Changing Decision-making Behaviour In General Practice By Providing Access To Online Evidence.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$206,375.00
Summary
The case for a shift to evidence-based practice, and the substantial economic and health outcome benefits of that shift, have been repeatedly made. Despite the vision, significant barriers to evidence-based practice remain, and the demonstration of a positive role for on-line systems would result in a significant change in strategies for clinician behaviour change. This study will make a specific and significant contribution to our understanding of the efficacy and effectiveness of online eviden ....The case for a shift to evidence-based practice, and the substantial economic and health outcome benefits of that shift, have been repeatedly made. Despite the vision, significant barriers to evidence-based practice remain, and the demonstration of a positive role for on-line systems would result in a significant change in strategies for clinician behaviour change. This study will make a specific and significant contribution to our understanding of the efficacy and effectiveness of online evidence retrieval systems as a component in any evidence-based strategy, through a rigorous and controlled approach to the study of clinical behaviour change. It will also provide a powerful test of the value of search filters as a specific technology in support of evidence retrieval. The focus on prescribing patterns in NHMRC priority areas as an outcome measure will also provide a significant data set reflecting current practice in primary care.Read moreRead less
Cancer Trials Australia-OnLine: A Tool For Cancer Patients To Find Open Clinical Trials And Consider Trial Participation
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$525,604.00
Summary
We will develop and evaluate a website for consumers which will interface with the ACTR to provide up to date information on currently recruiting cancer trials. Aims are: a) to increase awareness of cancer trials, and facilitate discussion between doctors and patients about participation in a clinical trial, and b) to support cancer consumers to make an informed decision about enrolling in a trial. A randomized trial will assess the effectiveness of the site in achieving these aims.
Development And Evaluation Of A Decision Aid For Women With A Breech-presenting Baby.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$156,890.00
Summary
Many studies have shown that women want to participate in clinical decisions about the treatments they receive during pregnancy and that involvement in decision making increases satisfaction with maternity care. Decision aids are interventions to help people make specific and deliberative decisions by providing information on the options and outcomes relevant to the person's health. This project aims to develop and evaluate the world's first decision aid for women with a breech presenting baby ( ....Many studies have shown that women want to participate in clinical decisions about the treatments they receive during pregnancy and that involvement in decision making increases satisfaction with maternity care. Decision aids are interventions to help people make specific and deliberative decisions by providing information on the options and outcomes relevant to the person's health. This project aims to develop and evaluate the world's first decision aid for women with a breech presenting baby (bottom rather than head first) in late pregnancy. A decision aid for breech presentation is timely because recent results of an international trial have dramatically altered women's options in the management of breech presentation. The trial of vaginal breech birth versus planned caesarean section (CS) found overwhelming evidence of reduced infant death and disability for women with a planned CS. Planned CS is now considered best practice for delivery of a breech presentation at birth. However, another treatment option for women with a breech presentation is turning the breech to head first before birth (called external cephalic version, ECV). Each of these options (ECV or planned CS) has benefits and risks, and the relative importance of these benefits and risks varies for individual women, a scenario where a decision aid produces the greatest benefit. The breech decision aid developed in this project will be based on the best and most recently available evidence and outcomes. It will incorporate a workbook, audiotape-CD and worksheet that will guide (but not direct) women to a treatment option that best suits them, taking ~20 minutes to complete. The decision aid will be evaluated to assess the impact on women's satisfaction with decision making, knowledge, anxiety and pregnancy outcomes. If successful, the results could be applied to improve consumer information and participation in clinical decisions across a wide spectrum of pregnancy care issues.Read moreRead less
Consumer Information Materials And A Communication Aid For Diagnostic Tests For Breast Disease
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$105,863.00
Summary
Many studies have now shown that the majority of patients want to participate in clinical decisions about medical treatments they might receive. As a result, information materials are being developed to help consumers and doctors work together to reach satisfying treatment decisions which are based on the best available evidence and also reflect the individual patient's needs and preferences about the treatment options. Very little is known, however, about whether consumers also want to particip ....Many studies have now shown that the majority of patients want to participate in clinical decisions about medical treatments they might receive. As a result, information materials are being developed to help consumers and doctors work together to reach satisfying treatment decisions which are based on the best available evidence and also reflect the individual patient's needs and preferences about the treatment options. Very little is known, however, about whether consumers also want to participate in decisions about whether to have a medical test. Tests can be trivial, such as a blood or urine test, or quite major and invasive, such as a biopsy or a colonoscopy. People considering a medical test might want to know the answers to the following questions: What is my chance of having the disease being tested for? If the test result is positive what is the chance I have the disease? If the test result is negative what is the chance I have the disease anyway? How will the test result influence treatment of my condition? What are possible side-effects of the test? Generally information materials about medical tests only describe the test itself, and do not contain the information people need to answer these questions. Even doctors may not have to hand the data needed to answer these questions. Yet without this information, consumers cannot make truly informed and rational choices about whether to have the test. This project aims to find out whether consumers want to participate in decisions about medical tests, what information they would want to do this, and to develop and trial information materials and a communication aid for a small number of breast cancer tests. We will use tests for diagnosing breast cancer as our model but we anticipate the work will be applicable across a wide range of medical tests.Read moreRead less
A Randomised Controlled Trial Of A Bowel Cancer Screening Decision Aid For Adults With Low Education And Literacy
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$237,277.00
Summary
The Commonwealth has committed funds for a national bowel cancer screening program. This will involve mailing bowel testing kits direct to eligible consumers at their homes. To minimise inequalities in accessing screening and to ensure effectiveness of the program, information and instructions for testing will have to be accessible to participants from low as well as high educational backgrounds. This project will evaluate communication strategies to achieve this. Reliance on written information ....The Commonwealth has committed funds for a national bowel cancer screening program. This will involve mailing bowel testing kits direct to eligible consumers at their homes. To minimise inequalities in accessing screening and to ensure effectiveness of the program, information and instructions for testing will have to be accessible to participants from low as well as high educational backgrounds. This project will evaluate communication strategies to achieve this. Reliance on written information has rapidly increased within healthcare. In particular, the use of patient decision aids to support and inform health decisions is rapidly increasing. The need to improve information in screening programs has been particularly highlighted and decision aids provide an evidence based approach to achieve this. However, whilst there is level 1 evidence that decision aids improve the decision making process for consumers, research has been carried out almost exclusively among educated participants with high literacy. There is concern that the needs of adults with low education and limited literacy have been ignored. The proposed study is 2 phased. Phase I will test optimal quantitative risk communication formats for adults with low education and literacy. Phase 2 will evaluate a tailored low literacy decision aid for FOBT screening. The trial will test whether the decision aid can increase knowledge of screening, increase involvement in decisions and improve the quality of decision making among adults with low education, and will examine its impact on screening intentions and behaviour. This is a highly significant study. Screening providers need better ways to inform consumers of screening programs that are accessible to a diverse audience and equitable across the target population. This study will have direct implications for use in the national bowel cancer screening program.Read moreRead less
A Randomised Controlled Trial Of A Decision Aid For The Management Of Pain In Labour And Childbirth
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$267,375.00
Summary
Many studies have shown that women want to participate in clinical decisions about the treatments they receive during pregnancy and that involvement in decision making increases satisfaction with maternity care. Decision aids are interventions to help people make specific and deliberative decisions by providing information on the options and outcomes relevant to the person's health. This project aims to develop and evaluate the world's first decision aid for women regarding the management of pai ....Many studies have shown that women want to participate in clinical decisions about the treatments they receive during pregnancy and that involvement in decision making increases satisfaction with maternity care. Decision aids are interventions to help people make specific and deliberative decisions by providing information on the options and outcomes relevant to the person's health. This project aims to develop and evaluate the world's first decision aid for women regarding the management of pain in labour and childbirth. A decision aid for managing the pain of childbirth is both practical and timely because there is a strong evidence base on labour analgesia but a lack of evidence-based information for women. For example, brochures on epidural analgesia outline the advantages of epidurals such as complete amelioration of pain, but do not present any information on adverse obstetric outcomes such as the doubling of risk for an instrumental birth. Most women are willing to experience pain in childbirth but do not want pain to overwhelm them. The decision aid will include a range of available drug and non-drug options for pain relief in labour and childbirth. Each of the options has benefits and risks, and the relative importance of these benefits and risks varies for individual women, a scenario where a decision aid produces the greatest benefit. The pain management decision aid developed in this project will be based on the best most recently available evidence and outcomes. It will incorporate a workbook, audiotape-CD and worksheet that will guide (but not direct) women with their pain management options that best suit them, taking ~30 minutes to complete. The decision aid will be evaluated to assess the impact on women's satisfaction with decision making, knowledge, anxiety and pregnancy outcomes. If successful, the results could be applied to improve consumer information and participation in clinical decisions across a wide spectrum of pregnancy care issues.Read moreRead less
An Ethical Analysis Of The Disclosure Of Surgeons' Performance Data To Patients Within The Informed Consent Process
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$148,937.00
Summary
For over a decade, hospitals in the American state of New York have been collecting information about the mortality rates of surgeons conducting Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts, and making this information available to patients. The United Kingdom is set to make these and other performance indicators on the ability of surgeons ('report cards') available from 2004. There are good reasons to think a similar system may be introduced in Australia in the near future. Patients can use the information co ....For over a decade, hospitals in the American state of New York have been collecting information about the mortality rates of surgeons conducting Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts, and making this information available to patients. The United Kingdom is set to make these and other performance indicators on the ability of surgeons ('report cards') available from 2004. There are good reasons to think a similar system may be introduced in Australia in the near future. Patients can use the information contained in report cards when deciding whether or not to consent to have a particular surgeon conduct an operation on them. Contemporary bioethicists stress the importance of a proper informed consent process in medicine. This is a process in which a doctor advises a patient of relevant information and ensures that the patient comprehends that information, before the patient consents to an operation. Currently report cards in America are publicly disseminated on the internet, however there is no systematic attempt to incorporate the information contained in report cards into the informed consent process. We do not know if patients understand the information they are given, or if they incorporate it into their decision making procedures appropriately. In our study we will consider how information that is contained in report cards could best be used in the informed consent process. We will keep in mind the importance of helping patients to make their own informed decisions to consent to operations, the importance of respecting the professional integrity of surgeons and the importance of providing the best possible standard of care for patients. The result of our study will be a revised model of the informed consent process that incorporates report cards in an ethically acceptable way.Read moreRead less
A Randomised Trial Of A Decision Aid For Women At Increased Risk For Ovarian Cancer
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$115,110.00
Summary
Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynaecological malignancy in Australia. The majority of women with ovarian cancer are diagnosed with advanced disease, and the chance of cure is low. The strongest risk factor for ovarian cancer identified to date is a family history of ovarian cancer, and up to 5% of all ovarian cancers are thought to be due to dominantly inherited mutations in a small number of ovarian-cancer-related genes. National guidelines on surveillance and pro ....Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynaecological malignancy in Australia. The majority of women with ovarian cancer are diagnosed with advanced disease, and the chance of cure is low. The strongest risk factor for ovarian cancer identified to date is a family history of ovarian cancer, and up to 5% of all ovarian cancers are thought to be due to dominantly inherited mutations in a small number of ovarian-cancer-related genes. National guidelines on surveillance and prophylactic strategies have recently been ratified. These are largely based on expert opinion. Because of the uncertain efficacy of ovarian cancer screening and the high mortality associated with ovarian cancer, prophylactic oophorectomy is considered an option for women at high risk. Decisions about optimal care are difficult for both women and their doctors. Efforts to improve services for women who are trying to make informed decisions about screening and prophylactic strategies under conditions of uncertainty must be informed by sound knowledge of the efficacy of educational interventions. Decision aids have been developed as adjuncts to practitioners' counselling to prepare patients for decision-making. The proposed randomised controlled trial will compare the efficacy of a general educational pamphlet and that of a tailored decision aid. A total of 120 women at risk for ovarian cancer who are attending one of five familial cancer clinics will be included in the trial to determine the efficacy of different educational interventions in preparing women for decision-making about screening and prophylactic options.Read moreRead less
Alternatives To Homologous Blood Transfusion - Development Of Evidence- Based Decision Aids.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$213,697.00
Summary
Transfusion of donor blood is the traditional means of treating blood loss resulting from injury or during surgery. Donor blood is in short supply and in the past there have been episodes of contamination by viruses that have led to hepatitis and AIDS. Consequently there is much interest in a range of techniques designed to reduce the need for transfusion of donor blood. One of the most popular is transfusion of patients' own blood (autologous transfusion). Despite the popularity of some of thes ....Transfusion of donor blood is the traditional means of treating blood loss resulting from injury or during surgery. Donor blood is in short supply and in the past there have been episodes of contamination by viruses that have led to hepatitis and AIDS. Consequently there is much interest in a range of techniques designed to reduce the need for transfusion of donor blood. One of the most popular is transfusion of patients' own blood (autologous transfusion). Despite the popularity of some of these techniques their true value is not really proven. They may be capable of diminishing the need for a transfusion of donor blood, but the long-term effects of this are not clear. In addition the preparation of autologous blood is a burden for overworked blood banks, and autologous blood may itself be associated with its own problems. The main aims of this study are to carry out reviews of the best quality trials of the various alternatives to transfusion of donor blood and to carry out surveys to find out what patients and doctors think. In a third phase of the project we will use the information gathered in the first two phases to design decision aids. These are comprehensive structured summaries of the available evidence to enable patients and their physicians to collaborate in making informed decisions that are likely to lead to the best outcomes for patients. The products of the research will be a number of reviews of 'best evidence' that appear in the International Cochrane Library, available to health professionals around the world. In addition, the decision aids, if successful, will be made available in a form that can be used by all Australian patients who are facing surgery that is likely to require a blood transfusion.Read moreRead less
Prospective Evaluation Of A Model To Predict Outcomes Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Amount
$1,098,901.00
Summary
Once present, abdominal aortic aneurysms tend to enlarge over time resulting in an increased risk of death if they rupture. Endovascular aneurysm repair may be used to fix the aneurysm but this procedure can result in complications over time. We developed a model that uses pre-operative information to predict the chance of an individual having poor results.This study aims to assess whether the model is a good predictor of outcomes and whether extra information will improve its accuracy.