 to follow over 500 people with depressive symptoms to document and describe the nature and course of depression and its’ management over a decade of a participant’s life. Our findings will help us to understand the factors associated with depression recovery, relapse and persistence. We will inform clinical practice by developing a tool to assist GPs to identify those at risk of persistent and disabling depression, to enable better treatments.
A Longitudinal Study To Determine Aetiology Of The Condition Known As Breast Thrush In Lactating Women
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$775,147.00
Summary
This project looks at 2 common breast problems in breastfeeding women: breast thrush and mastitis (bacterial infection). Some health professionals believe breast thrush is caused by Candida albicans (thrush) while others believe it is caused by the bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (golden staph). This study will follow a group of women to determine if S. aureus or C. albicans is the cause of breast thrush and to describe the transmission of these organisms between mother and baby .
A Perntership Intervention Trial To Redress TreatmentDelay And Improve Outcomes In Rural Cancer Patients
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$1,258,784.00
Summary
Improving the poor outcomes in Australian cancer patients living in rural and remote areas is a national priority, but there is as yet insufficient evidence on how the problem is best tackled. In this project, partner organisations that deliver cancer services in non-metropolitan WA will team with experienced researchers to develop a ‘best prospects’ package of interventions targeting the community, medical and other health practitioners and patients with cancer; and to evaluate the effectivenes ....Improving the poor outcomes in Australian cancer patients living in rural and remote areas is a national priority, but there is as yet insufficient evidence on how the problem is best tackled. In this project, partner organisations that deliver cancer services in non-metropolitan WA will team with experienced researchers to develop a ‘best prospects’ package of interventions targeting the community, medical and other health practitioners and patients with cancer; and to evaluate the effectiveness of the package using a scientifically valid randomised controlled trial.Read moreRead less
Examination of the integration and diffusion of Aboriginal voices in public health collaboratives. Does the integration of Aboriginal voices in governance processes of public health collaboratives influence equity of access in service delivery? Improving access to services is a key priority in order to improve the wellbeing of Aboriginal people. However there is no rigorous scientific evidence base driving current integration reforms. This project will use innovative methodologies (mathematical, ....Examination of the integration and diffusion of Aboriginal voices in public health collaboratives. Does the integration of Aboriginal voices in governance processes of public health collaboratives influence equity of access in service delivery? Improving access to services is a key priority in order to improve the wellbeing of Aboriginal people. However there is no rigorous scientific evidence base driving current integration reforms. This project will use innovative methodologies (mathematical, visual, and vocal) which will lead to a performance indicator framework of the relationships between integration, collaboration, equity and access to services within a social model of health. This is a way to move from assessments of Aboriginal participation processes as 'bad, poor and no' to 'good, green and go'.Read moreRead less
The Common Risk Factor Approach To Assess Relationships Between Dental Caries And Adiposity In Disadvantaged Preschool Children
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$346,449.00
Summary
Dental decay and obesity in early childhood continues to be a significant health concern in Australian children. Current evidence suggests that these diseases are highly prevalent among children living in disadvantaged areas but the evidence of the relationship is limited. This increases their risk to carry the burden in adulthood. The present proposal uses a "common risk factor approach" to explore relationships between dental decay and obesity in disadvantaged preschool children in Australia.
The impact and cost of short-term health staffing in remote communities. This project aims to examine the impact of the increasing levels of short-term health staffing in remote communities upon service acceptability to patients, workload and attitudes of long-term resident primary health care staff, and the effectiveness and cost of health services. There is a dearth of information about this 'fly in/fly out' (FIFO) workforce in remote communities, which have the worst health outcomes in the co ....The impact and cost of short-term health staffing in remote communities. This project aims to examine the impact of the increasing levels of short-term health staffing in remote communities upon service acceptability to patients, workload and attitudes of long-term resident primary health care staff, and the effectiveness and cost of health services. There is a dearth of information about this 'fly in/fly out' (FIFO) workforce in remote communities, which have the worst health outcomes in the country. The project aims to inform consumers, health practitioners, health service planners and policy-makers about the impact of FIFO, as well as to contribute to the development of strategies designed to stabilise the remote health workforce.Read moreRead less
Women's Evaluation Of Abuse And Violence Care Randomised Controlled Trial- Long Term Outcomes
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$284,391.00
Summary
Domestic violence has major health consequences and is a common hidden problem for women attending general practice. The project evaluates if a general practice intervention involving screening women for partner abuse, health provider education and brief counselling for women decreases partner abuse experienced and improves women's mental, physical health, parenting skills & quality of life long term (2 & 3 years after intervention). Further, to understand long term whether it is cost effective.
A Randomised Controlled Trial Of Evidence Based Medicine In The Management Of Hypertension
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$319,475.00
Summary
Hypertension is a major condition managed in general practice. The condition is under diagnosed and under treated. Where hypertension is treated, it is often with drugs that are expensive rather than with equally efficacious inexpensive drugs. Hypertension is associated with higher risk of stroke, coronary artery disease, cardiac failure, renal disease and peripheral vascular disease. Clear evidence-based information has been available for some years that provide reasonably guidelines to practit ....Hypertension is a major condition managed in general practice. The condition is under diagnosed and under treated. Where hypertension is treated, it is often with drugs that are expensive rather than with equally efficacious inexpensive drugs. Hypertension is associated with higher risk of stroke, coronary artery disease, cardiac failure, renal disease and peripheral vascular disease. Clear evidence-based information has been available for some years that provide reasonably guidelines to practitioners of the treatment thresholds for hypertension. However, the incorporation of this evidence into general practice has been slow. This project will build upon extensive pilot work to create a system to collect diagnostic, treatment and outcome data from general practice patients. The use of peer-compared feedback, particularly related to a readily understandable health outcome measure such as blood pressure, can change clinical behaviour when provided to the treating clinician. The aim of this project is to show whether or not training in the use of an evidence-based guideline to assist doctors in the decision of whether or not to initiate antihypertensive treatment, and to provide guidance on the type of treatment, leads to better outcomes than that of feedback alone. A cost-benefit analysis will clarify the impact of guideline implementation on health care costs. The incorporation into the cost-benefit analysis of patients perceptions of treatment by doctors using a guideline will show how such practice, compared with standard care, is valued by patients. While the project will focus on hypertension, the database members will continue to develop the research capability of the database, and expand it to incorporate a range of evidence-based information to improve the quality of care for other conditions. The database could achieve an expanding and sustainable influence on the quality of primary health care.Read moreRead less